Skip to content

Pilot Clinical Investigation Evaluating the Safety and Performance of RGn550 in Treating Sportspeople Suffering From Acute Concussion Syndrome

Pilot Clinical Investigation Evaluating the Safety and Performance of RGn550 in Treating Sportspeople Suffering From Acute Concussion Syndrome - A Prospective, Comparative, Randomized, Simple-blinded, Monocentric Investigation [RGncon Investigation]

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05647304
Acronym
RECOVERY
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-12-12
Start date
2022-10-11
Completion date
2023-06-20
Last updated
2025-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Concussion Syndrome

Keywords

Concussion, mTBI, Neurostimulation, Optics and photonics, Photobiomodulation, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Medical Device

Brief summary

This is a controlled investigation, with randomization of the patients, which aims at evaluating the safety and performance of device RGn550 in treating sportspeople suffering from acute concussion syndrome. RGn550 is a non-invasive medical device which is applied on the head (helmet). It combines 2 technologies: * PhotoBioModulation (PBM), which involves exposure to light from the red to near-infrared wavelengths using lasers and Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) * Static Magnetic Stimulation (SMS), which consists in the application of a static magnetic field. Considering previous investigations, this innovative technology could reduce brain inflammation implicated in concussion syndrome.

Detailed description

This monocentric investigation is planned to include 50 patients who will be followed up to 52 days. Patients meeting all eligibility criteria will be randomized on a 1: 1 ratio into one of the two groups differing in terms of light exposure duty cycle (duty cycle is 50%) treatment frequency: RGn550 device with a 5 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission frequency and RGn550 device with a 10 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission frequency. The RGn550 device will be applied to the patients during two 20-min treatment sessions at 1 week apart. Three onsite visits will be performed at the following timepoints: * Day 0 (D0): Inclusion, randomization (to the 5 Hz-PWM or 10Hz-PWM treatment group) and first treatment session with RGn550 * Day 7 (D7): Second treatment session with RGn550 * Day 52 (D52): Evaluation 45 days after the last treatment session. In addition, at Day 14 (D14), the patient will be asked to remotely assess his/her concussion syndrome symptoms. At inclusion visit, after verification of the eligibility criteria, data regarding patients will be collected: demographic data, result of pregnancy test for women, concussion history, concomitant medications. At each visit: * The patient will be asked to assess his/her concussion syndrome symptoms via the SCAT5 evaluation tool * The functions possibly affected by the concussion syndrome will be assessed at each visit: O The executive function via the TMT A&B O The automated oculomotor and oculopostural functions via the NPC, cover test and Maddox Rod test O The balance via static stabilometric tests •all AEs and device deficiencies will be collected A blood sample will be collected at D0 and D52 to measure blood markers of concussion.

Interventions

DEVICERGn550 5 Hz-PWM

RGn550 with a 5 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission

DEVICERGn550 10 Hz-PWM

RGn550 with a 10 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission

Sponsors

RCTs
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University Hospital, Montpellier
CollaboratorOTHER
REGEnLIFE SAS
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

An interventional, prospective, monocentric, randomized, comparative and simple-blinded pilot clinical investigation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female aged at least 18 years old * Suffering from concussion syndrome resulting from a shock that occurred during sport practice less than 72h ago, as confirmed by neurological examination via the Head Injury Assessment - Form 3 (HIA3) tool * Affiliated to French social security * Who provided a dated and signed informed consent form. Non-inclusion Criteria: * Patient protected by a French legal measure (sauvegarde de justice, tutelle or curatelle) * Patient not able to express his/her consent * Patient deprived of liberty or hospitalized without consent * Woman who is pregnant or breastfeeding, or who plans to become pregnant or breastfeeding during the investigation, or who has the capacity to conceive but is not using a reliable contraceptive method as deemed by the investigator * Patient living in a medical facility * Patient who experienced a surgery at the treatment application area (head) within 3 months prior to inclusion * Patient with skin lesions on the treatment application area (head) * Patient with a short-term life-threatening pathology (e.g., evolving cancer; non-stable heart failure; severe hepatic, renal or respiratory failure, etc.) * Patient diagnosed with a heart attack within 3 months prior to inclusion * Patient implanted with ferromagnetic material * Patient implanted with a pacemaker * Patient with a risk of epileptic seizure or other non-degenerative central nervous system diseases * Patient with major physical or neurosensorial disorders that may interfere with assessments * Patient with chronic psychosis or psychotic episodes * Patient addicted to alcohol or drugs * Patient treated with antidepressant or benzodiazepine * Patient who participated to another investigation/study involving the use of an investigational medical device/drug within the 30 days prior inclusion * Patient not able to meet treatment sessions as deemed by the investigator * Patient not able to complete requested investigation assessments as deemed by the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of RGn550's Adverse Device Effects (ADEs)Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52)Percentage of patients with at least one ADE

