Skip to content

DIAbetes Maximal ACCeleration

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Maximal Systolic Acceleration for Detection of Peripheral Arterial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05646147
Acronym
DIAMACC
Enrollment
238
Registered
2022-12-12
Start date
2023-07-31
Completion date
2025-07-31
Last updated
2023-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot, Diagnosis, Peripheral Arterial Disease

Keywords

Peripheral Arterial Disease, Diabetic Foot, Diagnosis

Brief summary

Prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing rapidly, with patient numbers projected to rise to 643 million by 2030. As a consequence of diabetes-related atherosclerosis, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and in particular medial arterial calcification (MAC) can occur. The accurate identification of PAD by bedside tests is extremely important in patients with diabetes and foot ulceration, in order to reduce delayed wound healing, prevent lower limb amputation and eventually reduce mortality. However, as shown in previous systematic reviews, the performance of current bedside tests is not reliable in excluding PAD in diabetic patients.1,2 Moreover, the methodological quality of the conducted studies is generally poor. Therefore, more reliable and prospective data is required. Also alternative bedside tests need to be investigated. As an example, the ACCmax (a new doppler derived parameter) could be particularly promising in this patient group.

Detailed description

According to the latest 2021 data from the International Diabetes Federation, an estimated 537 million adults are living with DM globally.3 Prevalence is increasing rapidly, with numbers projected to rise to 643 million by 2030 and 783 million by 2045. Annually, DM causes 6.7 million deaths, as a consequence of both macrovascular- (atherosclerosis) and microvascular disease (retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy). In 2021, diabetes caused at least 966 billion dollars in health expenditure, comprising approximately 9% of total spending on adults. Type 2 diabetes comprises about 85-90% of these cases, in which disease onset is often insidious, and diagnosis is consequently delayed.4 Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) of the lower extremity is a clinical manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis and considered a well-known (long-term) complication of DM. Besides atherosclerosis, calcification of the tunica media of the arterial wall can occur. This process is called medial arterial calcification (MAC) and is accelerated in the presence of DM. Research suggests that MAC is present in approximately one third of patients with DM.5 MAC has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality, while another study found that patients with DM and PAD have an impaired quality of life and an increased risk of adverse cardiac and limb events.6,7 Timely recognition of limb ischemia is important in patients with DM/MAC in order to reduce delayed wound healing, prevent lower limb amputation and eventually reduce mortality.8 Current non-invasive bedside tests - such as the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and toe pressure (TP) - are considered accurate for the diagnosis of PAD. However, as shown in previous systematic reviews, the performance of current bedside tests is not reliable in excluding PAD in diabetic patients.1,2 The methodological quality of the studies in these reviews were poor. In general, most of the data was collected retrospectively and not all patients received reference testing. In order to assess the reliability of bedside tests in this patient group, more well-sound methodological research is required. Also alternative bedside tests need to be investigated. The doppler derived maximal systolic acceleration (ACCmax) is a new non-invasive parameter, which could be promising in detecting PAD. Although ACCmax has already been used for renal artery stenosis9, thorough evaluation has not been performed in PAD. Two previous studies showed accurate diagnostic property in diabetic patients, but the sample sizes were small.10,11 The aim of this study is to assess the clinical value of bedside tests compared to DUS to detect PAD in patients with diabetes-related foot ulceration, with special emphasis on the ACCmax.

Interventions

Reliability of the maximal systolic acceleration

Sponsors

Leiden University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years or older. * DM in medical history. * Presenting with a new-onset wound or ulceration on the foot or ankle with initiation of a new diagnostic care path.

Exclusion criteria

\- Lacking capacity to consent for inclusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reliability of standard bedside tests and the maximal systolic acceleration (ACCmax)Through study completion, approximately 1.5 yearsSensitivity and specificity including their derivates: PLR and NLR

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of ACCmax reliability with current bedside testsThrough study completion, approximately 1.5 yearsComparison of ACCmax reliability with current bedside tests
Comparison of patient demographics (such as age/sex) and comorbidities (duration of diabetes, chronic kidney disease) with diagnostic accuracy of different bedside testsThrough study completion, approximately 1.5 yearsComparison of patient demographics (such as age/sex) and comorbidities (duration of diabetes, chronic kidney disease) with diagnostic accuracy of different bedside tests
Wound healing and ACCmaxUp to 5 years after study completionTo assess if the maximal systolic acceleration can predict wound healing

Contacts

Primary ContactSiem Willems, MD
s.a.willems@lumc.nl+31642642819

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026