Acute Concussion Syndrome
Conditions
Keywords
Concussion, mTBI, Neurostimulation, Optics and photonics, Photobiomodulation, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Medical Device
Brief summary
This is a controlled investigation, with randomization of the patients, which aims at evaluating the safety and performance of device RGn550 in treating sportspeople suffering from acute concussion syndrome. RGn550 is a non-invasive medical device which is applied on the head (helmet). It combines 2 technologies: * PhotoBioModulation (PBM), which involves exposure to light from the red to near-infrared wavelengths using lasers and Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) * Static Magnetic Stimulation (SMS), which consists in the application of a static magnetic field. Considering previous investigations, this innovative technology could reduce brain inflammation implicated in concussion syndrome.
Detailed description
This monocentric investigation is planned to include 50 patients who will be followed up to 52 days. Patients meeting all eligibility criteria will be randomized on a 1: 1 ratio into one of the two groups differing in terms of light exposure duty cycle (duty cycle is 50%) treatment frequency: RGn550 device with a 5 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission frequency and RGn550 device with a 10 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission frequency. The RGn550 device will be applied to the patients during two 20-min treatment sessions at 1 week apart. Three onsite visits will be performed at the following timepoints: * Day 0 (D0): Inclusion, randomization (to the 5 Hz-PWM or 10Hz-PWM treatment group) and first treatment session with RGn550 * Day 7 (D7): Second treatment session with RGn550 * Day 52 (D52): Evaluation 45 days after the last treatment session. In addition, at Day 14 (D14), the patient will be asked to remotely assess his/her concussion syndrome symptoms. At inclusion visit, after verification of the eligibility criteria, data regarding patients will be collected: demographic data, result of pregnancy test for women, concussion history, concomitant medications. At each visit: * The patient will be asked to assess his/her concussion syndrome symptoms via the SCAT5 evaluation tool * The functions possibly affected by the concussion syndrome will be assessed at each visit: O The executive function via the TMT A&B O The automated oculomotor and oculopostural functions via the NPC, cover test and Maddox Rod test O The balance via static stabilometric tests •all AEs and device deficiencies will be collected A blood sample will be collected at D0 and D52 to measure blood markers of concussion.
Interventions
RGn550 with a 5 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission
RGn550 with a 10 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
An interventional, prospective, monocentric, randomized, comparative and simple-blinded pilot clinical investigation
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female aged at least 18 years old * Suffering from concussion syndrome resulting from a shock that occurred during sport practice less than 72h ago, as confirmed by neurological examination via the Head Injury Assessment - Form 3 (HIA3) tool * Affiliated to French social security * Who provided a dated and signed informed consent form. Non-inclusion Criteria: * Patient protected by a French legal measure (sauvegarde de justice, tutelle or curatelle) * Patient not able to express his/her consent * Patient deprived of liberty or hospitalized without consent * Woman who is pregnant or breastfeeding, or who plans to become pregnant or breastfeeding during the investigation, or who has the capacity to conceive but is not using a reliable contraceptive method as deemed by the investigator * Patient living in a medical facility * Patient who experienced a surgery at the treatment application area (head) within 3 months prior to inclusion * Patient with skin lesions on the treatment application area (head) * Patient with a short-term life-threatening pathology (e.g., evolving cancer; non-stable heart failure; severe hepatic, renal or respiratory failure, etc.) * Patient diagnosed with a heart attack within 3 months prior to inclusion * Patient implanted with ferromagnetic material * Patient implanted with a pacemaker * Patient with a risk of epileptic seizure or other non-degenerative central nervous system diseases * Patient with major physical or neurosensorial disorders that may interfere with assessments * Patient with chronic psychosis or psychotic episodes * Patient addicted to alcohol or drugs * Patient treated with antidepressant or benzodiazepine * Patient who participated to another investigation/study involving the use of an investigational medical device/drug within the 30 days prior inclusion * Patient not able to meet treatment sessions as deemed by the investigator * Patient not able to complete requested investigation assessments as deemed by the investigator.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of RGn550's Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) | Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52) | Percentage of patients with at least one ADE |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe) | Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52) | Percentage of patients with at least one ADE per severity (mild, moderate and severe) |
| Incidence of RGn550's Adverse Events (AEs) | Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52) | Percentage of patients with at least one AE |
| Incidence of RGn550's Device Deficiencies (DDs) | Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52) | Percentage of patients with at least one DD |
| Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | at Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52 | Evolution of the deviation assessed via the Cover test considering both eyes The unilateral cover test was used in this investigation, which consists into covering one eye, horizontally moving a target 5 cm in front of both eyes, and then uncovering the covered eye and observing its reaction. If it fixes the target, this is normal: there is an orthophoria. If it moves to fix the target (restitution movement), the test is positive: there is a heterophoria in near vision. Patients who had visual corrections were to keep them during the test. The test was then repeated on the other eye. The outcome of this test was a deviation value, considering both eyes, comprised between 0 (better outcome = normal fixation) and 3 (worst outcome = deviated eye without restitution movement). |
| Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the Convergence | at Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52 | Evolution of the Near Point of Convergence (NPC) |
| Evolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B) | at Day 0 (before treatment session) and at Day 7 (after treatment session) Of note: for 46 patients, TMTB was performed before (rather than after) treatment at D7 (deviation) | Evolution of the Trail Making Test part A and B (TMT A&B) time to perform the task |
| Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | at baseline (which represents the patient's state before the concussion as estimated/assessed by the patient on D0), Day 0 (before treatment session), Day 7 (before treatment session), Day 14 and Day 52 | Evolution of the SCAT5 (Sport Concussion Assessment Tool - 5th edition) score The SCAT5 is a standardized tool for evaluating concussions designed for use by physicians and licensed healthcare professionals. With this tool, the patient rates the intensity of every symptom from 0 (none) to 6 (severe) using a form. This enables to calculate the total number of symptoms (subscore from 0 to 22) and the symptom severity score (subscore from 0 to 132). |
| Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | at Day 0 (before treatment session) and at Day 52 | Evolution of the concentration of: * Anti-inflammatory cytokines InterLeukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-11 and IL-13 * S100 calcium binding protein B (S100B) * Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) * Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) Of note: IL-11 and IL-13 could eventually not be analyzed due to undetectable low concentrations |
| Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | at Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52 | Evolution of statokinesigram area with closed eyes The statokinesigram is the projection onto a 2-dimensional space of the trajectory of the patient's center of pressure. Its area is measured in mm2. The larger the area is, the higher the patient's imbalance is. The statokinesigram area was measured using the stabilometric platform KFORCE Plates on which the patients were asked to stand for 30 s with closed eyes. |
Countries
France
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Recruitment period : 11 October 2022 - 02 May 2023 One site located in France
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| 5 Hz-PWM RGn550 with a 5 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission
RGn550 5 Hz-PWM: RGn550 with a 5 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission | 26 |
| 10 Hz-PWM RGn550 with a 10 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission
RGn550 10 Hz-PWM: RGn550 with a 10 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission | 24 |
| Total | 50 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | 5 Hz-PWM | 10 Hz-PWM | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 24.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 | 25.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1 | 25.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1 |
| Concussion history | 2.0 concussion STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 | 1.4 concussion STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 | 1.7 concussion STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 26 participants | 24 participants | 50 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 23 Participants | 21 Participants | 44 Participants |
| Time between concussion and inclusion | 2.4 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 | 2.3 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 | 2.3 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 26 | 0 / 24 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 12 / 26 | 10 / 24 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 26 | 0 / 24 |
Outcome results
Incidence of RGn550's Adverse Device Effects (ADEs)
Percentage of patients with at least one ADE
Time frame: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52)
Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Hz-PWM | Incidence of RGn550's Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) | 10 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Incidence of RGn550's Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) | 10 Participants |
Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations
Evolution of the deviations assessed via Maddox rod test (horizontal deviation, vertical deviation of at least one eye)
Time frame: at Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52
Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Horizontal deviation : D0 before treatment | 18 Participants |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Horizontal deviation : D0 after treatment | 11 Participants |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Horizontal deviation : D7 before treatment | 12 Participants |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Horizontal deviation : D7 after treatment | 10 Participants |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Horizontal deviation : D52 | 11 Participants |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Vertical deviation of at least one eye : D0 before treatment | 9 Participants |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Vertical deviation of at least one eye : D0 after treatment | 4 Participants |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Vertical deviation of at least one eye : D7 before treatment | 4 Participants |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Vertical deviation of at least one eye : D7 after treatment | 2 Participants |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Vertical deviation of at least one eye : D52 | 3 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Vertical deviation of at least one eye : D7 before treatment | 1 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Horizontal deviation : D0 before treatment | 17 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Vertical deviation of at least one eye : D0 before treatment | 7 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Horizontal deviation : D0 after treatment | 13 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Vertical deviation of at least one eye : D52 | 1 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Horizontal deviation : D7 before treatment | 11 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Vertical deviation of at least one eye : D0 after treatment | 4 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Horizontal deviation : D7 after treatment | 10 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Vertical deviation of at least one eye : D7 after treatment | 1 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | Horizontal deviation : D52 | 14 Participants |
Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations
Evolution of the deviation assessed via the Cover test considering both eyes The unilateral cover test was used in this investigation, which consists into covering one eye, horizontally moving a target 5 cm in front of both eyes, and then uncovering the covered eye and observing its reaction. If it fixes the target, this is normal: there is an orthophoria. If it moves to fix the target (restitution movement), the test is positive: there is a heterophoria in near vision. Patients who had visual corrections were to keep them during the test. The test was then repeated on the other eye. The outcome of this test was a deviation value, considering both eyes, comprised between 0 (better outcome = normal fixation) and 3 (worst outcome = deviated eye without restitution movement).