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe)Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52)Percentage of patients with at least one ADE per severity (mild, moderate and severe)
Incidence of RGn550's Adverse Events (AEs)Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52)Percentage of patients with at least one AE
Incidence of RGn550's Device Deficiencies (DDs)Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52)Percentage of patients with at least one DD
Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviationsat Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52Evolution of the deviation assessed via the Cover test considering both eyes The unilateral cover test was used in this investigation, which consists into covering one eye, horizontally moving a target 5 cm in front of both eyes, and then uncovering the covered eye and observing its reaction. If it fixes the target, this is normal: there is an orthophoria. If it moves to fix the target (restitution movement), the test is positive: there is a heterophoria in near vision. Patients who had visual corrections were to keep them during the test. The test was then repeated on the other eye. The outcome of this test was a deviation value, considering both eyes, comprised between 0 (better outcome = normal fixation) and 3 (worst outcome = deviated eye without restitution movement).
Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the Convergenceat Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52Evolution of the Near Point of Convergence (NPC)
Evolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B)at Day 0 (before treatment session) and at Day 7 (after treatment session) Of note: for 46 patients, TMTB was performed before (rather than after) treatment at D7 (deviation)Evolution of the Trail Making Test part A and B (TMT A&B) time to perform the task
Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptomsat baseline (which represents the patient's state before the concussion as estimated/assessed by the patient on D0), Day 0 (before treatment session), Day 7 (before treatment session), Day 14 and Day 52Evolution of the SCAT5 (Sport Concussion Assessment Tool - 5th edition) score The SCAT5 is a standardized tool for evaluating concussions designed for use by physicians and licensed healthcare professionals. With this tool, the patient rates the intensity of every symptom from 0 (none) to 6 (severe) using a form. This enables to calculate the total number of symptoms (subscore from 0 to 22) and the symptom severity score (subscore from 0 to 132).
Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markersat Day 0 (before treatment session) and at Day 52Evolution of the concentration of: * Anti-inflammatory cytokines InterLeukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-11 and IL-13 * S100 calcium binding protein B (S100B) * Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) * Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) Of note: IL-11 and IL-13 could eventually not be analyzed due to undetectable low concentrations
Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parametersat Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52Evolution of statokinesigram area with closed eyes The statokinesigram is the projection onto a 2-dimensional space of the trajectory of the patient's center of pressure. Its area is measured in mm2. The larger the area is, the higher the patient's imbalance is. The statokinesigram area was measured using the stabilometric platform KFORCE Plates on which the patients were asked to stand for 30 s with closed eyes.

Countries

France

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment period : 11 October 2022 - 02 May 2023 One site located in France

Participants by arm

ArmCount
5 Hz-PWM
RGn550 with a 5 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission RGn550 5 Hz-PWM: RGn550 with a 5 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission
26
10 Hz-PWM
RGn550 with a 10 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission RGn550 10 Hz-PWM: RGn550 with a 10 Hz-pulsed wave mode light emission
24
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic5 Hz-PWM10 Hz-PWMTotal
Age, Continuous24.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
25.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
25.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
Concussion history2.0 concussion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
1.4 concussion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
1.7 concussion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
26 participants24 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants21 Participants44 Participants
Time between concussion and inclusion2.4 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
2.3 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
2.3 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 260 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 2610 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 260 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence of RGn550's Adverse Device Effects (ADEs)

