Skip to content

Effectiveness of Video-assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Is Video-assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation More Effective Than Telephone-assisted or Not-instructed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by Laypeople? - a Randomized Controlled Simulation Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05639868
Enrollment
150
Registered
2022-12-06
Start date
2022-12-01
Completion date
2023-01-23
Last updated
2023-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest

Brief summary

Sudden cardiac arrest is a major public health problem worldwide and it is one of the leading causes of death in industrialized countries. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) dispatchers play an important role to recognize cardiac arrest and give help to the lay first responder via telephone CPR (T-CPR) which improves survival rates. The current technology allows the live video connection between the scene and the dispatcher which provides the opportunity for video-assisted CPR (V-CPR) via the bystander smartphone. Effectiveness of V-CPR has only been investigated to a limited extent. Comparing effectiveness of V-CPR (effectiveness of chest compression, time parameters eg. time to first chest compression) to T-CPR and non-instructed CPR can be useful to implement V-CPR technology.

Detailed description

Sudden cardiac arrest is a major public health problem worldwide and it is one of the leading causes of death in industrialized countries. EMS dispatchers play an important role to recognize cardiac arrest and give help to the lay first responder via telephone CPR (T-CPR) which improves survival rates. The current technology allows the live video connection between the scene and the dispatcher which provides the opportunity for video-assisted CPR (V-CPR) via the bystander smartphone. Effectiveness of V-CPR has only been investigated to a limited extent. Comparing effectiveness of V-CPR (quality of chest compressions: depth, rate, hand position), time parameters: time to recognize cardiac arrest, time of check breathing, total no-flow time, to first chest compression) to T-CPR and non-instructed CPR can be useful to implement V-CPR technology.

Interventions

Participants in V-CPR group get video-based (vocal and visual) instructions from the dispatcher.

Participants in T-CPR group get voice-based (vocal) instructions from the dispatcher.

Sponsors

University of Pecs
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthy volunteer

Exclusion criteria

* healthcare professionals (paramedics, nurses, etc.) * pregnant women * people with cardio-pulmonary and musculoskeletal diseases or any other impairment that would risk harm for the volunteer while performing CPR for 2 minutes * psychological disabilities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of chest compressions (depth of chest compressions).During procedureChest compression depth will be evaluated by a manikin connected to a CPR software.
Quality of chest compressions (rate of chest compressions).During procedureChest compression rate will be evaluated by a manikin connected to a CPR software.
Quality of chest compressions (hand position of chest compressions).During procedureHand position during chest compression will be evaluated by observation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time factors of CPRDuring procedureMeasuring the time of check breathing, time to recognize cardiac arrest, time to first chest compression, and cumulative time of no-flow time by the CPR software and observation.
Attitude of bystanders.Immediately after the CPR procedure (within 15 minutes)Subjective feelings after performing CPR based on a short survey using Likert-scale based queries (lower numbers indicate worse, higher score indicates better opinion).

Countries

Hungary

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026