Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Conditions
Brief summary
Recent observational data showed a marked reduction of vascular and bleeding complications by the use of ultrasound(US)-guided femoral artery puncture to gain the vascular access and guide the implantation of the Perclose ProGlide® vascular closure system. We aimed to compare in a 1:1 randomized fashion the effect of US-guided femoral puncture and Perclose ProGlide® implantation optimization vs fluoroscopy-guided puncture followed by Perclose ProGlide/ ProStyle implantation (standard approach) during TAVR.
Detailed description
Transfemoral approach has become the standard route for a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure. Despite the technology improvements, vascular complications and access-related bleeding are frequently observed after TAVR and emerge predominantly within 30 days after TAVR. Recent observational data showed a marked reduction of vascular and bleeding complications by the use of ultrasound(US)- guided femoral artery puncture to gain the vascular access and guide the implantation of the Perclose ProGlide® vascular closure system. We aimed to compare in a 1:1 randomized fashion the effect of US-guided femoral puncture and Perclose ProGlide® implantation optimization vs fluoroscopy-guided puncture followed by Perclose ProGlide/ ProStyle implantation (standard approach) during TAVR.
Interventions
PROCEDUREUS-guided femoral puncture vs Fluoroscopy-guided puncture
US-guided femoral puncture and Perclose ProGlide®/Prostyle implantation compared to Fluoroscopy-guided puncture and Perclose ProGlide®/Prostyle in TAVR
Sponsors
Nicolaus Copernicus University
Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
1:1 randomized trial
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Eligible Patients are male or female with severe aortic stenosis evaluated by the Heart Team as candidate to TAVR based on the current cardiology guidelines.
Exclusion criteria
* Refusal to participate in the study; * Inability to provide written consent to the study protocol; * Chronic immuno-suppressant therapy; * Any concomitant condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would not allow safe participation in the study (e.g., drug addiction, alcohol abuse, emotional/psychological disorder); * Enrolment in another study that could confound the results of this study; * Life expectancy \< 1 year; * Any contraindication to TAVR procedure; * Non transfemoral TAVR.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Composite of CV mortality, vascular complications or access-related bleeding after TAVR at 30 days. | 1 month |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Vascular complications | 1 month | — |
| Life-threatening or disabling bleeding | 1 month | Fatal bleeding (BARC type 5) OR Bleeding in a critical organ, such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, or pericardial necessitating pericardiocentesis, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome (BARC type 3b and 3c) or Bleeding causing hypovolemic shock or severe hypotension requiring vasopressors or surgery (BARC type 3b) OR Overt source of bleeding with drop in haemoglobin ≥5 g/dl or whole blood or packed red blood cells (RBCs) transfusion ≥4 units (BARC type 3b) |
| CV mortality | 1 month | — |
| Major vascular complications | 1 month | Any aortic dissection, aortic rupture, annulus rupture, left ventricle perforation, or new apical aneurysm/pseudo-aneurysm OR Access site or access-related vascular injury (dissection, stenosis, perforation, rupture, arterio-venous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, haematoma, irreversible nerve injury, compartment syndrome, percutaneous closure device failure) leading to death, lifethreatening or major bleeding, visceral ischaemia, or neurological impairment OR Distal embolization (non-cerebral) from a vascular source requiring surgery or resulting in amputation or irreversible end-organ damage OR The use of unplanned endovascular or surgical intervention associated with death, major bleeding, visceral ischaemia or neurological impairment OR Any new ipsilateral lower extremity ischaemia documented by patient symptoms, physical exam, and/or decreased or absent blood flow on lower extremity angiogram OR Surgery for access siterelated nerve injury OR Permanent access site-related nerve injury |
| Minor vascular complications | 1 month | Access site or access-related vascular injury (dissection, stenosis, perforation, rupture, arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysms, haematomas, percutaneous closure device failure) not leading to death, life-threatening or major bleeding, visceral ischaemia, or neurological impairment OR Distal embolization treated with embolectomy and/or thrombectomy and not resulting in amputation or irreversible end-organ damage OR Any unplanned endovascularstenting or unplanned surgical intervention not meeting the criteria for a major vascular complication OR Vascular repair or the need for vascular repair (via surgery, ultrasound-guided compression, transcatheter embolization, or stent-graft) OR Percutaneous closure device failure of a closure device to achieve haemostasis at the arteriotomy site leading to alternative treatment (other than manual compression or adjunctive endovascular ballooning). |
| Major bleeding (BARC type 3a) | 1 month | Overt bleeding either associated with a drop in the haemoglobin level of at least 3.0 g/dl or requiring transfusion of two or three units of whole blood/RBC, or causing hospitalization or permanent injury, or requiring surgery AND Does not meet criteria of life-threatening or disabling bleeding |
Countries
Italy
Contacts
Primary ContactSergio Berti, MD
Backup ContactEliano Navarese, MD
Outcome results
None listed