Time frame: at Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52
Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | D0 after treatment | 0.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | D7 after treatment | 0.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | D7 before treatment | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | D52 | 0.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | D0 before treatment | 1.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | D52 | 0.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | D0 before treatment | 1.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | D0 after treatment | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | D7 before treatment | 0.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations | D7 after treatment | 0.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the Convergence
Evolution of the Near Point of Convergence (NPC)
Time frame: at Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52
Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the Convergence | D0 after treatment | 1.8 NPC (cm) | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the Convergence | D7 after treatment | 1.0 NPC (cm) | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the Convergence | D7 before treatment | 1.3 NPC (cm) | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the Convergence | D52 | 0.9 NPC (cm) | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the Convergence | D0 before treatment | 4.6 NPC (cm) | Standard Deviation 5.6 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the Convergence | D52 | 0.4 NPC (cm) | Standard Deviation 1 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the Convergence | D0 before treatment | 2.9 NPC (cm) | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the Convergence | D0 after treatment | 0.4 NPC (cm) | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the Convergence | D7 before treatment | 0.3 NPC (cm) | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the Convergence | D7 after treatment | 0.1 NPC (cm) | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms
Evolution of the SCAT5 (Sport Concussion Assessment Tool - 5th edition) score The SCAT5 is a standardized tool for evaluating concussions designed for use by physicians and licensed healthcare professionals. With this tool, the patient rates the intensity of every symptom from 0 (none) to 6 (severe) using a form. This enables to calculate the total number of symptoms (subscore from 0 to 22) and the symptom severity score (subscore from 0 to 132).
Time frame: at baseline (which represents the patient's state before the concussion as estimated/assessed by the patient on D0), Day 0 (before treatment session), Day 7 (before treatment session), Day 14 and Day 52
Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Total number of symptoms : D7 before treatment | 1.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Symptom severity score: baseline | 0.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Total number of symptoms : D0 before treatment | 4.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Symptom severity score: D0 before treatment | 7.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Total number of symptoms : D14 | 0.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Symptom severity score: D7 before treatment | 2.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Total number of symptoms: baseline | 0.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Symptom severity score: D14 | 0.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Total number of symptoms : D52 | 0.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Symptom severity score: D52 | 0.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Symptom severity score: D52 | 2.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.2 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Total number of symptoms: baseline | 0.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Total number of symptoms : D0 before treatment | 5.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.7 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Total number of symptoms : D7 before treatment | 1.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Total number of symptoms : D14 | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Total number of symptoms : D52 | 0.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Symptom severity score: baseline | 0.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Symptom severity score: D0 before treatment | 10.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.2 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Symptom severity score: D7 before treatment | 3.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.9 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms | Symptom severity score: D14 | 2.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.1 |
Evolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B)
Evolution of the Trail Making Test part A and B (TMT A&B) time to perform the task
Time frame: at Day 0 (before treatment session) and at Day 7 (after treatment session) Of note: for 46 patients, TMTB was performed before (rather than after) treatment at D7 (deviation)
Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B) | TMTA time to perform the task: D0 | 19.0 s | Standard Deviation 5.4 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B) | TMTA time to perform the task: D7 | 15.7 s | Standard Deviation 4 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B) | TMTB time to perform the task: D0 | 53.5 s | Standard Deviation 20.1 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B) | TMTB time to perform the task: D7 | 42.5 s | Standard Deviation 12.7 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B) | TMTB time to perform the task: D7 | 43.1 s | Standard Deviation 17.9 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B) | TMTA time to perform the task: D0 | 21.2 s | Standard Deviation 7 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B) | TMTB time to perform the task: D0 | 50.9 s | Standard Deviation 26.6 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B) | TMTA time to perform the task: D7 | 18.5 s | Standard Deviation 4.8 |
Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters
Evolution of statokinesigram area with closed eyes The statokinesigram is the projection onto a 2-dimensional space of the trajectory of the patient's center of pressure. Its area is measured in mm2. The larger the area is, the higher the patient's imbalance is. The statokinesigram area was measured using the stabilometric platform KFORCE Plates on which the patients were asked to stand for 30 s with closed eyes.
