Skip to content

Safety and Tolerability of a Novel Implantable Device for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction

Safety and Tolerability of a Novel Implantable Device for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05650866
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-12-14
Start date
2023-05-19
Completion date
2026-08-31
Last updated
2026-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess if a new device is safe to use as a potential treatment for erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the device safe? * Does the device works well? Are the participants satisfied with the device? Participants will be implanted with the device during the ongoing prostatectomy surgery and will be asked to complete the following tasks during 6 months follow-up: * Come to the hospital for follow-up visits, * Complete questionnaires, * Activate the device every day, * Measure erection hardness. Researchers will compare an implanted group (participants having the device) with a control group (participants not having the device) to see if the device works well.

Interventions

The study device is an active implantable device. The device activates the cavernous nerves by delivering electrical pulses, to trigger an on-demand erection. The daily delivery of electrical pulses to the cavernous nerves will also allow participants to recover natural erectile function.

Sponsors

Comphya Australia
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
30 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men of ages between 30-70 years; * Men with indication for nerve-sparing prostatectomy surgery; * Localised prostate cancer considered suitable for bilateral nerve sparing prostatectomy according to clinical criteria * International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) erectile function domain score equal to or greater than 26 prior prostatectomy; * Men interested in minimizing the effect of radical prostatectomy on erectile function; * Ability to read and understand patient information materials and willingness to sign a written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Men with neurological disease, including a history of spinal cord injury or trauma; * IIEF-15 erectile function domain score less than 26 prior prostatectomy; * Failure to demonstrate adequate nocturnal erectile function prior prostatectomy; * History of erectile dysfunction, priapism and Peyronie disease; * History of previous pelvic surgery, trauma or irradiation therapy; * Currently have an active implantable device; * Patient diagnosed with neurologic degenerative diseases that may negatively impact erectile functions; * Identification of technical or clinical limitation to properly apply the use of nerve-sparing techniques during operation; * Inability to understand and demonstrate device use instructions; * Patients with insulin-dependent diabetes who suffer peripheral neuropathy or other diabetes associated complications; * Patient unwillingness to engage in sexual activity; * Patient is currently participating in another clinical investigation that would serve as a contraindication to implant a neurostimulator device to augment erectile function; * Have participated in any drug or device trial in the last 4 weeks or plan to participate in any other drug or device study during the next 24 months; * Possess any other characteristics that, per the investigator's judgment, may increase the risk or impair data collection for the procedure/study; * Patient is a member of a vulnerable population (Vulnerable participants include those who lack consent capacity, including the mentally ill, prisoners, cognitively impaired participants, and employee volunteers).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Occurrence of adverse events6 monthsAdverse events will be reported using MedDRA terminology.
Occurrence of surgical complications6 monthsSurgical complications will be ranked according to the Clavien-Dindo classification
Occurrence of device deficiencies6 monthsDevice deficiencies will be systematically reported and recorded.
Pain6 monthsPatients will be asked to rate pain on a visual analog scale (from 0 to 10)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Device effectiveness6 monthsErectile response obtained when activating the study device will be objectively assessed by measuring penile rigidity with the RigiScan device.
Subjective Device effectiveness6 monthsErectile function will be subjectively assessed by asking participants to complete validated questionnaires (International Index of Erectile Function, IIEF-15 and Erection Hardness Score, EHS).
Erectile function recovery6 monthsNocturnal penile erections will be assessed with the RigiScan device. Nocturnal erections reflect the extent of recovery of natural erectile function.
Delineation of the surgical implantation procedure6 monthsThe surgeon will record information related to the implantation (duration, position of the device, grading ease of implantation steps, and any comments).

Countries

Australia

Contacts

CONTACTHelen Crowe
helenrcrowe@gmail.com+61 3 8373 7600

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026