Skip to content

Periodontal and Orthodontic Outcomes of Straight vs. Looped Fixed Retainers

Periodontal and Orthodontic Outcomes of Straight Versus Looped Fixed Retainers: a Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05644119
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-12-09
Start date
2022-11-01
Completion date
2023-10-31
Last updated
2022-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthodontic Appliance Complication, Orthodontic Appliance Design, Orthodontic Treatment

Keywords

Orthodontic retention, Fixed orthodontic retention, Fixed orthodontic retainer, V- loop bonded retainer

Brief summary

The goal of this split-mouth, head-to-head, randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of a fixed straight retainer with the V- loop bonded retainer on periodontal health in patients with the requirement of continuous fixed retention for 12-24 months after orthodontic treatment. The main question it aims to answer is whether the V- loop bonded retainer is more effective than fixed straight retainer for periodontal health management. Each patient will receive 2 lower fixed and bonded retainers: (1) a straight wire retainer (SWR) and (2) a looped wire retainer (LWR). Patients will be asked to floss once daily with a thread flosser. Researchers will compare the effects of two types of retainers to see if there is a statistically significant difference.

Detailed description

Ensuring alignment stability is a major challenge for orthodontists following an orthodontic treatment. This has led to the development of various orthodontic retention methods to enhance stability. Both fixed and removable retainers have been in use for years. However, most orthodontists nowadays prefer fixed bonded retainers over removable ones due to their many advantages, including easy to wear, being patient compliance free, long-term usability and stability, and better aesthetics. Over the past decades, many variations of fixed retainers have been developed. Of these, the current gold standard is the straight type flexible spiral (multistranded) wire retainer. Nevertheless, a major concern of using fixed straight retainers is the potential for periodontal health compromise. They are known to make oral hygiene maintenance more difficult for the patient, which in turn may lead to periodontal diseases due to more plaque and calculus accumulation. The wave or V- loop bonded retainer may be a solution to this problem, as it provides stability of teeth yet allows flossing with ease.

Interventions

DEVICEV- loop Bonded Orthodontic Retainer

The V- loop bonded retainer is a unique design that not just provides tooth stability but also allows flossing with ease.

DEVICEStraight Wire Retainer

The straight wire retainer is a fixed bonded orthodontic retainer. This involves attaching a metal wire to the back of the teeth to keep it in position.

Sponsors

King Abdulaziz University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Split-mouth Design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients in need of continuous fixed retention for 12-24 months after orthodontic treatment * Good periodontal health (i.e., no clinical attachment loss and \< 10% bleeding on probing)

Exclusion criteria

* History of oral prophylaxis in the past 6 months * History of any systemic illness such as diabetes * Preexisting or post-orthodontic periodontal disease * Current intake of antibiotic and/or anti-inflammatory medications * Smoking * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of retainer failures and teeth stability through clinical examinationApproximately 2 yearsThe examination will be carried out for each participant to assess the final outcome of bonds of assigned intervention immediately following the orthodontic treatment and after intervals of six months and two years.
Measurement of the Little's Irregularity Index to assess the crowding of Mandibular anterior archApproximately 2 yearsThe examination will be carried out for each participant to assess the final outcome assigned interventions immediately following the orthodontic treatment and after intervals of six months and two years. The scale of the index includes the following: * 0: Perfect Alignment * 1-3: Minimal Irregularity * 4-6: Moderate Irregularity * 7-9: Severe Irregularity * 10: Very Severe Irregularity The value represents the total horizontal displacement of the anatomical contact points of the mandibular anterior teeth in millimeters.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in gingivitis on the 4-point Modified Gingival Index (MGI) at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)Approximately 2 yearsThe MGI is a non-invasive visual instrument designed to evaluate the progression of gingivitis. The scale ranges from 0 (normal gingiva) to 3. (severe inflammation with tendency to spontaneous bleeding). Change = (Year 2 Score - Baseline Score)
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in plaque accumulation on O'leary Plaque Index (PI) at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)Approximately 2 yearsThe PI is a valid and reliable assessment tool that records the presence of mineralized deposits and soft debris on all 4 surfaces of every tooth. It utilizes a rating scale from 0 (no plaque) to 1 (plaque present at gingival margin). Change = (Year 2 Score - Baseline Score)
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in gingival bleeding on the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) by Ainamo and Bay at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)Approximately 2 yearsThe GBI is a reliable measure of periodontal stability. It uses delicate probing of the gingival sulcus orifice. Using a standardized periodontal probe with a 0.6 mm tip and 1 mm marking, the bleeding on probing (BOP) will be evaluated. A skilled examiner will measure BOP using probes with 0.25 N or less of force (25 g). If bleeding starts within 10 seconds, a positive finding is recorded.
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in oral hygiene questionnaire at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)Approximately 2 yearsParticipants will be adminstered a self-reported oral hygiene questionnaire on brushing and flossing frequency, patient satisfaction with the retainers, and ease of flossing to determine their overall satisfaction with the interventions.

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Contacts

Primary ContactTalal Zahid, M.S
tzahid@kau.edu.sa00966554667998

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026