Food Insecurity, Obesity
Conditions
Keywords
obesity, food insecurity, weight loss
Brief summary
This study is a 3-group, parallel design, randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 105 adults with obesity and food insecurity that will compare BWL-Alone (including standard-of-care referral and connection with community food resources; n=35) to BWL plus food supplementation with either food vouchers (BWL+VOUCHER; n=35) or home-delivered, medically tailored groceries consistent with BWL recommendations (BWL+HOME; n=35). All groups will have BWL treatment provided for 24 weeks per clinical guidelines. Food vouchers and HOME will be provided for 24 weeks of treatment. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, and weeks 12 and 24.
Interventions
This group will receive the BWL program as well as food vouchers, in the form of grocery store gift cards. Participants will be allowed to select to receive gift cards to a grocery store or supermarket from a pre-determined list of stores. Gift cards worth $40 will be emailed or mailed to every 2 weeks after the BWL session.
This group will receive the BWL program as well as home-delivered boxes of groceries of low-energy density foods conducive to weight management guidelines. Groceries will include shelf-stable and perishable products like lean meats, fresh vegetables, and fruits. Every 2 weeks, participants assigned to this group will be allowed to select a choice of one of 4 boxes with slightly varied contents. Each box will have approximately $40 worth of groceries.
The behavioral weight loss program consists of 14 individual lifestyle counseling sessions provided over 24 weeks. Each session will be approximately 15-20 minutes. Visits will be scheduled weekly for the first 4 weeks (weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4) and every-other week from weeks 6-24 (weeks 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24). The sessions will provide behavioral, dietary, and physical counseling.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Randomized clinical trial
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form 2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study 3. Age \>18 years 4. BMI \>30 kg/m2 at screening visit 5. Screening positive for food insecurity using a score of \>3 on the 10-item US Adult Food Security Survey Module109 6. Completion of baseline assessments 7. Ability to engage in physical activity (i.e., can walk at least 2 blocks) 8. Willing and able to provide pictures of food receipts to study team (or mail actual receipts) 9. Ability to reliably receive packages at a consistent location in a timely manner 10. Telephone or internet service to communicate with study staff 11. For females of reproductive potential: agreement to use of highly effective contraception for during study participation
Exclusion criteria
1. Serious medical conditions (e.g., type 1 or type 2 diabetes, renal failure) that may pose a risk to the participant during intervention, cause a change in weight, or limit ability to adhere to the program's behavioral recommendations 2. Significant psychiatric conditions (e.g., active substance abuse, schizophrenia) that may pose a risk to the participant during intervention, cause a change in weight, or limit ability to adhere to the program's behavioral recommendations 3. Breastfeeding, pregnant or planning pregnancy in the next 6 months 4. Planned move from the Philadelphia area in the next 6 months 5. Weight loss of \>5 kg in the previous 90 days 6. Recently began a course of or changed the dosage of medication that can cause significant weight change (±5 kg) 7. Previous or planned obesity treatment with surgery (excluding lap band if removed for \>1 year) or a weight-loss device 8. Use of prescription or over the counter medications for chronic weight management in the past 3 months 9. Household member already participating in study due to potential contamination effects 10. Lack of stable residence and ability to store and prepare food
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | Change from baseline to 24 weeks | Comparison of BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone in weight change (percent of initial weight) at 24 weeks. Positive numbers represent increases and negative numbers represent decreases. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| General Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | Change from baseline to 24 weeks | Change from baseline to week 24 in general health-related quality of life (physical function component score) as assessed with the Short Form-36. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best). |
| Weight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | Change from baseline to 24 weeks | Change from baseline to week 24 in weight-related quality of life as assessed with the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best). |
| Dietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | Change from baseline to 24 weeks | Change from baseline to week 24 in skin carotenoid levels (skin carotenoids are measured on a scale from 0-800). Lower scores are worse and higher scores indicate a better outcome. |
| Dietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | Change from baseline to 24 weeks | Change from baseline to week 24 in Healthy Eating Index scores as measured with the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best). |
| Percent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+HOME vs BWL+VOUCHER) | Change from baseline to 24 weeks | Comparison of BWL+HOME vs BWL+VOUCHER in weight loss (percent of initial weight) at 24 weeks. Negative values indicate losses. Positive values indicate gains. |
| Weight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME) | Change from baseline to 24 weeks | Change from baseline to week 24 in weight-related quality of life (physical component scale) as assessed with the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best). |
| Dietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME) | Change from baseline to 24 weeks | Change from baseline to week 24 in skin carotenoid levels (skin carotenoids are measured on a scale from 0-800). Lower scores are worse and higher scores indicate a better outcome. |
| Dietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME) | Change from baseline to 24 weeks | Change from baseline to week 24 in Healthy Eating Index scores as measured with the ASA24. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best). |
| General Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME) | Change from baseline to 24 weeks | Change from baseline to week 24 in general health-related quality of life as assessed with the Short Form-36. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Phone screen. Interested participants were consented verbally over the phone by study staff to participate in the initial telephone screening. Eligible participants attended a 1.5-hour, in-person screening visit.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) Alone BWL counseling alone | 35 |
| BWL+VOUCHER BWL counseling and gift cards to grocery stores | 35 |
| BWL+HOME BWL counseling and home-delivered boxes of groceries | 35 |
| Total | 105 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) Alone | Total | BWL+HOME | BWL+VOUCHER |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 49.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8 | 52.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 | 53.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 | 55.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 |
