Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Effect of SAR443820 on Serum Neurofilament Levels in Male and Female Adult Participants With Multiple Sclerosis

A Phase 2 Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Effect of SAR443820 on Serum Neurofilament Levels in Participants With Multiple Sclerosis, Followed by an Open-label Long-term Extension Period

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05630547
Enrollment
174
Registered
2022-11-29
Start date
2022-12-19
Completion date
2024-11-21
Last updated
2025-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Brief summary

This was a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 2 parallel-arm study to assess the effect on serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL), safety and tolerability of oral SAR443820 compared to placebo in male and female participants aged 18 to 60 years with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) (relapsing or non-relapsing), or primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) followed by an open-label long-term extension period. The total study duration was approximately 100 weeks and included the following: 4-week screening period 48-week double-blind treatment period (Part A) 48-week open-label long-term extension period (Part B) The study was terminated prior to completion (of Week 96) as primary endpoint was not met. Therefore final duration was less than 96 weeks.

Detailed description

Approximately 100 weeks

Interventions

Tablet by oral administration

OTHERPlacebo

Tablet by oral administration

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double-blinded treatment (Part A) and open-label long-term extension period (Part B)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, 18 to 60 years (inclusive) of age, at the time of signing the informed consent. * Participants with diagnosis of RRMS, SPMS (relapsing or non-relapsing) or primary progressive subtype according to the 2017 revision of the McDonald diagnostic criteria (SPMS diagnostic criteria according to initial relapsing remitting disease course followed by progression with or without occasional relapses, minor remissions, and plateaus; progression denotes the continuous worsening of neurological impairment over at least 6 months). * Participants with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 2 to 6 inclusive at screening. * Participants who were either untreated or in the opinion of the Investigator were stable on an allowed disease-modifying therapy (DMT) (interferons, glatiramer acetate, fumarates, or teriflunomide) for at least the past 3 months, AND not anticipated to require a change in multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment for the duration of Part A and Part B (through Week 96); in Part B changes in dose of allowed DMTs or transition to other allowed DMTs was permitted). * Participants with body weight at least 45 kg and body mass index (BMI) at least 18.0 kg/m\^2. * Contraceptive use by men and women was consistent with local regulations regarding the methods of contraception for those participating in clinical studies.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with immunodeficiency syndromes or other autoimmune diseases requiring immunosuppressive therapy * Participants with a history of seizures or epilepsy (history of febrile seizure during childhood was allowed). * Participants with known clinical relapse (acute or subacute episodes of new or increasing neurological dysfunction followed by full or partial recovery, in absence of fever or infection) within 8 weeks of screening. * Participants with neurological disease history other than MS, eg, head trauma within 3 months, cerebrovascular disease, and vascular dementia. * Participants with a history of recent serious infection (eg, pneumonia, septicemia) within 4 weeks of screening; an infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals within 4 weeks of screening; or chronic bacterial infections (such as tuberculosis) deemed unacceptable, as per Investigator's judgment. * Participants who had significant cognitive impairment, psychiatric disease, other neurodegenerative disorders (eg, Parkinson disease or Alzheimer disease), substance abuse, or any other conditions that made the participants unsuitable for participating in the study or interfered with assessment or completing the study in the opinion of the Investigator. * Participants with a documented history of attempted suicide over the 24 weeks prior to the Screening Visit, presents with suicidal ideation of category 4 or 5 on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS), or if in the Investigator's judgment, the participant was at risk for a suicide attempt. * Participants with a history of unstable or severe cardiac, pulmonary, oncological, hepatic, or renal disease or another medically significant illness other than MS precluding their safe participation in this study. * Participants who received a live vaccine within 14 days before the Screening Visit. * Participants with a known history of allergy to any ingredients of SAR443820 (mannitol, lactose monohydrate, sodium starch glycolate, colloidal silicon dioxide, magnesium stearate, hypromellose, titanium dioxide, polyethylene glycol, and microcrystalline cellulose). * Participants who used any medications that are moderate or strong inhibitors or strong inducers of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). * Participants who used of any of the following medications/treatments: fampridine/dalfampridine, ofatumumab, fingolimod, cladribine, siponimod, ponesimod, ozanimod, alemtuzumab, mitoxantrone, ocrelizumab, natalizumab, or similar approved compounds but with different trade names and any unapproved treatments or therapies for MS; any DMTs newly approved after January 2023 that are marketed at any time during the course of the double-blind study period. These medications were not allowed within 5 half-lives before the Screening Visit and for the duration of Part A and Part B. * Participants who had prior/concurrent clinical study enrollment, ie, the participant had taken other investigational drugs within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever was longer, before the first