Skip to content

Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Apolipoprotein E Genotype, and Cognitive Functions: A Prospective Study

Cardiorespiratory Fitness and the Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) Genotype and Its Interaction With Cognitive Functions and Cognitive Decline in Late-Middle-Aged Older Adults: A Prospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05652140
Enrollment
159
Registered
2022-12-15
Start date
2018-07-01
Completion date
2021-05-01
Last updated
2024-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging, Cognitive Change

Keywords

physical fitness, Apolipoprotein E, event-related potential

Brief summary

The current research project aims to investigate the interaction of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and the ApoE genotype with neurocognitive functions.

Detailed description

The current research project aims to investigate the interaction of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and the ApoE genotype with neurocognitive functions. The three main purposes of the current research project seek to achieve: 1. An exploration of the associations of, as well as the interactions between, CRF assessed at the Baseline Stage, and the ApoE genotype, along with cognitive functions in cognitively healthy late-middle-aged older adults. 2. The employing of an event-related potential (ERP) to investigate the associations between the baseline CRF, the ApoE genotype, and cognitive functions in cognitively healthy late-middle-aged older adults, as well as the potential underlying neuroelectrical mechanisms. 3. An investigation of the interactions between the changes of CRFs assessed at the Baseline and the Follow-Up Stages and the ApoE genotype in relation to neurocognitive function, as well as the underlying neuroelectrical mechanisms, in cognitively healthy late-middle-aged older adults.

Interventions

Data collections of cognitive function, neuroelectrical activities, ApoE genotype, and physical fitness.

Sponsors

National Taiwan Normal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* right handed * no history of cardiorespiratory disease * normal or corrected-to-normal vision based on the 20/20 standard * no risk of performing physical activities, as measured by the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire

Exclusion criteria

* the scores of Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) \< 25 and cognitively intact upon study entry * history of psychiatric or neurological diseases * color-blindness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Inhibitory Performance: Stroop Task30 minutes each at the Baseline and the Follow-Up visit at Month 18Inhibitory performance was assessed using the computerized Stroop task at the Baseline and at the Follow-Up assessments. The difference in response time (RT) between the Baseline and the Follow-Up Stages was calculated as the index of the inhibitory performance.
Changes in Neuroelectrical Activities30 minutes each at the Baseline and the Follow-Up visit at Month 18The neuroelectrical activities (P3 component) during the Stroop task were recorded and analyzed using the Neuroscan system. The difference in P3 amplitudes of incongruent trials between the Baseline and the Follow-Up Stages was calculated as the index of the neuroelectrical index.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants for Whom ApoE Genotype Was Determined5 minutes at the Baseline Stage.Participants' ApoE genotype was determined based on the genetic biomarkers (rs429358 and rs7412)
Physical Fitness Measurements: Changes in Aerobic Fitness30 minutes each at the Baseline and the Follow-Up visit at Month 18Participants' aerobic fitness was estimated using the submaximal cycle ergometer test at the baseline and at the follow-up assessments. The difference in maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max) between the Baseline and the Follow-Up Stages was calculated as the index of aerobic fitness.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Higher Order Executive Performance: Tower of London Test30 minutes each at the Baseline and the Follow-Up Stages.Higher order executive performance was assessed using the Tower of London Test at the baseline and at the follow-up assessments. Changes in higher order executive performance from Baseline to the Follow-Up Stages were assessed.

Countries

Taiwan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
High-Risk With Decreased CRF
ApoE e4 carriers with decreased CRF from Baseline to the Follow-Up Stages. Data collections: Data collections of cognitive function, neuroelectrical activities, ApoE genotype, and physical fitness.
22
High-Risk With Increased CRF
ApoE e4 carriers with increased CRF from Baseline to the Follow-Up Stages. Data collections: Data collections of cognitive function, neuroelectrical activities, ApoE genotype, and physical fitness.
21
Low-Risk With Decreased CRF
Non-ApoE e4 carriers with decreased CRF from Baseline to the Follow-Up Stages. Data collections: Data collections of cognitive function, neuroelectrical activities, ApoE genotype, and physical fitness.
57
Low-Risk With Increased CRF
Non-ApoE e4 carriers with increased CRF from Baseline to the Follow-Up Stages. Data collections: Data collections of cognitive function, neuroelectrical activities, ApoE genotype, and physical fitness.
59
Total159