| Baseline weight (kg) | 108.0 kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9 | 107.7 kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.2 | 110.4 kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.1 | 104.6 kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.8 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 23 Participants | 76 Participants | 26 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 8 Participants | 23 Participants | 8 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 30 Participants | 92 Participants | 31 Participants | 31 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 5 Participants | 13 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 35 | 0 / 35 | 0 / 35 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 35 | 0 / 35 | 0 / 35 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 35 | 0 / 35 | 0 / 35 |
Outcome results
Percent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)
Comparison of BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone in weight change (percent of initial weight) at 24 weeks. Positive numbers represent increases and negative numbers represent decreases.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Population: Intention-to-treat analysis
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) Alone | Percent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | -2.7 Percent initial weight loss | Standard Error 0.5 |
| BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME) | Percent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | -3.0 Percent initial weight loss | Standard Error 0.3 |
Dietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)
Change from baseline to week 24 in skin carotenoid levels (skin carotenoids are measured on a scale from 0-800). Lower scores are worse and higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Population: Intention-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) Alone | Dietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | 15.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 10.3 |
| BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME) | Dietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | 7.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 6.7 |
Dietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)
Change from baseline to week 24 in skin carotenoid levels (skin carotenoids are measured on a scale from 0-800). Lower scores are worse and higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Population: Intention-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) Alone | Dietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME) | 16.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 8.6 |
| BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME) | Dietary Quality as Assessed by Skin Carotenoid Levels (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME) | -1.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 8.5 |
Dietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)
Change from baseline to week 24 in Healthy Eating Index scores as measured with the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).
Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) Alone | Dietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | 0.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 3 |
| BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME) | Dietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | 10.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.8 |
| BWL+HOME | Dietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | .8 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.8 |
Dietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)
Change from baseline to week 24 in Healthy Eating Index scores as measured with the ASA24. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).
Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Population: Intention to treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) Alone | Dietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME) | 10.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.8 |
| BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME) | Dietary Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME) | .8 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.8 |
General Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)
Change from baseline to week 24 in general health-related quality of life (physical function component score) as assessed with the Short Form-36. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).
Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Population: Intention-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) Alone | General Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | -0.5 score on a scale | Standard Error 2 |
| BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME) | General Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | -0.64 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.3 |
General Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)
Change from baseline to week 24 in general health-related quality of life as assessed with the Short Form-36. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).
Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Population: Intention-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) Alone | General Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME) | 0.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.8 |
| BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME) | General Health-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME) | -1.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.8 |
Percent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+HOME vs BWL+VOUCHER)
Comparison of BWL+HOME vs BWL+VOUCHER in weight loss (percent of initial weight) at 24 weeks. Negative values indicate losses. Positive values indicate gains.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) Alone | Percent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+HOME vs BWL+VOUCHER) | -3.5 Percent initial weight loss | Standard Error 0.4 |
| BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME) | Percent Change in Total Body Weight at 24 Weeks (BWL+HOME vs BWL+VOUCHER) | -2.7 Percent initial weight loss | Standard Error 0.5 |
Weight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone)
Change from baseline to week 24 in weight-related quality of life as assessed with the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).
Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Population: Intention-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) Alone | Weight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | 7.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.5 |
| BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME) | Weight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER and BWL+HOME vs BWL-Alone) | 8.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.6 |
Weight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME)
Change from baseline to week 24 in weight-related quality of life (physical component scale) as assessed with the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite. Scores range from 0 (worse) to 100 (best).
Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Population: Intention-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Weight Loss Counseling (BWL) Alone | Weight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME) | 0.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.8 |
| BWL+Supplement (BWL+VOUCHER or BWL+HOME) | Weight-related Quality of Life (BWL+VOUCHER vs BWL+HOME) | -1.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.8 |