Screening Visit; concurrent or recent participation in non-interventional studies may be permitted. Participants with abnormal laboratory test(s) at the Screening Visit: * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) more than 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN) * Bilirubin more than 1.5 x ULN; unless the participant has documented Gilbert syndrome (isolated bilirubin more than 1.5 x ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin less than 35%) * Serum albumin less than 3.5 g/dL * Estimated Glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease \[MDRD\]) * Other abnormal laboratory values or electrocardiogram (ECG) changes that are deemed clinically significant as per Investigator's judgment * The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a potential participation in a clinical trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part A: Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (sNfL) LevelsBaseline (up to Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48Serum blood samples were collected at indicated time points to measure changes in NfL, a marker of neuronal damage. Baseline was defined as the average value of the assessments on screening and Day 1 visits prior to the first dose of the study treatment unless the number of Gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing T1 lesion at Day 1 was greater than zero in which case baseline was the lower value of screening and Day 1 visits.
Part B: Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain LevelsBaseline (up to Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 72Serum blood samples were collected at indicated time points to measure changes in NfL, a marker of neuronal damage. Baseline was defined as the average value of the assessments on screening and Day 1 visits prior to the first dose of the study treatment unless the number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesion at Day 1 was greater than zero in which case baseline was the lower value of screening and Day 1 visits.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part A: Number of New, Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by MRIPost-baseline (Baseline: Day 1, pre-dose) and up to Week 48The adjusted number of new, enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions per year were derived using negative binomial model.
Part B: Number of New, Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by MRIFrom Week 48 to approximately up to Week 72Cumulative number of new, enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions detected by MRI, defined as the sum of the individual number of new, enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions at all scheduled visits at all scheduled visits calculated for each arm/group as a whole.
Part A: Time to Onset of 12 Weeks Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) From Baseline as Assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48Time to onset of 12 weeks CDP was defined as time from randomization to onset of an increase in EDSS score (defined as an increase of \>=1.0 point from baseline EDSS score when baseline score was \<=5.5 or an increase of \>=0.5 points from baseline EDSS score when baseline score was \>5.5) confirmed after a 12 weeks interval. EDSS was a scale for assessing neurologic impairment in participants with MS, based on 7 functional systems (FS) in brain which was used to derive score. The standard EDSS assessments of 7 FS (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder, and cerebral functions) scoring was performed by assessment of neurologic symptoms in each FS. Ambulation scoring was done to conclude evaluation. Individual FS scores were then used in conjugation with ambulation score to obtain EDSS score which ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), with higher scores indicating greater disability. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).
Part B: Time to Onset of 24 Weeks Confirmed Disability Progression From Baseline as Assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale ScoreBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72Time to onset of 24 weeks CDP was defined as time from randomization to onset of an increase in EDSS score (defined as an increase of \>=1.0 point from baseline EDSS score when baseline score was \<=5.5 or an increase of \>=0.5 points from baseline EDSS score when baseline score was \>5.5) confirmed after a 12 weeks interval. EDSS was a scale for assessing neurologic impairment in participants with MS, based on 7 FS in brain which was used to derive score. The standard EDSS assessments of 7 FS (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder, and cerebral functions) scoring was performed by assessment of neurologic symptoms in each FS. Ambulation scoring was done to conclude evaluation. Individual FS scores were then used in conjugation with ambulation score to obtain EDSS score which ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), with higher scores indicating greater disability. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).
Part A: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) Confirmed Over at Least 12 WeeksBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48The 9-HPT was a brief, standardized, quantitative test of upper extremity function (lower bound: 10 seconds; upper bound: 300 seconds). Two consecutive trials with the dominant hand were immediately followed by 2 consecutive trials with the non-dominant hand. The mean time to test completion served as an assessment of the participant's hand dexterity. A participant was asked to place pegs into holes and remove them with the dominant and non-dominant hand for several repetitions. A higher value of overall 9-HPT was indicative of higher disability. An increase of \>=20% from the baseline score in the 9-HPT was considered meaningful worsening. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).
