Skip to content

Feasibility and Effect of Resistance Training and Protein Supplementation in Patients With Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer

Feasibility and Effect of Resistance Training and Protein Supplementation in Patients With Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05650827
Enrollment
54
Registered
2022-12-14
Start date
2023-02-24
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastro-esophageal Cancer

Keywords

Exercise oncology, Resistance exercise, Cancer, Cancer cachexia, Protein supplements, Sarcopenia, Palliative chemotherapy

Brief summary

Patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer are in great risk of losing skeletal muscle mass and developing cancer cachexia. Low skeletal muscle mass has a negative impact on quality of life, impairs physical function, increases toxicity from anti-neoplastic treatment, as well as increases risk of death. Resistance training and protein supplements have the potential to stimulate muscle anabolism and counteract loss of skeletal muscle mass. Therefore, the investigators have designed a randomized controlled feasibility trial to evaluate the feasibility, safety and the therapeutic effect of resistance training and protein supplements in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer undergoing first line chemotherapy. A total of 54 patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer will be recruited from the Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet and randomly allocated 2:1 to standard care plus resistance training 3 times pr. week and a daily supplement of protein or to standard care alone.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALResistance training

10 weeks of resistance training 3 times pr. week.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTProtein supplement

A daily supplement of protein to ensure a daily intake of 1,6g protein/kg bodyweight

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* histologically verified, non-resectable cancer of the esophagus, stomach, or gastroesophageal junction * referred to first line chemotherapy.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 * Living outside the greater Copenhagen area * Any other malignancy requiring active treatment * Not eligible for chemotherapy * Performance status \> 2 * Not able to swallow liquids * Parenteral nutrition or enteral nutrition via feeding tube * Physical or mental disabilities that prohibit execution of test or training procedures * Pregnancy * Inability to understand the Danish language

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exercise feasibility: Exercise sessions attendanceFrom baseline until end of intervention (10 weeks)The number of attended exercise training sessions relative to the number of planed exercise sessions
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).Baseline until end of intervention (10 weeks)SAE will be recorded during trial assessment visits and through medical records. This procedure will concern any SAE during the trial period. For each trial visit we will collect patients' self-report of SAEs, which may have occurred during the period since the last trial visit.
Exercise feasibility: Relative dose-intensity of protein supplementFrom baseline until end of intervention (10 weeks)The actual amount consumed relative to the amount prescribed over the intervention period

