Skip to content

FoodRx for Obesity Treatment

Food Supplementation Interventions to Improve Weight Loss for Adults With Food Insecurity and Obesity

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05635019
Enrollment
105
Registered
2022-12-02
Start date
2022-12-01
Completion date
2024-07-01
Last updated
2025-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Food Insecurity, Obesity

Keywords

obesity, food insecurity, weight loss

Brief summary

This study is a 3-group, parallel design, randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 105 adults with obesity and food insecurity that will compare BWL-Alone (including standard-of-care referral and connection with community food resources; n=35) to BWL plus food supplementation with either food vouchers (BWL+VOUCHER; n=35) or home-delivered, medically tailored groceries consistent with BWL recommendations (BWL+HOME; n=35). All groups will have BWL treatment provided for 24 weeks per clinical guidelines. Food vouchers and HOME will be provided for 24 weeks of treatment. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, and weeks 12 and 24.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBWL+VOUCHER

This group will receive the BWL program as well as food vouchers, in the form of grocery store gift cards. Participants will be allowed to select to receive gift cards to a grocery store or supermarket from a pre-determined list of stores. Gift cards worth $40 will be emailed or mailed to every 2 weeks after the BWL session.

BEHAVIORALBWL+HOME

This group will receive the BWL program as well as home-delivered boxes of groceries of low-energy density foods conducive to weight management guidelines. Groceries will include shelf-stable and perishable products like lean meats, fresh vegetables, and fruits. Every 2 weeks, participants assigned to this group will be allowed to select a choice of one of 4 boxes with slightly varied contents. Each box will have approximately $40 worth of groceries.

BEHAVIORALBehavioral weight loss counseling (BWL)

The behavioral weight loss program consists of 14 individual lifestyle counseling sessions provided over 24 weeks. Each session will be approximately 15-20 minutes. Visits will be scheduled weekly for the first 4 weeks (weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) and every-other week from weeks 6-24 (weeks 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24). The sessions will provide behavioral, dietary, and physical counseling.

Sponsors

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form 2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study 3. Age \>18 years 4. BMI \>30 kg/m2 at screening visit 5. Screening positive for food insecurity using a score of \>3 on the 10-item US Adult Food Security Survey Module109 6. Completion of baseline assessments 7. Ability to engage in physical activity (i.e., can walk at least 2 blocks) 8. Willing and able to provide pictures of food receipts to study team (or mail actual receipts) 9. Ability to reliably receive packages at a consistent location in a timely manner 10. Telephone or internet service to communicate with study staff 11. For females of reproductive potential: agreement to use of highly effective contraception for during study participation

Exclusion criteria

1. Serious medical conditions (e.g., type 1 or type 2 diabetes, renal failure) that may pose a risk to the participant during intervention, cause a change in weight, or limit ability to adhere to the program's behavioral recommendations 2. Significant psychiatric conditions (e.g., active substance abuse, schizophrenia) that may pose a risk to the participant during intervention, cause a change in weight, or limit ability to adhere to the program's behavioral recommendations 3. Breastfeeding, pregnant or planning pregnancy in the next 6 months 4. Planned move from the Philadelphia area in the next 6 months 5. Weight loss of \>5 kg in the previous 90 days 6. Recently began a course of or changed the dosage of medication that can cause significant weight change (±5 kg) 7. Previous or planned obesity treatment with surgery (excluding lap band if removed for \>1 year) or a weight-loss device 8. Use of prescription or over the counter medications for chronic weight management in the past 3 months 9. Household member already participating in study due to potential contamination effects 10. Lack of stable residence and ability to store and prepare food

