Gastric Bypass, Gastric Outlet Obstruction, Hypoglycemia, Parenteral Support, Steatohepatitis
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary objective of this open-label pilot study is to investigate whether an endoscopically placed lumen apposing metal stent is an effective alternative to surgery in patients that have a clear indication for reversal of their gastric bypass.
Interventions
DEVICEThe Hot AXIOS™ Stent and Electrocautery-Enhanced Delivery System
EUS-guided gastro-gastrostomy using the Hot Axios device: Using a therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound endoscope with a working channel of 3.7mm and under fluoroscopic control, the excluded stomach will be identified and punctured with a 19G needle. Contrast injection will confirm the good position of the needle in the excluded stomach. If needed, the excluded stomach will be filled with blue-stained aqua (5% indigocarmine) until a sufficient distension is obtained for placement of the lumen-apposing metal stent. A lumen-apposing metal stent with a diameter of 20mm will be used according to the manufacterers' instructions to create a gastrogastrostomy. Position will be checked with fluoroscopy.
Sponsors
University Hospital, Ghent
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Placement of a 20mm lumen-apposing metal stent (Hot AxiosR, Boston Scientific) between the gastric pouch or the jejunum and the excluded stomach. The procedure will be performed by a physician with sufficient experience in the technique (more than 30 lumen-apposing metal stent placements of which more than 5 gastro-gastrostomies, the latter being the procedure that will be performed for the study). The proximal flange of the LAMS is preferably placed in the blind jejunal loop or, if this is not feasible, at least as far as possible from the gastro-oesophageal junction.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Group 1) patients needing any kind of parenteral nutritional support (eg. hypo- albuminemia, hypovitaminoses, mineral deficiencies,...) that can not be corrected by dietary intervention/oral supplementation * Group 2) patients with persistent invalidating symptomatic dumping syndrome despite optimal dietary intervention (typical complaints are headache, sweating, trembling, weakness and feeling hungry). * Group 3) patients with a refractory marginal ulcers with stenosis of the gastrojejunostomy leading to feading difficulties. * Group 4) patients with F3 or F4 liver fibrosis and a tendency to decompensation after bypass surgery, as demonstrated by an increase in serum bilirubin/INR and/or lowering of serum albumin.
Exclusion criteria
1. Uncorrectable coagulopathy 2. Presence of significant portal hypertension as demonstrated by 2.1) the presence of esophageal and/or gastric varices AND/OR 2.2) a hepatic venous pressure gradient (if measured) equal to or more than 10mm Hg AND/OR 2.3) the combination of 1. a platelet count \<150000/µl AND 2. liver stiffness measured by elastometry equal to or more than 20 kPa (Baveno guidelines). 3. Pregnant women, breastfeeding women or women that can not assure adequate anticonception for the duration of the study (based on anamnesis). 4. Karnofsky index less than 60 5. Vulnerable patients
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| clinical succes rate | 6 months | 1. for patients needing parenteral support: the number of parenteral supplements over a 6-month timeframe. 2. for patients with symptomatic hypoglycemia: resolution of hypoglycemia- associated complaints + negative hypoglycemia-provocative testing (oral glucose tolerance test and/or mixed meal test) at 6 months post-intervention. 3. for patients with gastric outlet obstruction: resolution of gastric outlet obstruction- associated symptoms at 6 months post-intervention. 4. for patients with steatohepatitis and signs of liver failure: improvement of liver function (significant drop in bilirubin/INR; increase in serum albumin) at 6 months post-intervention. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Technical success rate | 12 months | Correct placement of the lumen-apposing metal stent in the desired position, scored yes/no |
| Duration of the procedure | 12 months | time interval from scope introduction to successful deployment of the lumen-apposing metal stent. |
| Complication rate | 12 months | These include procedure-related complications such as bleeding, perforation, stent migration, peritonitis, reflux disease … Complications will be divided into early (within 24h) and late (after 24h but within 30 days) complications. The severity of each complication will be scored as followed: 1. mild: requiring admission or prolongation of planned admission \<3 days; 2. moderate: requiring prolongation of planned admission to 3-10 days; 3. severe: requiring prolongation of planned admission to more than 10 days or requiring surgery; 4. fatal: leading to death |
| Reintervention rate | 12 months | endoscopic and/or surgical, reason should be clearly mentioned: due to loss of stent patency, stent migration, side-effects,… |
Countries
Belgium
Contacts
Primary ContactPieter Hindryckx, Prof.
Outcome results
None listed