Skip to content

Denosumab vs Zoledronate After Lumbar Fusion

Denosumab vs Zoledronate Efficacy in Osteopenic Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease After Lumbar Fusion Surgery

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05638399
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-12-06
Start date
2020-01-15
Completion date
2023-02-28
Last updated
2023-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Osteopenia

Brief summary

The aim of the study was to compare denosumab and zoledronate efficacy in bone mass, bone turnover markers (BTMs), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for leg and back, EuroQol Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) scores, Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis-31 (QUALEFFO-31) scores, and Roland-Morris Disability Functioning Questionnaire (RMDQ) scores, secondary fracture, complications and adverse events after lumbar fusion.

Detailed description

Lumbar degenerative disease including spinal stenosis and lumbar spondylolisthesis were the most common reason lead to older patients disability, which was the main indication for older patients to perform lumbar fusion surgery. For patients with lumbar degenerative disease older than 50 years old, a proportion of patients had osteoporosis. The trial aims to investigate whether denosumab versus zoledronate acid in osteopenic patients with lumbar fusion surgery.

Interventions

60 mg subcutaneously per 6 month

DRUGZoledronate

5mg, intravenous infusion once a year

Sponsors

Shenzhen People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants aged 40 to 85 years * who diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis or lumbar spondylolisthesis * osteopenia with BMD T score between -1 and -2.5 via dual energy X-ray * low back pain or leg numbness or weakness * MRI demonstrated signs of nerve compression * patients with one or two level symptoms.

Exclusion criteria

* cauda equina syndrome * progressive neurologic deficit * history of cancer * scoliosis greater than 15° * back open surgery history * have contraindications for surgery * who had anti-osteoporosis medication within 6 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analog scale (VAS) backup to 12 monthsThe VAS score for back pain were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 month. Use a ruler about 10cm long, one side is marked with 0 and the other 10 respectively. A score of 0 indicates no pain, 10 indicates the most unbearable pain.
Lumbar bone mineral density(BMD)up to 12 monthsLumbar vertebral (L1 to L4, except the surgery segment) BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months via dual energy X-ray
Total hip BMDup to 12 monthsTotal hip BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months via dual-energy X-ray
Femoral neck BMDup to 12 monthsFemoral neck BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 month via dual-energy X-ray
Procollagen type 1 n-terminal propeptide (P1NP)up to 12 monthsBone formation marker, P1NP were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months after surgery
C-terminal cross-linked type 1 collagen terminal peptide (CTX)up to 12 monthsBone resorption marker, CTX were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaireup to 12 monthThe Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is scored by 24 adding up the number of items checked yes on different low back pain-related daily activity disabilities. Total scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores 24 indicating a higher level of disability related to low back pain and lowest 0 represents no back pain.
The QUALEFFO-31 Questionnaireup to 12 monthThe Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis-31 (QUALEFFO-31), which contains three domains including pain, physical function, and mental function. This scale is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the highest QoL and 100 the lowest.
The EQ-5D Questionnaireup to 12 monthThe EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire evaluates health status consisting five dimensions: mobility, selfcare, performance of usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. After conversion, the index was between 0 and 1.0 (minimum score: 0, indicating worst health state; full score:1.0, indicating full health).
New fracture rateup to 12 monthNew fracture rate containing vertebral fracture and non-vertebral fracture was assessed at 12 month after surgery. The lowest score was 0, the highest score was 100%. The lower score 0 represents no secondary fracture.
Complicationsup to 12 monthComplications including cage subsidence, pedicle screw loosening, infection, peripheral nerve injury, and recurrent symptoms were assessed.
Adverse eventsup to 12 monthThe main adverse events including deep venous thrombosis, pneumonia, acute renal failure, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, influenza, transfer to intensive care unit, joint pain, headache, nausea, osteonecrosis of the jaw, atypical femoral fracture and rash.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactHongyu Wang, Doctor
wanghongyu790039663@126.com18241651300
Backup ContactSong Wang, Master
835990429@qq.com18085243269

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026