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)Change from baseline to 24 weeksComparison of BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone in weight change (percent of initial weight) at 24 weeks. Positive numbers represent increases and negative numbers represent decreases.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
General Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)Change from baseline to 24 weeksChange from baseline to week 24 in general health-related quality of life (physical function component score) as assessed with the Short Form-36. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).
Weight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)Change from baseline to 24 weeksChange from baseline to week 24 in weight-related quality of life as assessed with the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).
Dietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)Change from baseline to 24 weeksChange from baseline to week 24 in skin carotenoid levels (skin carotenoids are measured on a scale from 0-800). Lower scores are worse and higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Dietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)Change from baseline to 24 weeksChange from baseline to week 24 in Healthy Eating Index scores as measured with the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).
Percent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+HOME vs BWL+VOUCHER)Change from baseline to 24 weeksComparison of BWL+HOME vs BWL+VOUCHER in weight loss (percent of initial weight) at 24 weeks. Negative values indicate losses. Positive values indicate gains.
Weight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)Change from baseline to 24 weeksChange from baseline to week 24 in weight-related quality of life (physical component scale) as assessed with the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).
Dietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)Change from baseline to 24 weeksChange from baseline to week 24 in skin carotenoid levels (skin carotenoids are measured on a scale from 0-800). Lower scores are worse and higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Dietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)Change from baseline to 24 weeksChange from baseline to week 24 in Healthy Eating Index scores as measured with the ASA24. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).
General Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)Change from baseline to 24 weeksChange from baseline to week 24 in general health-related quality of life as assessed with the Short Form-36. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Phone screen. Interested participants were consented verbally over the phone by study staff to participate in the initial telephone screening. Eligible participants attended a 1.5-hour, in-person screening visit.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) Alone
BWL counseling alone
35
BWL+VOUCHER
BWL counseling and gift cards to grocery stores
35
BWL+HOME
BWL counseling and home-delivered boxes of groceries
35
Total105

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBehavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) AloneTotalBWL+HOMEBWL+VOUCHER
Age, Continuous49.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
52.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
53.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
55.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
Baseline weight (kg)108.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9
107.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.2
110.4 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.1
104.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.8
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
23 Participants76 Participants26 Participants27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants23 Participants8 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants92 Participants31 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants13 Participants4 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 350 / 350 / 35
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 350 / 350 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 350 / 350 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)

Comparison of BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone in weight change (percent of initial weight) at 24 weeks. Positive numbers represent increases and negative numbers represent decreases.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) AlonePercent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)-2.7 Percent initial weight lossStandard Error 0.5
BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME)Percent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)-3.0 Percent initial weight lossStandard Error 0.3
Secondary

Dietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)

Change from baseline to week 24 in skin carotenoid levels (skin carotenoids are measured on a scale from 0-800). Lower scores are worse and higher scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks

Population: Intention-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) AloneDietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)15.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 10.3
BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME)Dietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)7.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.7
Secondary

Dietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)

Change from baseline to week 24 in skin carotenoid levels (skin carotenoids are measured on a scale from 0-800). Lower scores are worse and higher scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks

Population: Intention-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) AloneDietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)16.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.6
BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME)Dietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.5
Secondary

Dietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)

Change from baseline to week 24 in Healthy Eating Index scores as measured with the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).

Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) AloneDietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)0.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 3
BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME)Dietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)10.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.8
BWL+HOMEDietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone).8 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.8
Secondary

Dietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)

Change from baseline to week 24 in Healthy Eating Index scores as measured with the ASA24. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).

Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks

Population: Intention to treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) AloneDietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)10.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.8
BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME)Dietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME).8 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.8
Secondary

General Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)

Change from baseline to week 24 in general health-related quality of life (physical function component score) as assessed with the Short Form-36. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).

Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks

Population: Intention-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) AloneGeneral Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2
BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME)General Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)-0.64 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Secondary

General Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)

Change from baseline to week 24 in general health-related quality of life as assessed with the Short Form-36. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).

Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks

Population: Intention-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) AloneGeneral Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)0.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME)General Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Secondary

Percent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+HOME vs BWL+VOUCHER)

Comparison of BWL+HOME vs BWL+VOUCHER in weight loss (percent of initial weight) at 24 weeks. Negative values indicate losses. Positive values indicate gains.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) AlonePercent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+HOME vs BWL+VOUCHER)-3.5 Percent initial weight lossStandard Error 0.4
BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME)Percent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+HOME vs BWL+VOUCHER)-2.7 Percent initial weight lossStandard Error 0.5
Secondary

Weight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)

Change from baseline to week 24 in weight-related quality of life as assessed with the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).

Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks

Population: Intention-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) AloneWeight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)7.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.5
BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME)Weight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)8.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Secondary

Weight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)

Change from baseline to week 24 in weight-related quality of life (physical component scale) as assessed with the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).

Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks

Population: Intention-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) AloneWeight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)0.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME)Weight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026