Skip to content

Training Oculo-motor Control to Improve Vision When Using a Preferred Retinal Locus

Training Oculo-motor Control to Improve Vision When Using a Preferred Retinal Locus

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05637385
Enrollment
24
Registered
2022-12-05
Start date
2023-03-01
Completion date
2024-10-01
Last updated
2022-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Central Visual Impairment

Brief summary

When high-detail vision is lost due to a retinal disease such as macular degeneration, people see poorly, and have difficulty with eye movements (oculo-motor control). This preliminary study will investigate a potential behavioral intervention that may improve the ability to perform vision-related daily activities such as reading, recognising faces and watching television. The intervention involves many sessions that will train visual perception and eye movements over a period of a few months. Participants will have either lost central vision in both eyes or have normal vision (control group).

Detailed description

The purpose of the study is evaluate a potential treatment for loss of (foveal) central vision in both eyes which results in the use of a preferred retinal locus (PRL). The treatment is a series of 16 sessions of about one-hour duration that will involve a mixture of oculomotor control (OMC) training, perceptual training, and scotoma awareness. Two groups will receive the training: (1) central vision loss; and (2) normal sight who will use a simulated scotoma (called control group below). A single-site, two-way mixed factor, one within-subject and one between-subject, minimal-risk phase-2 study. Each participant with vision loss or in the control group will attend for three outcome-measurement visits and 16 training visits over a period of about two months (at 2 visits per week). Feasibility metrics will be obtained during recruitment and study conduct. PRL and OMC metrics will be obtained at every visit. Outcome metrics will be obtained before treatment, following 8 training sessions, and following 16 training sessions. Participants in the control group will experience a simulated central scotoma created by a gaze-contingent visual display system that simulates the loss of central vision by obscuring a region of central vision during testing and training. Participants will be trained using an integrated oculo-motor and perceptual training approach using a gaze-contingent visual display to provide scotoma awareness. Two tasks will alternate: (1) a textured search target that suddenly shifts, drifts smoothly, or is stable, requiring the subject to make a saccade, a smooth pursuit, or fixate, respectively, following which there is a same-different task to test attention; and (2) target following and visual search for (a) face within distractors, (b) object recognition and location, and (c) word recognition and object identification over cluttered background. During training, for the vision-loss group, the binocular scotoma (created by the retinal lesions) will be outlined using a gaze-contingent system, so that the subject will see a border at the edge of their binocular scotoma that moves with gaze, alerting them to the location of the scotoma. In addition to the 16 training sessions, there will be longer (2.5 to 3 hours) measurement sessions: (1) before training; (2) after 8 training sessions; and (3) after 16 training sessions. Due to the number of procedures, the first measurement session might consist of two sessions. Thus, each participant with vision loss will participate in 19 or 20 sessions in total. Ideally, participants will attend for two visits per week. However, the schedule is flexible and can be adapted to a participants schedule.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTraining of perception and oculo-motor control

Behavioral training of eye movements and perception

Sponsors

Research to Prevent Blindness / Lions Club International Foundation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Russell L. Woods
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Two-way mixed (one within, one between) factor study. Same training, applied to central vision loss group and normal vision control group viewing with simulated central scotomas.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Central Vision Loss Group Inclusion Criteria: * Bilateral foveal loss that includes the fovea in each eye, as determined through retinal examination * fluent in English * Cognitive function MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) test \>20 * Binocular visual acuity 20/800 or better * able to sit for at least an hour

Exclusion criteria

* speech impediment * history of neurological or psychiatric disease * inability to provide informed consent * inability to follow instructions in English Normal Vision Control Group Inclusion Criteria: * fluent in English * Cognitive function MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) test \>25 * Binocular visual acuity 20/40 or better * able to sit for at least an hour

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
video comprehension (shared word score) following sixteen training sessionscomparing shared word scores before intervention and after 16 sessions of trainingunderstanding and describing the content of short video clips
video comprehension (shared word score) following eight training sessionscomparing shared word scores before intervention and after 8 sessions of trainingunderstanding and describing the content of short video clips
face discrimination threshold following sixteen training sessionscomparing face discrimination thresholds before intervention and after 16 sessions of trainingrecognizing differences between faces
face discrimination threshold following eight training sessionscomparing face discrimination thresholds before intervention and after 8 sessions of trainingrecognizing differences between faces
reading speed following eight training sessionscomparing reading speed before intervention and after 8 sessions of trainingreading of paragraphs of text
reading speed following sixteen training sessionscomparing reading speed before intervention and after 16 sessions of trainingreading of paragraphs of text

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
letter contrast sensitivity following eight training sessionscomparing letter contrast sensitivity before intervention and after 8 sessions of trainingability to read large letters of low contrast
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) following eight training sessionscomparing GDS scores before intervention and after 8 sessions of trainingevaluate depression and aspects of quality of life
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) following sixteen training sessionscomparing GDS scores before intervention and after 16 sessions of trainingevaluate depression and aspects of quality of life
Veterans Affairs Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VA LV VFQ) following eight training sessionscomparing VA LV VFQ scores before intervention and after 8 sessions of trainingmeasure of visual ability and vision-related limitations
Veterans Affairs Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VA LV VFQ) following sixteen training sessionscomparing VA LV VFQ scores before intervention and after 16 sessions of trainingmeasure of visual ability and vision-related limitations
letter contrast sensitivity following sixteen training sessionscomparing letter contrast sensitivity before intervention and after 16 sessions of trainingability to read large letters of low contrast
PRL location relative to the location before the intervention (training)location at each of the 16 training sessions as compared to the location before interventionlocation of the preferred retinal locus measured from a retinal image obtained during a fixation examination
Oculo-motor reference location relative to the location before the intervention (training)at each of the 16 training sessions as compared to the location before interventionfirst landing location of saccades to a new location measured using a gaze tracking system; measures whether there has been an adjustment of eye movement planning
saccade dynamics relative to the location before the intervention (training)at each of the 16 training sessions as compared to the location before interventionslope of the saccadic main sequence, which is the speed to distance relationship of saccades (fast eye movements), as measured using a gaze tracking system
single-letter visual acuity following eight training sessionscomparing visual acuity before intervention and after 8 sessions of trainingability to read single letters of varying size
single-letter visual acuity following sixteen training sessionscomparing visual acuity before intervention and after 16 sessions of trainingability to read single letters of varying size

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
treatment fidelityduration of intervention periodadherence to the treatment session schedule, the adherence rate, any adherence pattern, and reasons for adherence failures
measurement fidelityduration of intervention periodability to obtain outcome measures (proportion of outcome measures completed, period and variance of improvement across subjects), obtain feedback on acceptability of outcome measures, and qualitative reasons for failure to complete specific outcome measures.
retention rateduration of intervention periodcompares the number of participants who complete the study to the number of participants who enrolled in the study; and obtain reasons for dropout
enrollment rateduration of enrollment periodcompares the number of participants who enroll in the study to the number of potential participants identified; and the time taken to enroll the study sample, and reasons for lack of willingness to participate (qualitative)

Contacts

Primary ContactZoe E Roth, BME
zroth@meei.harvard.edu617 912 2590

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026