Skip to content

HOST - DAPT Duration According the Bleeding Risk

Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Diseases - DAPT Duration According the Bleeding Risk

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05631769
Acronym
HOST-BR
Enrollment
4900
Registered
2022-11-30
Start date
2020-07-24
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Artery Disease, Stable Angina

Keywords

percutenous coronary intervention, dual antiplatelet therapy, bleeding risk

Brief summary

* Dual antiplatelet agent therapy (DAPT) is essential in treating PCI patients. DAPT can minimize thrombotic adverse events that occur not only at the stented lesion, but along the whole coronary tree. However, DAPT has a critical side effect of increasing bleeding complications. Addressing the clinical imperatives of lowering bleeding while preserving ischemic benefit requires therapeutic strategies that decouple thrombotic from hemorrhagic risk. * Recently, the ARC definition of high bleeding risk (HBR) has been published, so as to stress the need of optimal DAPT treatment in HBR patients. Due to the definitely higher bleeding risk in HBR patients, it would be rather more straight forward to titrate the optimal DAPT duration in these patients. In this line, many studies are in progress on HBR patients, with an ultra-short DAPT duration (i.e. Leaders free, Onyx ONE, Master DAPT, Xience 28, Xience 90, Evolve short DAPT trial, etc.). * As a counteract to the definition of HBR, there is a concept of LBR. Due to the relatively vague ischemic/bleeding risk in LBR patients, balancing ischemic and bleeding complications post-PCI is more difficult in LBR patients, which may be a more important dilemma for clinicians. In this regards, limited evidence exists on the optimal duration of DAPT in LBR patients. Various previous studies that have evaluated the optimal DAPT in PCI populations, did not have the concept of HBR or LBR, making interpretation difficult. * Therefore, this study is planning to compare the efficacy and safety of different DAPT durations, in patients stratified according to the ARB-HBR definition.

Interventions

DRUGDual antiplatelet agent duration

Patients who receive percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease will be randomized to arms with different DAPT strategies. The randomization will be stratified according to the High bleeding risk (defined according to the ARC-HBR criteria).

Sponsors

Hanyang University Seoul Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion Criteria: 1. The patient agrees to participate in this study by signing the informed consent form. Alternatively, a legally authorized patient representative may agree to the patient's participation in this study and sign the informed consent form. 2. The patient in whom the Bleeding Risk (according to the ARC-HBR classification) can be calculated. 3. The patient has a working diagnosis of coronary artery disease which has been treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. *

Exclusion criteria

1. Hypersensitivity to aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitors 2. Patients in whom coroanry artery disease has been decided to be medically managed without a coronary stent. 3. Positive pregnancy test or is known to be pregnant 4. Any other reason the investigator deems the subject to be unsuitable for the study (e.g., Any life-threatening condition with life expectancy less than 6months, etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Net Adverse Clinical Events1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionNACE; the composite of All-cause Death, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Stent thrombosis, Stroke, or Major Bleeding event
Any bleeding event1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionBleeding events, defined by the BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) or ISTH (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis) classification
Major-Adverse Cardiac or Cerebral Events1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionMACCE; the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Stent thrombosis, Ischemic Stroke

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cardiac death1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionDeath due to cardiac cause
Non-cardiac death1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionDeath due to non-cardiac cause
Cardiovascular death1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionDeath due to cardiovascular cause
Non-cardiovascular death1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionDeath due to non-cardiovascular cause
Any myocardial infarction1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionAny myocardial infarction event (Clinically irrelevant periprocedural myocardial infarction will NOT be added to analysis)
Target vessel related myocardial infarction1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionAny myocardial infarction related to the target vessel; according to the 'Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus'
Non-Target vessel related myocardial infarction1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionAny myocardial infarction NOT related to the target vessel; according to the 'Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus'
All-cause death1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionDeath due to any cause
Non-Target vessel revascularization1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionAny revascularization event NOT related to the target vessel; according to the 'Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus'
Target vessel revascularization1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionAny revascularization event related to the target vessel; according to the 'Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus'
Any stroke1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionAny cerebrovascular event
Any ischemic stroke1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionAny ischemic cerebrovascular event
Any hemorrhagic stroke1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionAny hemorrhagic cerebrovascular event
Major bleeding1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionMajor bleeding events, defined by the ISTH (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis) classification
Any revascularization1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionAny coronary revascularization event
Medication compliance1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionMedication compliance to the allocated DAPT regimen: A 'Pill count adherence' will be used to calculate medication compliance. This will be calculated by the following formula: '\[(quantity dispensed)-(quantity remaining)\] over (Prescribed number of tablets between dates of interview)'.
Coronary thrombotic event1-year after percutaneous coronary interventionMyocardial Infarction, Stent thrombosis

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026