Skip to content

Intermittent Bolus vs Continuous Infusion Via ESP Catheters RCT

Intermittent Bolus Versus Continuous Infusion Erector Spinae Catheters for Median Sternotomy Incisions: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05642416
Enrollment
240
Registered
2022-12-08
Start date
2022-10-18
Completion date
2024-12-23
Last updated
2026-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Operative Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of two different delivery methods for postoperative pain management following cardiac surgery requiring median sternotomy: intermittent programmed LA bolus versus continuous LA infusion through ESP catheters. Effectiveness of analgesia will be assessed based on the subjects' NRS pain scores and opioid consumption. The primary outcome measure will be the patients' opioid consumption over the course of the 72 hours following surgery. Secondary outcomes measures that will be evaluated include NRS pain scores, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and time to first dose of antiemetic in the postoperative period. It is hypothesized that the use of intermittent programmed LA boluses will provide better analgesia compared to continuous LA infusion through ESP catheters. The findings of this study will provide guidance regarding the optimal method of delivery for postoperative pain management in patients following cardiac surgery.

Detailed description

The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of two different delivery methods for postoperative pain management following cardiac surgery requiring median sternotomy: intermittent programmed LA bolus versus continuous LA infusion through ESP catheters. Effectiveness of analgesia will be assessed based on the subjects' NRS pain scores and opioid consumption. The primary outcome measure will be the patients' opioid consumption over the course of the 72 hours following surgery. Secondary outcomes measures that will be evaluated include NRS pain scores, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and time to first dose of antiemetic in the postoperative period. It is hypothesized that the use of intermittent programmed LA boluses will provide better analgesia compared to continuous LA infusion through ESP catheters. The findings of this study will provide guidance regarding the optimal method of delivery for postoperative pain management in patients following cardiac surgery.

Interventions

DRUGContinuous Infusion of ropivacaine

Continuous infusion of ropivacaine

DRUGIntermittent bolus of ropivacaine

Intermittent bolus of ropivacaine

Sponsors

Henry Ford Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER
Avanos Medical
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The only people who will know the treatment arm that has been assigned to the participant are the research coordinator who randomized them and the regional anesthesia team. The patient, nursing team, and research coordinator performing outcomes assessments will all be blinded to the treatment group.

Intervention model description

Patients will be randomized to one of two treatment groups (one with continuous infusion of drug and the other with bolus via ESP catheter)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Non-emergent elective cardiac surgery requiring median sternotomy for surgical exposure (i.e. CABG, aortic/mitral/tricuspid valve replacements) receiving ESP catheter preoperatively * Age 18-90

Exclusion criteria

* Placement and/or existence of cardiac assist devices (LVAD, RVAD, Balloon Pump, Impella) * Neurocognitive dysfunction * Patients who expire before extubation * Non-English speaking * Daily opioid therapy prior to surgery * History of substance abuse * BMI \> 45

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opioid Consumption POD 10-24 hours post-opOpioid consumption (MME) over the course of the first 24 hours following surgery
Opioid Consumption POD 224-48 hours post-opOpioid consumption (MME) over the course of the 48 hours following surgery
Opioid Consumption POD 348-72 hours post-opOpioid consumption (MME) over the course of the 48-72 hours following surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NRS Pain Score POD 10-24 hrs post-opNumeric rating scale score for pain (rated 0=no pain through 10= worst imaginable pain) in the first 24 hours post-op
NRS Pain Score POD 224-48 hrs post-opNumeric rating scale score for pain (rated 0=no pain through 10= worst imaginable pain) on POD 2
NRS Pain Score POD 348-72 hrs post-opNumeric rating scale score for pain (rated 0=no pain through 10= worst imaginable pain) during 48-72 hours post-op
ICU Length of Stay7 days post-opTime from post-op to step-down from ICU
Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR-15) Score POD 10-24 hours post-opQuality of Recovery 15 (QoR-15) score: 15 question survey (0=very poor recovery through 150=excellent recovery) during POD 1.
Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR-15) Score POD 224-48 hours post-opQuality of Recovery 15 (QoR-15) score: 15 question survey (0=very poor recovery through 150=excellent recovery) during POD 2.
Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR-15) Score POD 348-72 hours post-opQuality of Recovery 15 (QoR-15) score: 15 question survey (0=very poor recovery through 150=excellent recovery) during POD 3.
Time to First Antiemetic0-200 hours post-opTime to first antiemetic post-op
Time to First Bowel Movement0-72 hours post-opTime to first bowel movement post-op

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from October 18th, 2022 through December 19th, 2024 from a large academic hospital in the midwestern United States.

Pre-assignment details

All subjects who consented to participate in the study were randomized to one of the two groups.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous64.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
Body Mass Index29.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
33 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
151 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
78 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 960 / 108
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 960 / 108
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 960 / 108

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 14, 2026