Skip to content

COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES OF BI-FLANGED METAL STENT ALONE VERSUS BI-FLANGED METAL STENT WITH CO-AXIAL PLASTIC STENT FOR DRAINAGE OF WALLED-OFF PANCREATIC NECROSIS - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED STUDY.

COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES OF BI-FLANGED METAL STENT ALONE VERSUS BI-FLANGED METAL STENT WITH CO-AXIAL PLASTIC STENT FOR DRAINAGE OF WALLED-OFF PANCREATIC NECROSIS

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05632900
Acronym
BFMSP
Enrollment
76
Registered
2022-12-01
Start date
2021-07-17
Completion date
2022-12-20
Last updated
2023-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY

Brief summary

Endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage of WON with metal stent is the mainstay of WON management. But there are few complications related to BFMS , like bleeding due to vessel erosion, stent clogging , stent migration . This study is to assess, whether placing an anchoring DPS through the BFMS will decrease adverse events or not. There are only 2 retrospective studies till date ,comparing LAMS with coaxial stent vs LAMS alone. one study showed no significant decrease in adverse events , one study showed decrease in adverse events when DPS with LAMS . But there has been no prospective RCT to assess the utility of DPS to date

Detailed description

Inclusion Criteria: - 1. Symptomatic Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) 2. Eligible for EUS guided BFMS placement 3. Signed informed consent . 4. Age \>18 Years Exclusion Criteria: - 1. Types of pancreatic collections other than WON . 2. Drainage with stents other than BFMS 3. Previous attempts at drainage of WON 4. Coagulopathy (INR\>1.5) or thrombocytopenia(plc \<50000/cmm)- not correctable. 5. Pregnancy 6. Not willing to give informed consent

Interventions

PROCEDUREEndoscopic ultrasound guided drainage of walled off pancreatic necrosis

It is Therapeutic procedure to treat walled off pancreatic necrosis.

Sponsors

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Symptomatic Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) 2. Eligible for EUS guided BFMS placement 3. Signed informed consent . 4. Age \>18 Years

Exclusion criteria

1. Types of pancreatic collections other than WON . 2. Drainage with stents other than BFMS 3. Previous attempts at drainage of WON 4. Coagulopathy (INR\>1.5) or thrombocytopenia(plc \<50000/cmm)- not correctable. 5. Pregnancy 6. Not willing to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse evens rates associated with both the groups ( stent clogging and stent migration, bleeding).4 weeksTo monitor the adverse events like bleeding, stent clogging and stent migration.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
re-intervention rates4 weeksNumber of sessions of Direct Endoscopic necrosectomy and De clogging of stent
Technical success rate4 weeksDeployment of Stent
Clinical success rate4 weeksResolution of symptoms Resolution of size of walled of necrosis

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026