Percentage of patients with at least one ADE

Time frame: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52)

Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
5 Hz-PWMIncidence of RGn550's Adverse Device Effects (ADEs)10 Participants
10 Hz-PWMIncidence of RGn550's Adverse Device Effects (ADEs)10 Participants
Secondary

Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations

Evolution of the deviations assessed via Maddox rod test (horizontal deviation, vertical deviation of at least one eye)

Time frame: at Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52

Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsHorizontal deviation : D0 before treatment18 Participants
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsHorizontal deviation : D0 after treatment11 Participants
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsHorizontal deviation : D7 before treatment12 Participants
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsHorizontal deviation : D7 after treatment10 Participants
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsHorizontal deviation : D5211 Participants
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsVertical deviation of at least one eye : D0 before treatment9 Participants
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsVertical deviation of at least one eye : D0 after treatment4 Participants
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsVertical deviation of at least one eye : D7 before treatment4 Participants
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsVertical deviation of at least one eye : D7 after treatment2 Participants
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsVertical deviation of at least one eye : D523 Participants
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsVertical deviation of at least one eye : D7 before treatment1 Participants
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsHorizontal deviation : D0 before treatment17 Participants
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsVertical deviation of at least one eye : D0 before treatment7 Participants
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsHorizontal deviation : D0 after treatment13 Participants
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsVertical deviation of at least one eye : D521 Participants
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsHorizontal deviation : D7 before treatment11 Participants
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsVertical deviation of at least one eye : D0 after treatment4 Participants
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsHorizontal deviation : D7 after treatment10 Participants
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsVertical deviation of at least one eye : D7 after treatment1 Participants
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsHorizontal deviation : D5214 Participants
Secondary

Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through Deviations

Evolution of the deviation assessed via the Cover test considering both eyes The unilateral cover test was used in this investigation, which consists into covering one eye, horizontally moving a target 5 cm in front of both eyes, and then uncovering the covered eye and observing its reaction. If it fixes the target, this is normal: there is an orthophoria. If it moves to fix the target (restitution movement), the test is positive: there is a heterophoria in near vision. Patients who had visual corrections were to keep them during the test. The test was then repeated on the other eye. The outcome of this test was a deviation value, considering both eyes, comprised between 0 (better outcome = normal fixation) and 3 (worst outcome = deviated eye without restitution movement).

Time frame: at Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52

Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsD0 after treatment0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsD7 after treatment0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsD7 before treatment1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsD520.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsD0 before treatment1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsD520.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsD0 before treatment1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsD0 after treatment1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsD7 before treatment0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through DeviationsD7 after treatment0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Evolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the Convergence

Evolution of the Near Point of Convergence (NPC)

Time frame: at Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52

Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the ConvergenceD0 after treatment1.8 NPC (cm)Standard Deviation 2.6
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the ConvergenceD7 after treatment1.0 NPC (cm)Standard Deviation 1.8
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the ConvergenceD7 before treatment1.3 NPC (cm)Standard Deviation 2.1
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the ConvergenceD520.9 NPC (cm)Standard Deviation 1.8
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the ConvergenceD0 before treatment4.6 NPC (cm)Standard Deviation 5.6
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the ConvergenceD520.4 NPC (cm)Standard Deviation 1
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the ConvergenceD0 before treatment2.9 NPC (cm)Standard Deviation 3.1
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the ConvergenceD0 after treatment0.4 NPC (cm)Standard Deviation 1.2
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the ConvergenceD7 before treatment0.3 NPC (cm)Standard Deviation 0.8
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Automated Oculomotor and Oculopostural Functions, as Assessed Through the ConvergenceD7 after treatment0.1 NPC (cm)Standard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Evolution of Concussion Syndrome Symptoms

Evolution of the SCAT5 (Sport Concussion Assessment Tool - 5th edition) score The SCAT5 is a standardized tool for evaluating concussions designed for use by physicians and licensed healthcare professionals. With this tool, the patient rates the intensity of every symptom from 0 (none) to 6 (severe) using a form. This enables to calculate the total number of symptoms (subscore from 0 to 22) and the symptom severity score (subscore from 0 to 132).

