Skip to content

Immunological Functionnal Test Validation to Predict Melanoma Metastatic Patient Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immunological Functionnal Test Validation to Predict Melanoma Metastatic Patient Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors - Melanoma Quantiferon

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05649683
Acronym
mela-quantif
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-12-14
Start date
2023-01-31
Completion date
2027-06-01
Last updated
2024-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melanoma (Skin)

Brief summary

Checkpoint inhibitor such as anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 are known to block inhibitory signals and increase the immune antimutoral response. Nivolumab and Ipilimumab association is considered as a more efficient immunotherapy to treat advanced melanoma. This combined immunotherapy is also responsible of severe immunes toxicyties. Identification of predictives biomarqueurs remains a challenge to predict the balance between tolerability and efficency. Previous data showed that advanced melanoma patient had lower level of Th1 cytokines that predict a less efficient immune system than healthy donors. The second point was that high level of Th1 and Th17 cytokines were correlate to a better tumor response. The last point was that patients with severe immune toxicity showed an increase of IL-6 and IL17a production. The investigators would like to identify the predictive values of Th1, Th2 and Th17 at the begining and during the combined immunotherapy and correlate these cytokines levels secretions to a potential efficient tumor response or to the emergence of induced immunes toxicities. This study is an original approach using functionnal test to predict the balance between efficienty and tolerability.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALEvaluation of cytokine production

The patient will have samples at initiation of treatment (J0), after treatments 1 and 2 (S6), after the first radiological assessment at S11 and/or the progression of the disease and/or occurrence of a grade 3-4 adverse event

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion * persone of major age, * advanced melanoma confirmed, * RECIST 1.1 disease, * first line treatment

Exclusion criteria

* occular and mucosal melanoma, * previous checkpoint inhibitor treatment, * active brain metastasis, * concomitant immunosuppressive treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of predictifve Th1, Th2 and Th17 cytokine production correlate to the RECIST 1.1 tumoral responseChange from Baseline tumoral response at week 6 and at week 11Analysis of blood cytokine secretion upon non specific in vitro stimulation RECIST 1.1 tumor response

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of predictifve Th1, Th2 and Th17 cytokine production correlate to the progression freeChange from Baseline disease progression at week 6 and at week 11Analysis of blood cytokine secretion upon non specific in vitro stimulation disease progression
Evaluation of predictifve Th1, Th2 and Th17 cytokine production correlate to severe immunological toxicity occurrenceChange from Baseline immunological toxicity occurrence at week 6 and at week 11Analysis of blood cytokine secretion upon non specific in vitro stimulation severe immunological toxicity occurrence

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactMontaudie Henri, PhD
montaudie.h@chu-nice.fr33492036083
Backup ContactPradelli Emmanuelle
pradelli.e@chu-nice.fr33492036083

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026