Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Conditions
Keywords
US, MRI, HCC, surveillance, risk estimation
Brief summary
In a high-risk group, ultrasonography at 6-month intervals and short-protocol magnetic resonance imaging at 1-year intervals were performed. sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for very early stage HCC are compared between conventional (biannual US) and alternative surveillance test are compared
Interventions
non-contrast liver MRI focusing on HCC surveillance in a short scan time.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* chronic hepatitis B or C * Child-Pugh classification A * HCC risk score \>= -2.04 * have not diagnosed with HCC * on surveillance program using US and negative on previous US within 6-8 months of enrollment * sign informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* younger than 40 years or older than 70 years old * history of HCC * severe GFR or on HD/PD due to renal failure * contra-indication of MRI * congestive hepatopathy * iron deposition * pregnancy or nursing mother * non-viral hepatitis or liver cirrhosis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of alternative surveillance program (alternating focused MRI + US in 6 month interval) and conventional surveillance (biannual US) for HCC detection | up to one year | per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value for very early stage HCC, early stage HCC, all stage of HCC/liver cancer. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of annual focused MRI and biannual US for HCC detection | up to one year | per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value for very early stage HCC, early stage HCC, all stage of HCC/liver cancer. |
| diagnostic yield for HCC | up to one year | HCC incidence in the group and detection rate with either US or focused MRI |
| scan time of focused MRI | up to one month | in room time, table time are manually recorded |
| comparison between false referral rates of biannual US and annual focused MRI | up to one year | comparison between false positive report/finding for HCC in each surveillance modality. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| comparison between incidental findings between biannual US and annual focused MRI | up to one year | comparison of incidental findings detected between biannual US and annual focused MRI. |
Countries
South Korea