Part B: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in 9-Hole Peg Test Confirmed Over at Least 24 WeeksBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72The 9-HPT was a brief, standardized, quantitative test of upper extremity function (lower bound: 10 seconds; upper bound: 300 seconds). Two consecutive trials with the dominant hand were immediately followed by 2 consecutive trials with the non-dominant hand. The mean time to test completion served as an assessment of the participant's hand dexterity. A participant was asked to place pegs into holes and remove them with the dominant and non-dominant hand for several repetitions. A higher value of overall 9-HPT was indicative of higher disability. An increase of \>20% from the baseline score in the 9-HPT was considered meaningful worsening. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).
Part A: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25-FW) Confirmed Over at Least 12 WeeksBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48The T25-FW test was used to assess a participant's walking ability, time in seconds to walk 25 feet (lower bound: 2.2 seconds; upper bound: 180 seconds). The participant was directed to 1 end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and was instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as safely possible with several repetitions. The mean walk time was used for assessment of the participant's walking ability. An increase of \>20% from the baseline score in the T25-FW test was considered as meaningful worsening. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).
Part B: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in Timed 25-Foot Walk Test Confirmed Over at Least 24 WeeksBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72The T25-FW test was used to assess a participant's walking ability, time in seconds to walk 25 feet (lower bound: 2.2 seconds; upper bound: 180 seconds). The participant was directed to one end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and was instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as safely possible with several repetitions. The mean walk time was used for assessment of the participant's walking ability. An increase of \>20% from the baseline score in the T25-FW test was considered as meaningful worsening. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).
Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale ScoreBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48 (Part A) and approximately up to Week 72 (Part B)EDSS was a scale for assessing neurologic impairment in participants with MS, based on 7 FS in the brain which was used to derive the EDSS (score). The standard EDSS assessments of 7 FS (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder, and cerebral functions) scoring was performed by assessment of neurologic symptoms in each FS. Ambulation scoring was done to conclude the evaluation. Individual FS scores were then used in conjugation with ambulation score to obtain EDSS score which ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), with higher scores indicating greater disability. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).
Part A: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) PopulationUp to Week 48Relapse was defined as the occurrence of acute, new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous neurological symptoms with an objective change on neurological examination attributable to MS. Symptoms were as follows: attributed to MS, last for \>=24 hours, present at normal body temperature, and preceded by \>=30 days of clinical stability (no previous MS relapse). The adjusted ARR was derived using negative binomial model with the total number of relapses per participant occurring in the observation period.
Part B: Annualized Relapse Rate of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis PopulationApproximately up to Week 72Relapse was defined as the occurrence of acute, new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous neurological symptoms with an objective change on neurological examination attributable to MS. Symptoms were as follows: attributed to MS, last for \>=24 hours, present at normal body temperature, and preceded by \>=30 days of clinical stability (no previous MS relapse). The unadjusted ARR was the total number of relapses that occurred during the observation period divided by the total participant years in the study.
Parts A and B: Percent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume Loss (BVL) as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance ImagingBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48 (Part A) and approximately up to Week 72 (Part B)The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate BVL. Imaging measure to detect degree of atrophy or decrease in whole brain, cortical and/or thalamic volume, which was diagnostic evidence of disease progression and played a key role in long-term disability. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).
Part A: Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Post-baseline (Baseline: Day 1, pre-dose) and up to Week 48The adjusted number of new Gd-enhancing T1 hyperintense lesions per scan were derived using negative binomial model.
Part B: Volume of Slowly Expanding LesionsApproximately up to Week 72The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate volume of SELs. SELs represent chronic active lesions in MS where there is ongoing, smoldering inflammation primarily driven by activated microglia and macrophages at the lesion edges. This localized, radial expansion causes gradual enlargement of pre-existing T2 MRI lesions over time and leads to progressive neural tissue damage including demyelination, axonal loss, and irreversible CNS injury.
Part A: Number of Slowly Expanding LesionsWeek 48The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate number of SELs. SELs represent chronic active lesions in MS where there is ongoing, smoldering inflammation primarily driven by activated microglia and macrophages at the lesion edges. This localized, radial expansion causes gradual enlargement of pre-existing T2 MRI lesions over time and leads to progressive neural tissue damage including demyelination, axonal loss, and irreversible CNS injury.
