Skip to content

Treatment of Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection Comparing Single and Planned Double-Debridement Antibiotics and Implant Retention Followed by Chronic Antibiotic Suppression

Single vs Planned Double-Debridement Antibiotics and Implant Retention Followed by Chronic Antibiotic Suppression for the Treatment of Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05640336
Enrollment
490
Registered
2022-12-07
Start date
2023-03-03
Completion date
2032-03-31
Last updated
2025-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Keywords

Total knee arthroplasty, Total hip arthroplasty

Brief summary

The purpose of this research is to evaluate two different standard of care surgeries in treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Researchers are looking at differences in outcomes following single versus planned double debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for acutely infected total hip arthroplasty (THA), and total knee arthroplasties (TKAs).

Interventions

PROCEDURESingle Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention

Surgical debridement and wash out of infected joint. The polyethylene (plastic) insert, which acts as the articulating surface (modular component) of the prosthesis, will be removed and the exposed surfaces scrubbed, sterilized, and soaked. A new modular component will be placed with additional irrigation and antiseptic soak. Tissue cultures will be sent to the lab for further evaluation and antibiotic guidance. After the operation subjects will continue six weeks of IV antibiotics followed by oral antibiotic suppression for the life of the implant or at least two years after operation.

PROCEDUREPlanned Double Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention

Surgical debridement and wash out of infected joint with an additional irrigation and debridement scheduled for approximately 5 days after the initial DAIR. During the first washout, antibiotic cement beads will be placed in the joint and these will remain in the interim until they are removed during the second washout. During the second DAIR, the antibiotic beads are removed, and the modular components are once again removed and replaced with new components. Exposed surfaces are again irrigated and debrided following a standardized protocol. A six-week course of IV antibiotics will follow the DAIR with additional oral antibiotics for the life of the component (standard of care) or at least a minimum of two years.

Sponsors

Columbia University
CollaboratorOTHER
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who speak English and are willing to sign the consent form * Patients with acute early postoperative infection (symptoms ≤ 4 weeks from surgery; symptoms \< 4 weeks in duration) and acute hematogenous infection (greater than 4 weeks from surgery; symptoms \< 3 weeks in duration) of a primary total knee or total hip arthroplasty, defined as: * A sinus communicating with the prosthesis OR * Two positive cultures obtained from the prosthesis OR * 4 of 5 criteria: Elevated ESR (\> 30mm/hr) and CRP (\> 10mg/L); Elevated synovial leukocyte count (\>3000 cells/μL) or change of ++ on; leukocyte esterase strip; Elevated synovial neutrophil percentage (\> 80%); One positive culture; Positive histological analysis of periprosthetic tissue (\> 5 neutrophils per high; Power field in 5 high power fields x 400). * OR Patient with an acute infection diagnosed clinically by an orthopedic surgeon treated with DAIR

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a chronic PJI, defined as: presentation of symptoms \> 4 weeks in duration. * Revision surgery or previous two-stage reimplantation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjects free from failure1 year following DAIR.Total number of subjects considered failure free at one year from surgical DAIR procedure. Failure is defined as reoperation for infection within one year from surgical procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1-year surgical reoperation rate1 year following DAIR procedureTotal number of subjects to require reoperation or revision with or without infection within one year from the surgical DAIR procedure.
5-year surgical reoperation rate5 years following DAIR procedureTotal number of subjects to require reoperation or revision with or without infection within five years from the surgical DAIR procedure.
10-year surgical revision rate10 years following DAIR procedureTotal number of subjects to require reoperation or revision with or without infection within ten years from the surgical DAIR procedure.
Hospital length of stayApproximately 2 weeks following DAIR procedureTotal number of days subjects were admitted to the hospital
Readmission within 90 days of the surgical DAIR procedure90 days following DAIR procedureTotal number of subjects to required hospital readmission within 90 days of DAIR.
Clinical Outcome Scores1, 5, and 10 years following DAIR procedureEvaluation of patient reported Harris Hip or Knee Society Scores
Adverse events10 years following DAIR procedureTotal number of subjects to experience adverse events related to either drug or the surgical procedure
Survivorship10 years following DAIR procedureTotal number of subject deaths post-surgical DAIR procedure
Resource analysisApproximately 2 weeks following DAIR procedureHospital admission cost comparison between the two study arms

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026