Time frame: at Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52
Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D0 after treatment | 64.4 mm2 | Standard Deviation 50.5 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D7 after treatment | 47.9 mm2 | Standard Deviation 31.2 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D7 before treatment | 51.0 mm2 | Standard Deviation 34.3 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D52 | 50.9 mm2 | Standard Deviation 33.9 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D0 before treatment | 51.9 mm2 | Standard Deviation 28.9 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D52 | 51.9 mm2 | Standard Deviation 39.5 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D0 before treatment | 54.9 mm2 | Standard Deviation 41.4 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D0 after treatment | 62.9 mm2 | Standard Deviation 60.2 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D7 before treatment | 56.8 mm2 | Standard Deviation 33.2 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D7 after treatment | 59.9 mm2 | Standard Deviation 41.9 |
Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters
Evolution of the difference between left and right distributions of patient's body weight Patient's body weight left distribution, respectively right distribution, refer to patient's body weight distribution on his/her left foot, respectively right foot. The left distribution and the right distribution are two percentages which sum makes 100%. When body weight is well distributed between left and right feet (coherent balance), the difference between left and right distributions is ≤ 5%. When body weight is not well distributed between left and right feet (uncoherent balance), the difference between left and right distributions is \> 5%. These distributions were measured using the stabilometric platform KFORCE Plates on which the patients were asked to stand for 30 s with closed eyes.
Time frame: at Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52
Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D0 after treatment | 6.9 % of body weight distribution difference | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D7 after treatment | 5.0 % of body weight distribution difference | Standard Deviation 4.7 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D7 before treatment | 5.7 % of body weight distribution difference | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D52 | 6.0 % of body weight distribution difference | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D0 before treatment | 6.5 % of body weight distribution difference | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D52 | 6.4 % of body weight distribution difference | Standard Deviation 4.5 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D0 before treatment | 6.3 % of body weight distribution difference | Standard Deviation 4.7 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D0 after treatment | 6.3 % of body weight distribution difference | Standard Deviation 5 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D7 before treatment | 7.5 % of body weight distribution difference | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters | D7 after treatment | 5.2 % of body weight distribution difference | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers
Evolution of the concentration of: * Anti-inflammatory cytokines InterLeukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-11 and IL-13 * S100 calcium binding protein B (S100B) * Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) * Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) Of note: IL-11 and IL-13 could eventually not be analyzed due to undetectable low concentrations
Time frame: at Day 0 (before treatment session) and at Day 52
Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-10 : D52 | 0.28 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.08 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | UCHL1 : D0 before treatment | 11.0 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 20.4 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-4 : D0 before treatment | 0.02 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.01 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-10 : D0 before treatment | 0.74 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 1.88 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-4 : D52 | 0.05 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.05 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | UCHL1 : D52 | 9.3 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 13.3 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-6 : D0 before treatment | 1.25 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 2.32 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | GFAP : D52 | 67.7 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 29.6 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-6 : D52 | 0.97 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 1.85 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-1RA : D0 before treatment | 367.8 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 231.8 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | S100B : D0 before treatment | 25.7 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 35.4 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | GFAP : D0 before treatment | 95.3 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 75.6 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | S100B : D52 | 25.0 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 36 |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-1RA : D52 | 324.2 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 122.5 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | S100B : D52 | 17.2 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 10.5 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-10 : D0 before treatment | 0.33 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | GFAP : D0 before treatment | 82.5 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 40.2 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | GFAP : D52 | 49.8 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 21.5 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | UCHL1 : D0 before treatment | 3.9 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | UCHL1 : D52 | 5.0 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 4.5 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-1RA : D0 before treatment | 413.3 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 318.7 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-10 : D52 | 0.51 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-4 : D0 before treatment | 0.02 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.01 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-4 : D52 | 0.05 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.04 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-6 : D0 before treatment | 2.36 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 3.44 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-6 : D52 | 1.35 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 2.19 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | S100B : D0 before treatment | 17.6 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers | IL-1RA : D52 | 452.5 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 423.8 |
Incidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe)
Percentage of patients with at least one ADE per severity (mild, moderate and severe)
Time frame: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52)
Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Hz-PWM | Incidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe) | Patients who had at least one mild ADE | 10 Participants |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Incidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe) | Patients who had at least one moderate ADE | 0 Participants |
| 5 Hz-PWM | Incidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe) | Patients who had at least one severe ADE | 0 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Incidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe) | Patients who had at least one mild ADE | 10 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Incidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe) | Patients who had at least one moderate ADE | 0 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Incidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe) | Patients who had at least one severe ADE | 0 Participants |
Incidence of RGn550's Adverse Events (AEs)
Percentage of patients with at least one AE
Time frame: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52)
Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Hz-PWM | Incidence of RGn550's Adverse Events (AEs) | 12 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Incidence of RGn550's Adverse Events (AEs) | 10 Participants |
Incidence of RGn550's Device Deficiencies (DDs)
Percentage of patients with at least one DD
Time frame: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52)
Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Hz-PWM | Incidence of RGn550's Device Deficiencies (DDs) | 4 Participants |
| 10 Hz-PWM | Incidence of RGn550's Device Deficiencies (DDs) | 1 Participants |