Part B: Number of Slowly Expanding LesionsApproximately up to Week 72The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate number of SELs. SELs represent chronic active lesions in MS where there is ongoing, smoldering inflammation primarily driven by activated microglia and macrophages at the lesion edges. This localized, radial expansion causes gradual enlargement of pre-existing T2 MRI lesions over time and leads to progressive neural tissue damage including demyelination, axonal loss, and irreversible CNS injury.
Part A: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose), Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate normalization of T1 intensity of SELs. It was used to quantify tissue damage within SELs of MS, reflecting neuro-axonal loss and demyelination and correlating with clinical progression.
Part B: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsWeek 48 and Week 72The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate normalized T1 intensity of SELs. It was used to quantify tissue damage within SELs of MS, reflecting neuro-axonal loss and demyelination and correlating with clinical progression.
Part A: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions (PRL) Conducted at 3 Tesla (3T) Capable SitesBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48The basic MRI scan sequences were performed at all sites and used to evaluate number of PRL. Phase rim lesions were a subtype of MS lesion identified by a paramagnetic edge indicative chronic smoldering inflammation linked to chronic active lesions. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).
Part B: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions Conducted at 3 Tesla Capable SitesBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72The basic MRI scan sequences were performed at all sites and used to evaluate number of PRL. Phase rim lesions were a subtype of MS lesion identified by a paramagnetic edge indicative chronic smoldering inflammation linked to chronic active lesions. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).
Parts B and A+B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) After SAR443820 InitiationFrom first dose of SAR443820 (Day 1, post-dose) up to 14 days after last dose of SAR443820 administration in Part B, approximately 93 weeks for Parts A+B combined arm (SAR443820/SAR443820), approximately 45 weeks Part B Arm (Placebo/SAR443820)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. TEAEs were defined as the AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period (defined as time from first administration of study treatment (Day 1) to last administration of study treatment + 14 days). SAE: Any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. All TEAE occurring after SAR443820 initiation are provided for both randomized treatment arms in this endpoint.
Part A: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820Day 1: 0.25-1 hour and 1-3 hours post-dose; Week 2: pre-dose, 0.5-3 hours post-dose; Weeks 6, 12, and 36: pre-dosePlasma samples were collected at specified timepoints to determine plasma concentrations of SAR443820.
Part B: Time to Onset of Composite Confirmed Disability Progression Confirmed Over at Least 24 WeeksBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72Time to onset of 24-week CCDP, was assessed by composite endpoint EDSS-Plus (EDSS score, or T25-FW test, or 9-HPT), was confirmed over at least 24 week. The EDSS-plus event was defined as disability progression on at least 1 of 3 components, EDSS score, or T25-FW test, or 9-HPT. Disability criteria for the individual components are defined as follows: Disability progression on the EDSS was defined as an increase of \>=1.0 point from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was \<=5.5 or an increase of \>=0.5 points from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was \>5.5. Disability progression on the T25-FW test was defined as an increase (worsening) of \>=20% from the baseline score. Disability progression on the 9-HPT was defined as an increase (worsening) of \>=20% from the baseline score. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).
Part B: Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 Version 2 (MSIS-29v2) Physical and Psychological Domains ScoresBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72The MSIS-29v2 evaluates the specific physical and psychological impact of MS from a participant's perspective. This participant reported outcome instrument has 2 subscales: a physical impact score (20 items) and a psychological impact score (9 items). The physical and psychological impact subscales of the MSIS-29v2 range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater physical or psychological impact. Each of the 2 scales are scored by summing the responses across items, then converting to score range 0-100 where 100 indicates greater impact of disease on daily function (worse health). Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).
Part B: Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale 12 Items (MSWS-12) ScoresBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72The MSWS-12 measured the impact of walking impairment in participants with MS. This participant reported outcome instrument has 12 items with a global score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better quality of life. The MSWS-12 score was calculated by summing the 12 components and transforming into a scale with a range of 0 to 100, with higher score indicating better quality of life. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).
Part A: Volume of Slowly Expanding Lesions (SELs)Week 48The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate volume of SELs. SELs represent chronic active lesions in MS where there is ongoing, smoldering inflammation primarily driven by activated microglia and macrophages at the lesion edges. This localized, radial expansion causes gradual enlargement of pre-existing T2 MRI lesions over time and leads to progressive neural tissue damage including demyelination, axonal loss, and irreversible central nervous system (CNS) injury.
Part B: Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by MRIFrom Week 48 to approximately up to Week 72Cumulative number of new Gd-enhancing T1 hyperintense lesions detected by MRI, defined as the sum of the individual number of new Gd-enhancing T1 hyperintense lesions at all scheduled visits calculated for each arm/group as a whole.

