Frequency of Embolic Complications, Frequency of Ischemic Complications
Conditions
Keywords
Aortic aneyrism, Artificial intelligence, safe zone of clamping, embolic complications
Brief summary
Pilot randomized prospective clinical study of the effectiveness of the use of artificial intelligence in determining safe clamping zones in the surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Detailed description
Abdominal aortic aneurysm is a life-threatening disease, a formidable complication of which is an aneurysm rupture (Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery). The main method of treating aneurysms is surgical reconstruction, including open or endovascular intervention ((ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms). Anatomical features of aneurysms and the presence of intraluminal thrombomass are among the criteria in deciding on the tactics of surgical treatment. These factors carry additional technical difficulties and lead to the development of intraoperative complications, including ischemic ones. Ischemia of the lower extremities is the most common complication and can be caused by thrombosis, embolism or dissection of the aortic wall (occurs in 7% of patients) (Complications Associated with Aortic Aneurysm Repair). Thus, in order to reduce the frequency of embolic complications, it is important for the surgeon to determine a safe zone for applying a clamp to the aorta and main vessels. Thus, artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to interpret and analyze images of aneurysms that allow automatic quantitative measurements and determination of the exact characteristics of morphology and hydrodynamics, as well as the presence of intraluminal blood clots and calcifications. Analysis based on artificial intelligence can lead to the development of computational programs for predicting the development of aneurysms and the risk of their rupture, as well as postoperative outcomes. Artificial intelligence can also be used to determine the safe areas of aortic clamping. (Artificial intelligence in abdominal aortic aneurysm). Adam and co-authors trained a neural network to detect and estimate the maximum outer diameter of aneurysms using a database of 489 CT angiographs of abdominal aortic aneurysms. AI has achieved a level of performance and accuracy suitable for clinical practice, and with the use of more CT images, further improvement in accuracy is expected (Pre-surgical and Post-surgical Aortic Aneurysm Maximum Diameter Measurement: Full Automation by Artificial Intelligence). In a study by Fujiwara et al. 145 non-contrast CT scans with suspected aneurysm were retrospectively collected. Initially, AI was trained by manually segmenting CT images. Image processing was used to determine the abdominal aortic aneurysm area and to automatically measure the size. This method has shown that AI is a useful tool for fully automatic detection and measurement of aneurysm diameter. (Fully automatic detection and measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysm using artificial intelligence). Florent Lalys and his coauthor. an automatic fast and universal algorithm for determining an intraluminal thrombus was developed. The method was tested on pre- and postoperative CT scans of the abdominal aorta and iliac artery of 145 patients and consists in determining the central line and segmentation of the aortic lumen, an optimized stage of pretreatment and the use of a 3D model (Generic thrombus segmentation from pre- and post-operative CTA). Taking into account the references already available in some studies of the use of artificial intelligence for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, its use is seen as a promising method for making decisions in determining safe clamping zones in the surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms, which will reduce the frequency of postoperative complications.
Interventions
aneurysmectomy is performed with prosthetics of the abdominal aorta using the standard technology.
aneurysmectomy is performed with prosthetics of the abdominal aorta using the standard technology. Before surgery, multispiral computed tomography data is evaluated using artificial intelligence and safe zones of aortic and arterial clampings are determined. Intraoperatively, clamping is performed in the settlement zones.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
1. In both groups, aneurysmectomy with prosthetics of the abdominal aorta is performed using the standard technology. 2. In the first group, the aortic and main artery clamping zone is determined by the surgeon intraoperatively. In the second group, before surgery, multispiral computed tomography data is evaluated using artificial intelligence and the definition of safe areas of aortic and main artery clamping is performed. Intraoperatively, clamping is performed in the settlement zones.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with aneurysmal dilation of the abdominal aorta, who are shown surgery. * Patients who have agreed to participate in this study
Exclusion criteria
* Chronic heart failure of functional class III -IV according to NYHA classification; * Chronic decompensated pulmonary heart; * Severe hepatic or renal insufficiency (bilirubin \>35 mmol/l, glomerular filtration rate \<60 ml/min); * Polyvalent drug allergy; * Malignant oncological diseases in the terminal stage with a predicted life span of up to 6 months; * Acute cerebrovascular accident;
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| frequency of intraoperative and early postoperative embolism | 12 months | Number of intraoperative embolism according to intraoperative ultrasound monitoring. The number of developed occlusions of peripheral arteries according to ultrasound scanning |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Primary patency of the operated segment. | 12 months | The number of restenosis (50% or more) or reocclusion according to ultrasound duplex scanning of the operated segment at control points |
| secondary patency of the operated segment | 12 months | The number of restenosis (50% or more) or reocclusion according to ultrasound duplex scanning of the operated segment after repeated intervention at control points |
| MALE | 12 months | The number of major adverse events that occurred in the extremities the observation period |
Countries
Russia