Time frame: at baseline (which represents the patient's state before the concussion as estimated/assessed by the patient on D0), Day 0 (before treatment session), Day 7 (before treatment session), Day 14 and Day 52

Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsTotal number of symptoms : D7 before treatment1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsSymptom severity score: baseline0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsTotal number of symptoms : D0 before treatment4.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsSymptom severity score: D0 before treatment7.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsTotal number of symptoms : D140.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsSymptom severity score: D7 before treatment2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsTotal number of symptoms: baseline0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsSymptom severity score: D140.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsTotal number of symptoms : D520.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsSymptom severity score: D520.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsSymptom severity score: D522.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsTotal number of symptoms: baseline0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsTotal number of symptoms : D0 before treatment5.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsTotal number of symptoms : D7 before treatment1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsTotal number of symptoms : D141.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsTotal number of symptoms : D520.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsSymptom severity score: baseline0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsSymptom severity score: D0 before treatment10.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsSymptom severity score: D7 before treatment3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Concussion Syndrome SymptomsSymptom severity score: D142.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Secondary

Evolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B)

Evolution of the Trail Making Test part A and B (TMT A&B) time to perform the task

Time frame: at Day 0 (before treatment session) and at Day 7 (after treatment session) Of note: for 46 patients, TMTB was performed before (rather than after) treatment at D7 (deviation)

Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B)TMTA time to perform the task: D019.0 sStandard Deviation 5.4
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B)TMTA time to perform the task: D715.7 sStandard Deviation 4
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B)TMTB time to perform the task: D053.5 sStandard Deviation 20.1
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B)TMTB time to perform the task: D742.5 sStandard Deviation 12.7
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B)TMTB time to perform the task: D743.1 sStandard Deviation 17.9
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B)TMTA time to perform the task: D021.2 sStandard Deviation 7
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B)TMTB time to perform the task: D050.9 sStandard Deviation 26.6
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of Executive Function, as Assessed With the Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT A&B)TMTA time to perform the task: D718.5 sStandard Deviation 4.8
Secondary

Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters

Evolution of statokinesigram area with closed eyes The statokinesigram is the projection onto a 2-dimensional space of the trajectory of the patient's center of pressure. Its area is measured in mm2. The larger the area is, the higher the patient's imbalance is. The statokinesigram area was measured using the stabilometric platform KFORCE Plates on which the patients were asked to stand for 30 s with closed eyes.

Time frame: at Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52

Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD0 after treatment64.4 mm2Standard Deviation 50.5
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD7 after treatment47.9 mm2Standard Deviation 31.2
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD7 before treatment51.0 mm2Standard Deviation 34.3
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD5250.9 mm2Standard Deviation 33.9
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD0 before treatment51.9 mm2Standard Deviation 28.9
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD5251.9 mm2Standard Deviation 39.5
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD0 before treatment54.9 mm2Standard Deviation 41.4
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD0 after treatment62.9 mm2Standard Deviation 60.2
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD7 before treatment56.8 mm2Standard Deviation 33.2
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD7 after treatment59.9 mm2Standard Deviation 41.9
Secondary

Evolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric Parameters

Evolution of the difference between left and right distributions of patient's body weight Patient's body weight left distribution, respectively right distribution, refer to patient's body weight distribution on his/her left foot, respectively right foot. The left distribution and the right distribution are two percentages which sum makes 100%. When body weight is well distributed between left and right feet (coherent balance), the difference between left and right distributions is ≤ 5%. When body weight is not well distributed between left and right feet (uncoherent balance), the difference between left and right distributions is \> 5%. These distributions were measured using the stabilometric platform KFORCE Plates on which the patients were asked to stand for 30 s with closed eyes.

