End Stage Kidney Disease
Conditions
Keywords
hemodialysis, ultrafiltration
Brief summary
Patients treated with hemodialysis (HD) bear increased risk of cardiovascular events, which results in high morbidity and mortality among this cohort of patients. Intradialytic hypotension (IDH), which is an independent risk factor for mortality, occurs in up to 20% of hemodialysis session and may lead to myocardial stunning and cerebral ischemia resulting in increased white matter lesions, gastrointestinal ischemia and shunt vessel thrombosis. Due to the deleterious effects of IDH during HD, preventive measurements such as limiting interdialytic weight gain are recommended, but frequently fluid and salt restriction are not adhered to, thus increasing dialysis time or frequency of treatments is a common strategy in those patients.
Detailed description
A KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) controversies conference suggested that isolated ultrafiltration (iso-UF) may provide a benefit in hemodynamic stability, but whether this translates into benefits in hard outcomes is unclear and requires further research. So called-sequential dialysis, that is, isolated ultrafiltration followed by HD is commonly recommended, but evidence is very limited and mainly based on small older studies. In conclusion, the supposed benefit for intradialytic hemodynamic stability attributed to isolated ultrafiltration compared to hemodialysis seems to be due to less pronounced changes in vascular resistance, but the reason for this discrepancy is unclear. Thus far, recommendations for using iso-UF to improve hemodynamic stability are mainly based on old studies which may not be applicable to modern technique used nowadays. Furthermore, there is no standardized approach on how to use isolated ultrafiltration, with neither a time period nor ultrafiltration rate recommended by the guidelines. In this study, the investigators try to assess changes in peripheral resistance, osmolality, cardiac output, and cardiac power index and try to establish exploratory correlations to IDH episodes. Furthermore, the investigators want to assess the impact on dialysis quality by reduced time on dialysis.
Interventions
PROCEDUREisolated Ultrafiltration (iso-UF)
isolated Ultrafiltration
Sponsors
Medical University of Graz
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Written consent of the participant after being informed * At least 18 years of age * End stage kidney disease patient undergoing hemodialysis * Dry weight stable for a minimum of one month * Interdialytic weight gain of \>2 liters in the short interdialytic interval
Exclusion criteria
* No informed consent was obtained * Patients with a pacemaker or implanted medical device that prevents compliance with study regulations * Patients treated with hemodiafiltration * Patients treated with medium cut-off membranes (Theranova, Baxter) * Patients with recurrent severe hyperkalemia after the short interdialytic interval (K+ concentration \> 6.0 mmol/L, requiring more than 2 hours of dialysis to ameliorate the post-dialytic shift from other compartments. * Women of childbearing age not using contraception
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Total peripheral resistance index (TPRI) | up to 8 weeks | Absolute change of TPRI (expressed as dyn\*sec/cm\*m2) in each individual session from baseline to the nadir. |
Countries
Austria
Contacts
Primary ContactAlexander H Kirsch
Outcome results
None listed