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-reported physical activity: WalkingBaseline, end of week 10Changes in patient-reported weekly duration of walking, assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
1 and 2-years cancer-specific survivalRandomization to 1 and 2 years after randomizationProportion of patients who have not died from gastroesophageal cancer 1 and 2 years after randomization
1 and 2-years over-all survivalRandomization to 1 and 2 years after randomizationProportion of patients who have not died 1 and 2 years after randomization
Progression-free survivalRandomization to 2 years after randomizationTime to progression
Treatment tolerance: Hospitalization3, 6 and 9 weeks after randomizationUnscheduled hospitalization
Treatment tolerance: Relative dose intensity3, 6 and 9 weeks after randomizationTreatment tolerance assessed by the delivery of chemotherapy (relative dose intensity)
Treatment tolerance: Number of series recieved3, 6 and 9 weeks after randomizationTreatment tolerance assessed by the delivery of chemotherapy (number of series recieved)
Treatment tolerance: Tolerated dose3, 6 and 9 weeks after randomizationTreatment tolerance assessed by the delivery of chemotherapy (dose reduction)
Treatment tolerance: Permanent discontinuation of the treatment3, 6 and 9 weeks after randomizationTreatment tolerance assessed by the delivery of chemotherapy (permanent discontinuation of the treatment)
Treatment effect: Response to chemotherapyRandomization to 2 years after randomizationResponse to chemotherapy assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (complete response, partiel response, stable disease, progressive disease)
Health-related quality of life: Physical well-beingBaseline, 10 weeks-, 1 year-, and 2 years after randomizationChanges in patient-reported physical well-being assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Esophagus (FACT-E) (scale-scoring 0-28, the higher the score the better quality of life)
Health-related quality of life: Social well-beingBaseline, 10 weeks-, 1 year-, and 2 years after randomizationChanges in patient-reported social well-being assessed using FACT-E (scale-scoring 0-28, the higher the score the better quality of life)
Health-related quality of life: Emotional well-beingBaseline, 10 weeks-, 1 year-, and 2 years after randomizationChanges in patient-reported social well-being assessed using FACT-E (scale-scoring 0-24, the higher the score the better quality of life)
Health-related quality of life: Functional well-beingBaseline,10 weeks-, 1 year-, 2 years after randomizationChanges in patient-reported functional well-being assessed using FACT-E (scale-scoring 0-28, the higher the score the better quality of life)
Health-related quality of life: gastroesophageal cancer specificBaseline, 10 weeks-, 1 year-, and 2 years after randomizationChanges in patient-reported gastroesophageal cancer specific well-being assessed using FACT-E (scale-scoring 0-68, the higher the score the better quality of life)
Health-related quality of life: cancer cachexia specificBaseline, 10 weeks-, 1 year-, and 2 years after randomizationChanges in patient-reported cancer cachexia specific well-being assessed using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cancer Cachexia (scale-scoring 0-48, the higher the score the better quality of life)
DepressionBaseline, 10 weeks-, 1 year-, and 2 years after randomizationChanges in patient-reported depression, assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (scale scoring: 0-21, the higher the score the worse the condition)
AnxietyBaseline, 10 weeks-, 1 year-, and 2 years after randomizationChanges in patient-reported anxiety, assessed using the HADS (scale scoring: 0-21, the higher the score the worse the condition)
Self-reported physical activity: Moderate intensity physical activity (PA)Baseline, end of week 10Changes in patient-reported weekly duration of moderate intensity PA, assessed using the IPAQ
Self-reported physical activity: Vigorous intensity PABaseline, end of week 10Changes in patient-reported weekly duration of vigorous intensity PA, assessed using the IPAQ
Self-reported physical activity: Total PABaseline, end of week 10Changes in patient-reported weekly duration of total PA, assessed using the IPAQ (Expressed as metabolic equivalent (MET)-min per week: MET level x minutes of activity x events per week)
Self-reported physical activity: Sitting timeBaseline, end of week 10Changes in patient-reported weekly duration of sitting time, assessed using the IPAQ
Self-reported screening of sarcopeniaBaseline, end of week 10Changes in patient-reported signs of sarcopenia, assessed using The Strength, assistance in walking, rise from a chair, climb stairs, and falls (SARC-F) questionnaire (scale scoring: 0-10, the higher the score the better the condition)
Self-reported three-days dietary recordsBaseline, week 5 and week 10Changes in patient-reported three-day record of dietary intake assessed using questionnaries.
Patient-reported symptomatic adverse eventsOne week after each serie of chemotherapy during the intervention (10 weeks)Patient-reported symptomatic adverse events, assessed using the using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
Exercise feasibility: Relative dose intensity of exerciseBaseline until end of intervention (10 weeks)The actual dose relative to the prescribed minimum dose
Exercise feasibility: Early termination of exercise sessionsBaseline until end of intervention (10 weeks)Termination of an exercise session before the prescribed exercises have been performed
Exercise feasibility: Exercise intervention interruptionsBaseline until end of intervention (10 weeks)Incidence of exercise intervention disruptions, defined as a period of ≥ 7 days without an attended exercise session
Exercise feasibility: Permanent discontinuationBaseline until end of intervention (10 weeks)Incidence of permanent withdrawal from the intervention before intervention period has ended.
Body composition and anthropometrics: Total lean massBaseline, end of week 10Changes in total lean mass, assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Body composition and anthropometrics: Appendicular lean massBaseline, end of week 10Changes in appendicular lean mass, assessed by DXA
Body composition and anthropometrics: Total fat massBaseline, end of week 10Changes in total fat mass, assessed by DXA
Body composition and anthropometrics: Fat percentageBaseline, end of week 10Changes in fat percentage, assessed by DXA
Body composition and anthropometrics: Bone mineral densityBaseline, end of week 10Changes in bone mineral density, assessed by DXA
Body composition and anthropometrics: Muscle thicknessBaseline, end of week 10Changes in thickness of the vastus lateralis, assessed by ultrasound
Body composition and anthropometrics: Skeletal muscle indexAt diagnose, after 10 weeks intervention and at 1 year follow upChanges in skeletal muscle index, assessed by diagnostic CT scans
Body composition and anthropometrics: Skeletal muscle attenuationAt diagnose, end of week 10Changes in skeletal muscle attenuation, assessed by diagnostic CT scans
Body composition and anthropometrics: Adipose tissue indexAt diagnose, end of week 10Changes in adipose tissue index, assessed by diagnostic CT scans
Body composition and anthropometrics: Body massBaseline, end of week 10Changes in body mass
Body composition and anthropometrics: Body mass indexBaseline, end of week 10Changes in body mass index
Body composition and anthropometrics: Hip circumferenceBaseline, end of week 10Changes in hip circumference
Body composition and anthropometrics: Waist circumferenceBaseline, end of week 10Changes in waist circumference
Muscle strength: Leg press maximal muscle strenghtBaseline, end of week 10Changes in leg press one repetition maximum (1RM)
Muscle strength: Chest press maximal muscle strenghtBaseline, end of week 10Changes in chest press 1RM
Muscle strength: Hand grip strenghtBaseline, end of week 10Changes in hand grip strength, assessed using a dynamometer
Functional performance: Habituel gait speedBaseline, end of week 10Changes in habitual gait speed
Functional performance: Maximal gait speedBaseline, end of week 10Changes in maximal gait speed
Functional performance: Sit-to-standBaseline, end of week 10Changes in sit-to-stand power.
Functional performance: Stair climbBaseline, end of week 10Changes in stair climbing power
Resting metabolic rateBaseline, end of week 10Changes in resting metabolic rate
Blood pressure: Systolic blood pressureBaseline, end of week 10Changes in systolic blood pressure
Blood pressure: Diastolic blood pressureBaseline, end of week 10Changes in diastolic blood pressure
Heart rateBaseline, end of week 10Changes in resting heart rate

