Skip to content

Left vs Left Randomized Clinical Trial

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using His/Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing With a Left Ventricular Epicardial Lead in Patients With Heart Failure (HF) With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)≤50% and With Either a Wide QRS Complex (>130 ms) or With/Anticipated >40% Pacing Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05650658
Enrollment
2136
Registered
2022-12-14
Start date
2023-09-13
Completion date
2029-06-30
Last updated
2025-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

AV Block, Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Intraventricular Conduction Delay, LBBB, Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy, RBBB

Brief summary

The investigators aim to prospectively test the comparative effectiveness of His or Left bundle branch pacing in relation to patient centered outcomes (quality of life, physical activity, heart failure hospitalization, mortality) and comparative safety in relation to device-related complications and re-interventions (e.g., lead dislodgement, infection) relative to standard of care biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF≤50%) and with either a wide QRS (≥130 ms) or with/anticipated \>40% pacing who are already receiving current standard heart failure pharmacological therapy.

Detailed description

In this prospective, randomized, multi-center clinical trial, the investigators aim to prospectively evaluate the comparative effectiveness His or Left bundle branch pacing (His/LBBP) vs. biventricular pacing (BiVP) in patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF≤50%) and with either a wide QRS (≥130 ms) or with/anticipated \>40% pacing who are already receiving current standard heart failure pharmacological therapy by assessing all cause death and heart failure hospitalization at the end of the study. Additional formal secondary objectives include evaluation disease-specific quality and psychological adjustment changes at 1 year after device implant and evaluation of a composite of death of any cause or heart failure hospitalization or more \>15% increase in the left ventricular end-systolic volume index at the end of the study.

Interventions

DEVICEBiVP

Biventricular pacing has been shown to improve outcomes by delivering synchronized electrical stimuli to the right and left ventricles utilizing an an endocardial right atrial lead, an endocardial right ventricular lead, and an epicardial left ventricular lead implanted in a branch of the coronary sinus. For LVEF≤35% a biventricular pacemaker-defibrillator will be implanted while for LVEF 36-50% a biventricular pacemaker will be implanted.

DEVICEHis/LBBP

Pacing at the level His-Bundle or left bundle branch is used to correct the underlying conduction abnormality, resulting in a faster and more homogeneous activation of the heart pacing directly via the intrinsic conduction system of the heart accompanied by a right atrial endocardial lead and a right ventricular defibrillator endocardial lead for LVEF≤35% and by a right atrial endocardial lead for LVEF 36-50%.

Sponsors

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Utah
CollaboratorOTHER
Virginia Commonwealth University
CollaboratorOTHER
Cleveland Clinic Florida
CollaboratorOTHER
East Carolina University
CollaboratorOTHER
Baylor College of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women 18 years of age or older. * A LVEF ≤ 50% within 6 months prior to enrollment. * Resting QRS duration ≥130 ms as evidenced by a historical 12-lead ECG prior to enrollment OR anticipated right ventricular pacing \>40% OR device in place with right ventricular pacing \> 40%. * Are optimized on HF guideline directed medical therapy according to current HF published guidelines OR patient's physician will make an effort to start all guideline-directed medical therapy and titrate doses up as permitted by the participant clinical status and co-morbidities prior to implantation procedure.

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are pregnant, lactating, or plan to become pregnant during the course of the trial. * Participants with angiographic evidence of coronary disease who are candidates for coronary revascularization and are likely to undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous coronary, intervention in the next three (3) months. * Enzyme-positive myocardial infarction within the past three (3) months prior to enrollment. * Coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (balloon and/or stent angioplasty) within the past three (3) months prior to enrollment. * Reversible non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (e.g., acute viral myocarditis). * Participants with Chagas disease, cardiac sarcoidosis or amyloidosis. * Expected to receive left ventricular assist device or heart transplantation within 6 months. * Participants with primary severe valvular disease (e.g., aortic stenosis). * Have a life expectancy of less than 12 months. * Participants with irreversible brain damage from preexisting cerebral disease. * Participants with a contrast dye allergy unable or unwilling to undergo pretreatment with steroids and/or diphenhydramine. * Participants participating in any other interventional cardiovascular clinical trial. * Participants who would be unable to comply with the study's follow-up visit schedule; or * Participants who had any prior unsuccessful attempt at implantation of biventricular pacing (BiVP), His Bundle Pacing (HBP), or Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) device.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
A combined clinical endpoint of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure5.5 yearsThe primary efficacy outcome will be described using Kaplan-Meier freedom from event curves over time, with event-free survival compared between assigned treatment arms using a logrank test, stratified by levels of the two factors (LVEF (≤35% vs. 36 to 50%) and conduction abnormality (LBBB vs non-LBBB)) used for randomization.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cardiovascular hospitalization at 5.5 years5.5 yearsSecondary endpoint measured from first hospitalization for cardiovascular disease
Change in Six Minute Walk Test performance at 12 months12 monthsSecondary endpoint measured from Six Minute Walk Test
Patient activity measured through cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) at 12 months12 monthsMeasurement Patient activity measured through cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED)
Change in NT-proBNP at 12 months12 monthsMeasurement of heart failure serum biomarker NT-proBNP
Assess change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ-12) at 12 months12 monthsAssess change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ-12) item score measured before and at 12 months after implant.
Change in composite endpoint comprised of death, first hospitalization for worsening HF and left ventricular end systolic volume index (LVESVi) at 5.5 years5.5 yearsSecondary endpoint measured from all cause death, first hospitalization for heart failure and echocardiography on left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) in the His/LBBP vs. BIV-BiVP arm
Composite of cardiovascular death or heart transplant or durable left ventricular assist device or more > 15% increase in the LVESVi or change in KCCQ-12 at the end of the study using win ratio5.5 yearsSecondary endpoint measured from cardiovascular death or heart transplant or durable left ventricular assist device or more \> 15% increase in the LVESVi or change in KCCQ-12 at the end of the study using win ratio
Death from any cause at 5.5 years5.5 yearsSecondary endpoint measured from all cause death
Death from any cardiovascular cause at 5.5 years5.5 yearsSecondary endpoint measured from death due to cardiovascular causes
Hospitalization for heart failure at 5.5 years5.5 yearsSecondary endpoint measured from first hospitalization for heart failure
Total HF hospitalizations5.5 yearsTotal number of HF hospitalizations
Composite of cardiovascular death or first HF hospitalization5.5 yearsSecondary endpoint measured from cardiovascular death, first hospitalization for heart failure
Composite cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization or heart transplant or durable left ventricular assist device5.5 yearsSecondary endpoint measured from cardiovascular death, heart transplant or durable left ventricular assist device
Change in NYHA Classification at 12 months12 monthsSecondary endpoint measured from New York Heart Association class

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at 12 months12 monthsMeasurement of LVEF before and at 12 months after implant using echocardiography
Appropriate ICD therapy for ventricular arrhythmias5.5 yearsAntitachycardia pacing or ICD shocks
Incidence of atrial tachyarrhythmia events5.5 yearsAtrial arrhythmia event measured through cIED

Countries

Canada, United States

Contacts

Primary ContactMihail G Chelu, MD, PhD
leftvsleft@bcm.edu7137987291
Backup ContactMerin Thomas
merin.thomas@bcm.edu7137987291

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026