Skip to content

A Clinical Performance of Two Soft Toric Contact Lenses

A Clinical Performance of Two Soft Toric Contact Lenses

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05633082
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-12-01
Start date
2022-09-21
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2023-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Astigmatism

Brief summary

The study objective was to gather short-term clinical performance data for two soft toric contact lenses.

Detailed description

This participant-masked, non-randomized, controlled non-dispensing study was to compare the performance of two soft toric lenses. Participants attended one study visit which lasted for approximately 1.5 hours.

Interventions

DEVICELens 1 (omafilcon B)

Toric daily wear contact lens for 15 minutes

DEVICELens 2 (fanfilcon A)

Toric daily wear contact lens for 15 minutes

Sponsors

CooperVision, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

All participants received Lens 1 and then Lens 2 in fixed-sequence order.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* They are of legal age (18) and capacity to volunteer. * They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent. * They are willing and able to follow the protocol. * They currently wear soft contact lenses, or have done so within the past two years. * They have ocular astigmatism in both eyes of between 0.75DC and 3.00DC. * They are expected to be able to be fitted with the study lenses within the power range available.

Exclusion criteria

* They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. * They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. * They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment. * They are aphakic. * They have had corneal refractive surgery. * They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus. * They are pregnant or lactating. * They have an eye or health condition including an immunosuppressive or infectious disease which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction. * They have taken part in any contact lens or care system clinical research within two weeks prior to starting this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Overall Score15 minutesThe subjective overall impression of the contact lens (scored as a single value per participant) was assessed using a 0-100 visual analogue scale where 0=Extremely poor, 100=Excellent.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Comfort15 minutesSubjective comfort (scored as a single value per participant) was assessed using a 0-100 visual analogue scale where 0=Causes pain,100=Excellent.
Subjective Vision15 minutesSubjective vision (scored as a single value per participant) was assessed using a 0-100 visual analogue scale where 0=Unacceptable,100=Excellent.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Includes all study participants.
40
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Continuous40.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 400 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 400 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 400 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Subjective Overall Score

The subjective overall impression of the contact lens (scored as a single value per participant) was assessed using a 0-100 visual analogue scale where 0=Extremely poor, 100=Excellent.

Time frame: 15 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lens 1Subjective Overall Score71.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.2
Lens 2Subjective Overall Score78.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.2
Secondary

Subjective Comfort

Subjective comfort (scored as a single value per participant) was assessed using a 0-100 visual analogue scale where 0=Causes pain,100=Excellent.

Time frame: 15 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lens 1Subjective Comfort74.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
Lens 2Subjective Comfort85.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Secondary

Subjective Vision

Subjective vision (scored as a single value per participant) was assessed using a 0-100 visual analogue scale where 0=Unacceptable,100=Excellent.

Time frame: 15 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lens 1Subjective Vision76.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Lens 2Subjective Vision78.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026