Countries

Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 34 centers in 10 countries. A total of 190 participants were screened between 19 December 2022 and 15 September 2023, of which 16 were screen failures. Screen failures were due to not meeting the eligibility criteria.

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of a screening period (4 weeks before randomization), treatment period (a 48-week double-blind in Part A, an 48-week open-label in Part B, with a maximum total study duration of 100 weeks. A total of 174 participants were randomized and 173 were treated in the study. The study was terminated as it did not meet its primary and key secondary endpoints, therefore Week 96 data was not collected.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part A: Placebo
Participants received placebo matching SAR443820 tablet orally QD for 48 weeks in Part A.
86
Part A: SAR443820
Participants received SAR443820 20 mg tablet orally QD for 48 weeks in Part A.
88
Total174

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Part A (Double-blind Period: 48 Weeks)Adverse Event11300
Part A (Double-blind Period: 48 Weeks)Lack of Efficacy0100
Part A (Double-blind Period: 48 Weeks)Other0200
Part A (Double-blind Period: 48 Weeks)Randomized and not treated0100
Part A (Double-blind Period: 48 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject8300
Part B (Open-label Period: 48 Weeks)Adverse Event0031
Part B (Open-label Period: 48 Weeks)Lack of Efficacy0011
Part B (Open-label Period: 48 Weeks)Non-compliance with study schedule0001
Part B (Open-label Period: 48 Weeks)Study terminated by sponsor007262
Part B (Open-label Period: 48 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject0013

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart A: SAR443820TotalPart A: Placebo
Age, Continuous48.22 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.21
47.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.88
47.27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.54
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants10 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
11 Participants20 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
74 Participants143 Participants69 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
53 Participants107 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
35 Participants67 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 860 / 870 / 770 / 68
other
Total, other adverse events
37 / 8643 / 8715 / 778 / 68
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 862 / 875 / 770 / 68

Outcome results

Primary

Part A: Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (sNfL) Levels

Serum blood samples were collected at indicated time points to measure changes in NfL, a marker of neuronal damage. Baseline was defined as the average value of the assessments on screening and Day 1 visits prior to the first dose of the study treatment unless the number of Gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing T1 lesion at Day 1 was greater than zero in which case baseline was the lower value of screening and Day 1 visits.

Time frame: Baseline (up to Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment and with an evaluable primary endpoint. Only participants with data collected at baseline and Week 48 are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (sNfL) LevelsBaseline9.622 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 5.316
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (sNfL) LevelsWeek 480.958 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 6.983
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (sNfL) LevelsBaseline10.319 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 7.402
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (sNfL) LevelsWeek 48-0.343 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 7.761
Comparison: Analysis was performed using mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) including the fixed categorical effects of the treatment group, multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical subtype (relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis \[RRMS\], secondary progressive multiple sclerosis \[SPMS\], or primary progressive multiple sclerosis \[PPMS\]), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, log-transformed baseline sNfL levels and log-transformed baseline sNfL levels-by-visit interaction.p-value: 0.804295% CI: [0.881, 1.103]MMRM
Primary

Part B: Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain Levels

Serum blood samples were collected at indicated time points to measure changes in NfL, a marker of neuronal damage. Baseline was defined as the average value of the assessments on screening and Day 1 visits prior to the first dose of the study treatment unless the number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesion at Day 1 was greater than zero in which case baseline was the lower value of screening and Day 1 visits.