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up7162231

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHigh-Risk With Decreased CRFHigh-Risk With Increased CRFLow-Risk With Decreased CRFLow-Risk With Increased CRFTotal
Age, Customized
Aged between 50-70 year-old
22 participants21 participants57 participants59 participants159 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
22 Participants21 Participants57 Participants59 Participants159 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
22 participants21 participants57 participants59 participants159 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants16 Participants44 Participants45 Participants120 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants5 Participants13 Participants14 Participants39 Participants
Stroop response time (RT)730.68 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 84.52
678.90 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 86.19
722.12 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 86.13
701.81 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 67.91
710.06 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 80.49

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 220 / 210 / 570 / 59
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 220 / 210 / 570 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 210 / 570 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Changes in Inhibitory Performance: Stroop Task

Inhibitory performance was assessed using the computerized Stroop task at the Baseline and at the Follow-Up assessments. The difference in response time (RT) between the Baseline and the Follow-Up Stages was calculated as the index of the inhibitory performance.

Time frame: 30 minutes each at the Baseline and the Follow-Up visit at Month 18

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Risk With Decreased CRFChanges in Inhibitory Performance: Stroop Task1.66 msStandard Error 13.3
High-Risk With Increased CRFChanges in Inhibitory Performance: Stroop Task-29.85 msStandard Error 3.21
Low-Risk With Decreased CRFChanges in Inhibitory Performance: Stroop Task21.49 msStandard Error 8.75
Low-Risk With Increased CRFChanges in Inhibitory Performance: Stroop Task-20.13 msStandard Error 9.78
Primary

Changes in Neuroelectrical Activities

The neuroelectrical activities (P3 component) during the Stroop task were recorded and analyzed using the Neuroscan system. The difference in P3 amplitudes of incongruent trials between the Baseline and the Follow-Up Stages was calculated as the index of the neuroelectrical index.

Time frame: 30 minutes each at the Baseline and the Follow-Up visit at Month 18

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Risk With Decreased CRFChanges in Neuroelectrical Activities-1.80 microvoltStandard Error 0.9
High-Risk With Increased CRFChanges in Neuroelectrical Activities2.81 microvoltStandard Error 1.76
Low-Risk With Decreased CRFChanges in Neuroelectrical Activities-1.20 microvoltStandard Error 0.61
Low-Risk With Increased CRFChanges in Neuroelectrical Activities0.57 microvoltStandard Error 0.67
Secondary

Number of Participants for Whom ApoE Genotype Was Determined

Participants' ApoE genotype was determined based on the genetic biomarkers (rs429358 and rs7412)

Time frame: 5 minutes at the Baseline Stage.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High-Risk With Decreased CRFNumber of Participants for Whom ApoE Genotype Was Determined22 Participants
High-Risk With Increased CRFNumber of Participants for Whom ApoE Genotype Was Determined21 Participants
Low-Risk With Decreased CRFNumber of Participants for Whom ApoE Genotype Was Determined57 Participants
Low-Risk With Increased CRFNumber of Participants for Whom ApoE Genotype Was Determined59 Participants
Secondary

Physical Fitness Measurements: Changes in Aerobic Fitness

Participants' aerobic fitness was estimated using the submaximal cycle ergometer test at the baseline and at the follow-up assessments. The difference in maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max) between the Baseline and the Follow-Up Stages was calculated as the index of aerobic fitness.

Time frame: 30 minutes each at the Baseline and the Follow-Up visit at Month 18

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Risk With Decreased CRFPhysical Fitness Measurements: Changes in Aerobic Fitness-4.03 ml·kg-1·min-1Standard Error 3.18
High-Risk With Increased CRFPhysical Fitness Measurements: Changes in Aerobic Fitness1.52 ml·kg-1·min-1Standard Error 2.08
Low-Risk With Decreased CRFPhysical Fitness Measurements: Changes in Aerobic Fitness-4.76 ml·kg-1·min-1Standard Error 3.65
Low-Risk With Increased CRFPhysical Fitness Measurements: Changes in Aerobic Fitness3.28 ml·kg-1·min-1Standard Error 4.29
Other Pre-specified

Changes in Higher Order Executive Performance: Tower of London Test

Higher order executive performance was assessed using the Tower of London Test at the baseline and at the follow-up assessments. Changes in higher order executive performance from Baseline to the Follow-Up Stages were assessed.

Time frame: 30 minutes each at the Baseline and the Follow-Up Stages.

Population: The Tower of London Test, a pre-specified Primary Outcome Measure, was not administered to any participants due to unforeseen constraints in practical resource availability at the study sites (i.e., unavailability of required test materials and time limitations that precluded its inclusion within the study timeline). Consequently, no data was collected for this outcome measure.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026