Skip to content

PErsonalized TReatment for Endometrial Carcinoma

PErsonalized TReatment for Endometrial Carcinoma

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05655260
Acronym
PETREC
Enrollment
300
Registered
2022-12-19
Start date
2022-02-08
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2024-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrial Adenocarcinoma

Keywords

Endometrial carcinoma, Molecular classification, Adjuvant therapy

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of adjuvant therapies in women with stage I-II molecular integrated high-intermediate or high-risk endometrial carcinoma. Specifically, the invesigators want to compare: * Chemotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy in p53 abn subtype and nonendometrioid carcinomas. * Vaginal brachytherapy vs. whole pelvic radiotherapy in the MMR-D molecular subgroup. * Vaginal brachytherapy vs. whole pelvic radiotherapy in the NSMP molecular subgroup.

Detailed description

Endometrial carcinomas can be classified into four molecular subgroups, i.e. mismatch repair deficient (MMR-D), p53 abnormal (p53 abn), polymerase-ϵ (POLE) ultramutated, and no specific molecular profile (NSMP). Molecular subgroups can be considered to be distinct diseases as they are associated with different clinicopathologic characteristics, prognoses and, possibly, responses to adjuvant therapy. Molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma is recommended to be implemented in routine clinical practice to improve prognostication and triage to adjuvant therapy. The PErsonalized TReatment for Endometrial Carcinoma (PETREC) trial, led by the Finnish Gynecologic Oncology Group (FINGOG), is a multicenter prospective clinical trial for women with stage I-II molecular integrated high-intermediate or high-risk endometrial carcinoma. The efficacy of chemotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy is compared in p53 abn subtype and nonendometrioid carcinomas, and vaginal brachytherapy vs. whole pelvic radiotherapy in MMR-D and NSMP molecular subgroups. Patients who consent to follow-up within the trial but not to randomization are treated as recommended in multidisciplinary meetings and enrolled for follow-up only (comprehensive cohort study design). The primary outcome is the 5-year cumulative incidence of disease recurrence. Secondary outcomes are vaginal, pelvic, and distant recurrence rates, 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival, adverse events, and patient-reported symptoms and quality of life. The findings of the trial may eventually help decrease under- and overtreatment and, consequently, improve patient outcome and decrease treatment-associated adverse effects.

Interventions

OTHERComparison of chemotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy

Chemotherapy (paclitaxel-carboplatin) vs. chemoradiotherapy (paclitaxel-carboplatin followed by whole pelvic radiotherapy) Patients assigned to chemotherapy receive paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under curve, 5) every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. The pelvic radiotherapy dose is 45 to 50.4 Gy over 5 to 6 weeks (1.8 Gy per day for 25 to 28 fractions).

OTHERComparison of VBT vs. WPRT

Vaginal brachytherapy vs. whole pelvic radiotherapy Patients randomized to vaginal brachytherapy receive cuff brachytherapy at 21 Gy in 3 fractions of 7 Gy at 0.5 cm depth. The pelvic radiotherapy dose is 45 to 50.4 Gy over 5 to 6 weeks (1.8 Gy per day for 25 to 28 fractions).

Sponsors

Turku University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Tampere University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Kuopio University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Oulu University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Kymenlaakso Central Hospital Kotka Finland
CollaboratorOTHER
Päijänne Tavastia Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
South Carelia Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Helsinki
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Comprehensive cohort design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 to 100 years * WHO performance status 0 to 2 * Stage I-II molecular integrated high-intermediate or high-risk endometrial carcinoma

Exclusion criteria

* Age \<18 years or \>100 years * WHO performance status \>2 * Uterine sarcoma * A history of malignancy within 5 years * Previous pelvic radiotherapy * An interval of \>30 days between surgery and start of chemotherapy or \>8 weeks between surgery and start of radiotherapy (longer intervals may be permitted with investigator´s approval)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cancer reappearance5 yearsCumulative incidence of disease recurrence

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Location of cancer reappearance5 yearsVaginal, pelvic, and distant recurrence rates
Overall survival5 yearsThe time from surgery to death
Recurrence-free survival5 yearsThe time from surgery to cancer recurrence
Adverse events5 yearsAdjuvant therapy-related adverse events

Countries

Finland

Contacts

Primary ContactMikko Loukovaara
mikko.loukovaara@hus.fi+358504272526
Backup ContactRalf Bützow
ralf.butzow@hus.fi+358504271899

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026