Skip to content

Whole Blood in Trauma Patients With Hemorrhagic Shock

Whole Blood vs. Blood Components Therapy in the Hemostatic Resuscitation of Severe Trauma Patients: An Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05634109
Acronym
WEBSTER
Enrollment
220
Registered
2022-12-01
Start date
2023-01-14
Completion date
2026-03-31
Last updated
2025-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Trauma, Trauma Injury, Trauma, Multiple

Keywords

whole blood, Blood Transfusion, Blood Component Transfusion, Hemorrhage, Advanced Trauma Life Support Care, Hemostatic resuscitation

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate among trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock the clinical impact of hemostatic resuscitation between whole blood vs. blood components therapy in the following outcomes in a hierarchical analysis: mortality at 28 days and evolution of organ dysfunction.

Detailed description

Background: Hemostatic resuscitation is a mainstay in the management of trauma patients. Factors such as blood loss and tissue injury contribute to coagulation and hemodynamic status imbalances. Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of death in trauma patients, despite advances in strategies such as damage control surgery, massive transfusion protocol, and intensive care. Conventional therapy for hemostatic resuscitation is a blood transfusion seeking a 1:1:1 ratio of red blood cells, plasma, and platelets. However, this ratio has disadvantages in clinical practice, especially in low-resource settings. Whole blood transfusion can contribute to maintaining a physiological rate of cells, clotting factors, and hemostatic properties. Advances in the whole blood elucidated a new opportunity for its implementation in civilian trauma centers. However, the effect of initial resuscitation with whole blood in trauma patients is unclear. This study aims to determine the effect of hemostatic resuscitation using whole blood on mortality and evolution of organ dysfunction in severe trauma patients compared to blood components therapy. This clinical trial attempts to resolve the debate and uncertainty of using whole blood vs. blood components. Study Design: An open-label, randomized, prospective, single-center and controlled trial will be performed. This study will be included prospectively randomized severe trauma patients who require a blood transfusion. Randomization can assign participants to the experimental arm, transfusing them with 3 units of whole blood. If the participant continues requiring transfusions, the second intervention of 3 units of whole blood can be administered. On the contrary, the randomization can assign to the control arm, where the participant will receive 3 red blood cell units, 3 fresh frozen plasma units, and half of a platelets apheresis, equivalent to 3 platelets units. If required, a second intervention with the same ratio can be transfused to participants. The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite outcome based on mortality at 28 days and the evolution of organ dysfunction. Organ dysfunction will be measured as the difference in the score between the fifth and first days of the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment). Secondary outcomes are mortality, coagulopathy profile, intensive care unit free days, length of hospital stay free days, and volumes of transfusion requirements. Safety outcomes are complications related to transfusion (anaphylaxis, acute hemolytic reaction, acute lung injury) and complications related to trauma patients (acute distress respiratory syndrome, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury with or without dialysis, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, sepsis, abdominal complications, abdominal compartment syndrome)

Interventions

The intervention will be either a) administration of 6 units of whole blood or b) administration of blood component therapy in the proportion of 6:6:6 units of red blood cells, plasma, and platelets.

Sponsors

University of Pittsburgh
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario del Valle Evaristo Garcia
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Single center, Controlled, Randomized, and Open label therapeutic trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients (\> 18 years) * Activating institutional trauma code for trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock. * Candidate for massive transfusion (Patient with an Assessment Blood Consumption (ABC) Score ≥ 2 or at the discretion of the treating physician) * Concurrent availability of whole blood or blood component therapy

Exclusion criteria

* More than 4 hours from trauma to hospital admission * More than 2 hours from hospital admission to randomization * Transfusion of more than one packed red blood cell unit prior to randomization. * Patients who have undergone surgery (laparotomy, thoracotomy, or sternotomy) before hospital admission. * In-extremis patients with devastating injuries (expected to die within 60 minutes). * Blood group other than to O or A and positive Rh factor * Severe traumatic brain injury in which neurosurgical intervention is futile (partial decapitation, massive intracranial hemorrhage, or transcranial gunshot wounds). * Burns over 20% of the total body surface area. * Suspected airway burn. * Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) before arrival at the ED. * CPR for more than 5 minutes before randomization. * Do not resuscitate order. * Incarcerated/prisoners. * Known pregnancy in the ED. * Patient or legal representative who refuse to participate in clinical research studies.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The primary outcome is a hierarchical outcome consisting of mortality at 28 days post-randomization and evolution of organ dysfunction (difference of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score between day 1 and day 5 post-randomization).28 days post ED admissionThe primary outcome is a hierarchical composite outcome that will be analyzed using the Win-Ratio test. The first level will be 28-day mortality. The winner will be the participant who survival; in case of a tie, the second level will be the difference in SOFA score between fifth and first day. The winner will be participant with the lowest difference.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In-hospital mortality28 days post ED admissionThe occurrence of deaths during the hospital stays post-ED admission, and we will document and record the time of death in days.
Multiple organ dysfunction incidence1-day / 3-day / 5-day / 7-day post-ED admissionMultiple organ dysfunction is a score ≥ 3 in two or more systems evaluated by SOFA score.
Evolution of CoagulopathyAdmission - 3 hours - 6 hours - 24 hours post-ED admissionWe will evaluate the values of INR, fibrinogen, and MA-TEG during the admission and the first 24 hours post-ED admission.
Intensive care unit-free days28-days post-ED admissionICU-free days
24-hour mortalityFirst 24 hours post ED admission.The occurrence of deaths in the first 24 hours post-ED admission and we will document and record the time of death in hours.
Blood transfusion requirements during the first 24 hoursTime frame 3 hours / 6 hours / 12 hours / 24 hoursThe number of units of whole blood or blood components transfused. Comparisons will be according to the following references: * 1 Unit of Whole blood = 1 Unit of packed red blood cells. * 1 Unit of Whole Blood = 1 Unit of Plasma * 1 Unit of Whole Blood = 1 Unit of Platelets
Proportion of participants with transfusional adverse reactions28-days post-ED admissionWe will document transfusional adverse reactions such as acute hemolytic reaction, anaphylaxis, non-hemolytic febrile transfusion reaction, allergy, and potassium and calcium electrolyte disorders.
Proportion of participants with adverse reactions28-days post-ED admissionWe will document adverse reactions such as acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury with or without dialysis, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, sepsis, abdominal complications, and abdominal compartment syndrome
Hospital length stay-free days28-days post-ED admissionHospital length stay-free days

Countries

Colombia

Contacts

Primary ContactAlberto F Garcia, MD MSc
alberto.garcia@fvl.org.co+576023319090

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026