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood biochemistry: Total cholesterolBaseline, end of week 10Changes in total cholesterol
Blood biochemistry: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterolBaseline, end of week 10Changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Blood biochemistry: High-density lipoprotein cholesterolBaseline, end of week 10Changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Blood biochemistry: TriglycerideBaseline, end of week 10Changes in triglyceride
Blood biochemistry: Glycated hemoglobin A1cBaseline, end of week 10Changes in glycated hemoglobin A1c
Blood biochemistry: InsulinBaseline, end of week 10Changes in insulin
Blood biochemistry: Glucose toleranceBaseline, end of week 10Changes in glucose tolerance (2-hpur oral glucose tolerance test)
Blood biochemistry: GlucoseBaseline, end of week 10Changes in glucose
Blood biochemistry: C-peptideBaseline, end of week 10Changes in c-peptide
Blood biochemistry: Interleukin-1Baseline, end of week 10Changes in interlieukin-1
Blood biochemistry: Interleukin-6Baseline, end of week 10Changes in interlieukin-6
Blood biochemistry: Interleukin-8Baseline, end of week 10Changes in interlieukin-8
Blood biochemistry: Interleukin-10Baseline, end of week 10Changes in interlieukin-10
Blood biochemistry: Interferon-gammaBaseline, end of week 10Changes in interferon-gamma
Blood biochemistry: Tumor necrosis factor-alphaBaseline, end of week 10Changes in tumor necrosis factor-alpha
Blood biochemistry: Circulating tumor DNABaseline, week 5 and 10Changes in circulating tumor DNA
Effect of acute exercise: Insulin sensitivityImmediately after acute exerciseMuscle glucose uptake during insulin stimulation after acute exercise
Effect of acute exercise: muscle protein synthesisImmediately after acute exerciseMuscle protein synthesis during insulin stimulation after acute exercise.
Changes of proteins in muscle biopsiesBefore and immediately after acute exerciseModifications of proteins after acute exercise. Muscle biopsies will be subjected to mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis.
Changes of proteins in mithocondrial regulationBefore and immediately after acute exerciseModifications of mithochondrial regulation. Signaling of mitochondiral fission, fusion and mitophagy will be examined in mucle biopsies.
Blood biochemistry: albumin and proteinBaseline, end of week 10Changes in albumine and protein
Blood biochemistry: Leukocyte differential countsBaseline, end of week 10Changes in differential counts (total and per type: eosinofils, basofils, neutrofils, monocytes and lymphocytes)
Blood biochemistry: C-reactive proteinBaseline, end of week 10Changes in C-reactive protein
Blood biochemistry: magnesium and phosphateBaseline, end of week 10Changes in magnesium and phosphate

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026