Time frame: at Day 0 and Day 7 (before and after treatment session) and at Day 52

Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD0 after treatment6.9 % of body weight distribution differenceStandard Deviation 4.3
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD7 after treatment5.0 % of body weight distribution differenceStandard Deviation 4.7
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD7 before treatment5.7 % of body weight distribution differenceStandard Deviation 3.5
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD526.0 % of body weight distribution differenceStandard Deviation 5.1
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD0 before treatment6.5 % of body weight distribution differenceStandard Deviation 4.1
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD526.4 % of body weight distribution differenceStandard Deviation 4.5
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD0 before treatment6.3 % of body weight distribution differenceStandard Deviation 4.7
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD0 after treatment6.3 % of body weight distribution differenceStandard Deviation 5
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD7 before treatment7.5 % of body weight distribution differenceStandard Deviation 5.7
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Balance Function, as Assessed Through Static Stabilometric ParametersD7 after treatment5.2 % of body weight distribution differenceStandard Deviation 4.1
Secondary

Evolution of the Concussion Blood Markers

Evolution of the concentration of: * Anti-inflammatory cytokines InterLeukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-11 and IL-13 * S100 calcium binding protein B (S100B) * Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) * Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) Of note: IL-11 and IL-13 could eventually not be analyzed due to undetectable low concentrations

Time frame: at Day 0 (before treatment session) and at Day 52

Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-10 : D520.28 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.08
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersUCHL1 : D0 before treatment11.0 pg/mLStandard Deviation 20.4
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-4 : D0 before treatment0.02 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.01
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-10 : D0 before treatment0.74 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.88
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-4 : D520.05 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.05
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersUCHL1 : D529.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 13.3
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-6 : D0 before treatment1.25 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.32
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersGFAP : D5267.7 pg/mLStandard Deviation 29.6
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-6 : D520.97 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.85
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-1RA : D0 before treatment367.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 231.8
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersS100B : D0 before treatment25.7 pg/mLStandard Deviation 35.4
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersGFAP : D0 before treatment95.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 75.6
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersS100B : D5225.0 pg/mLStandard Deviation 36
5 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-1RA : D52324.2 pg/mLStandard Deviation 122.5
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersS100B : D5217.2 pg/mLStandard Deviation 10.5
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-10 : D0 before treatment0.33 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.16
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersGFAP : D0 before treatment82.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 40.2
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersGFAP : D5249.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 21.5
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersUCHL1 : D0 before treatment3.9 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4.4
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersUCHL1 : D525.0 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4.5
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-1RA : D0 before treatment413.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 318.7
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-10 : D520.51 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.47
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-4 : D0 before treatment0.02 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.01
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-4 : D520.05 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.04
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-6 : D0 before treatment2.36 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3.44
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-6 : D521.35 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.19
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersS100B : D0 before treatment17.6 pg/mLStandard Deviation 10.9
10 Hz-PWMEvolution of the Concussion Blood MarkersIL-1RA : D52452.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 423.8
Secondary

Incidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe)

Percentage of patients with at least one ADE per severity (mild, moderate and severe)

Time frame: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52)

Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
5 Hz-PWMIncidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe)Patients who had at least one mild ADE10 Participants
5 Hz-PWMIncidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe)Patients who had at least one moderate ADE0 Participants
5 Hz-PWMIncidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe)Patients who had at least one severe ADE0 Participants
10 Hz-PWMIncidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe)Patients who had at least one mild ADE10 Participants
10 Hz-PWMIncidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe)Patients who had at least one moderate ADE0 Participants
10 Hz-PWMIncidence of RGn550's ADEs Per Severity (Mild, Moderate and Severe)Patients who had at least one severe ADE0 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of RGn550's Adverse Events (AEs)

Percentage of patients with at least one AE

Time frame: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52)

Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
5 Hz-PWMIncidence of RGn550's Adverse Events (AEs)12 Participants
10 Hz-PWMIncidence of RGn550's Adverse Events (AEs)10 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of RGn550's Device Deficiencies (DDs)

Percentage of patients with at least one DD

Time frame: Throughout the investigation (from Day 0 to Day 52)

Population: Patients randomized and treated at least once (at inclusion visit)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
5 Hz-PWMIncidence of RGn550's Device Deficiencies (DDs)4 Participants
10 Hz-PWMIncidence of RGn550's Device Deficiencies (DDs)1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026