Skip to content

Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells vs Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Diabetic Patients With Chronic Limb Ischemia

Comparison of the Therapeutic Potential of Autologous Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells Versus Allogenic Wharton Jelly-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Diabetic Patients With Chronic Limb-threatening Ischemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05631444
Enrollment
24
Registered
2022-11-30
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
2022-10-28
Last updated
2022-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Limb-threatening Ischemia, Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Bone marrow mononuclear cells, Mesenchymal stem cells

Brief summary

Patients in the severe stages of Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are prone to amputation and death, leading to poor quality of life and a great socioeconomic burden. There is an urgent need to develop an effective therapeutic strategy to treat this disease. In this context, autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (BM-MNC) and allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells derived from different sources have emerged as promising therapeutic approaches for this condition.

Detailed description

Comparison of the therapeutic potential of BM-MNC vs. allogeneic Wharton jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (allo-WJ-MSCs) in diabetic patients with CLTI. Twenty-four type 2 diabetic patients in the most severe stages of the CLTI (category 4 or 5 in Rutherford's classification and transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) below 30 mm Hg were enrolled and randomized to receive 15 injections of (i) BM-MNC (7.197x106 ± 2.984 x106 cells/mL each with 2% of autologous serum) (n=7), (ii) allo-WJ-MSCs (1.333 x106 cells/mL each with 5% of human serum albumin serum) (n=7) or (iii) placebo solution (1 mL saline solution with 2% of autologous serum) (n=10), which were administered into the periadventitial arteries. The follow-up visits were at months 1, 3, 6, and 12, to evaluate the following parameters: (i) Rutherford classification (0 to 6) (ii) TcPO2 (mmHg) (iii) Wound closure (area cm2) (iv) pain (visual analogue scale (0-10) (v) pain-free walking distance (m) (vi) revascularization and limb-survival proportion during follow-up (vii) the quality of life (EQ-5D questionnaire).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALCell-based therapy

One dose of auto-BM-MNC, one dose of allo-WJ-MSCs, or one dose of placebo solution (saline solution with 2% of autologous serum), were periadventitial arteries administration in CTLI patients.

Sponsors

Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander Clínica Carlos Ardila Lulle
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult male or female, 40 years of age or over (until 85 years old) * TcPO2 ≤ 30 mmHg. * Diagnosis of diabetes. * Patients with signs of critical ischemia such as (i) ulcer that does not heal, (ii) necrosis or loss of tissue, (iii) pain at rest, and (iv) intermittent claudication. * Basal Rutherford classification stage 3 to 5. * Non-revascularizable patients due to comorbidities and/or anatomy. * Patients that despite revascularization (vascular surgery), have adequate distal beds to perfuse the limb. * Ankle/brachial index less than 0.4. * Stenosis or occlusion of the infrapatellar arteries.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants that do not sign the informed consent. * Presence of osteomyelitis. * Hemodynamic instability (MAP\<65 mmHg or vasopressor requirement). * Any acute systemic infectious disease process. * Severe sepsis. * Uncontrolled coagulopathy. * Condition of cancer. * Use of immunosuppressive or cytotoxic drugs * Alterations of the bone marrow that do not allow the adequate extraction of the components to be used as: acute leukemia, chronic leukemia, marrow aplasia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and myelophthisis. * Contraindication of sedation for bone marrow aspirate. * Patients who have suffered in a period \< six months of myocardial infarction, disease cerebrovascular or coronary intervention. * Patients with liver failure indicated by serum transaminases (aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase), with values twice the normal limit. * Any acute or chronic contagious disease including hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV. * Any other comorbidity that the treating vascular surgeon considers as a contraindication to cell treatments.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety profile: (adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs)12 monthsAEs: (i) local toxicity, including signs of local inflammation (swelling, warmth, impairment of function), worsening of ulcer, new ulcer, or hematomas after auto-BM-MNC or allo-WJ-MSCs administration. (ii) systemic toxicity as fever, allergies. (iii) maximum grade toxicity for tissue.
Safety profile12 monthsSerious AEs: hospitalization, malignancy, amputation, persistent or significant disability, or death.
Efficacy profile: Rutherford's classification12 months0 to 6
TcPO212 monthsmmHg
Efficacy profile: Visual Analogue Scale pain12 months0 to10
Efficacy profile: Pain-free walking distance12 monthsmeters
Efficacy profile: Wound closure12 monthscm2
Efficacy profile: Revascularization12 monthsPercentage
Efficacy profile: Limb survival proportion12 monthsPercentage
Efficacy profile: Quality of life12 monthsEQ-5D questionnaire

Countries

Colombia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026