Time frame: Baseline (up to Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 72

Population: The mITT population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment and with an evaluable primary endpoint. Only participants with data collected at baseline and Week 72 are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain LevelsBaseline9.622 pg/mLStandard Deviation 5.316
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain LevelsWeek 72-0.320 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3.433
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain LevelsBaseline10.319 pg/mLStandard Deviation 7.402
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain LevelsWeek 72-0.270 pg/mLStandard Deviation 5.247
Secondary

Part A: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) Population

Relapse was defined as the occurrence of acute, new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous neurological symptoms with an objective change on neurological examination attributable to MS. Symptoms were as follows: attributed to MS, last for \>=24 hours, present at normal body temperature, and preceded by \>=30 days of clinical stability (no previous MS relapse). The adjusted ARR was derived using negative binomial model with the total number of relapses per participant occurring in the observation period.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with RMS (RRMS plus relapsing SPMS) are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) PopulationNA relapses per participant-year
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) PopulationNA relapses per participant-year
Secondary

Part A: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions (PRL) Conducted at 3 Tesla (3T) Capable Sites

The basic MRI scan sequences were performed at all sites and used to evaluate number of PRL. Phase rim lesions were a subtype of MS lesion identified by a paramagnetic edge indicative chronic smoldering inflammation linked to chronic active lesions. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions (PRL) Conducted at 3 Tesla (3T) Capable SitesWeek 120.05 phase rim lesionsStandard Deviation 0.22
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions (PRL) Conducted at 3 Tesla (3T) Capable SitesWeek 240.11 phase rim lesionsStandard Deviation 0.65
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions (PRL) Conducted at 3 Tesla (3T) Capable SitesWeek 360.11 phase rim lesionsStandard Deviation 0.83
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions (PRL) Conducted at 3 Tesla (3T) Capable SitesWeek 480.14 phase rim lesionsStandard Deviation 1.02
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions (PRL) Conducted at 3 Tesla (3T) Capable SitesWeek 48-0.03 phase rim lesionsStandard Deviation 0.18
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions (PRL) Conducted at 3 Tesla (3T) Capable SitesWeek 120.00 phase rim lesionsStandard Deviation 0
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions (PRL) Conducted at 3 Tesla (3T) Capable SitesWeek 360.00 phase rim lesionsStandard Deviation 0
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions (PRL) Conducted at 3 Tesla (3T) Capable SitesWeek 240.00 phase rim lesionsStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Part A: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding Lesions

The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate normalization of T1 intensity of SELs. It was used to quantify tissue damage within SELs of MS, reflecting neuro-axonal loss and demyelination and correlating with clinical progression.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose), Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsWeek 12-0.066 ratioStandard Deviation 0.369
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsWeek 36-0.107 ratioStandard Deviation 0.355
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsWeek 24-0.096 ratioStandard Deviation 0.352
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsWeek 48-0.123 ratioStandard Deviation 0.357
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose)-0.055 ratioStandard Deviation 0.346
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsWeek 48-0.058 ratioStandard Deviation 0.37
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsBaseline (Day 1, pre-dose)0.008 ratioStandard Deviation 0.354
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsWeek 12-0.026 ratioStandard Deviation 0.325
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsWeek 24-0.031 ratioStandard Deviation 0.341
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsWeek 36-0.053 ratioStandard Deviation 0.35
Secondary

Part A: Number of New, Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by MRI

The adjusted number of new, enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions per year were derived using negative binomial model.

Time frame: Post-baseline (Baseline: Day 1, pre-dose) and up to Week 48

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Number of New, Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by MRI1.285 new and enlarging T2 lesions per year
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Number of New, Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by MRI2.532 new and enlarging T2 lesions per year
Secondary

Part A: Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

The adjusted number of new Gd-enhancing T1 hyperintense lesions per scan were derived using negative binomial model.

Time frame: Post-baseline (Baseline: Day 1, pre-dose) and up to Week 48

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)0.043 new Gd-enhancing T1 lesions per scan
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)0.155 new Gd-enhancing T1 lesions per scan
Secondary

Part A: Number of Slowly Expanding Lesions

The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate number of SELs. SELs represent chronic active lesions in MS where there is ongoing, smoldering inflammation primarily driven by activated microglia and macrophages at the lesion edges. This localized, radial expansion causes gradual enlargement of pre-existing T2 MRI lesions over time and leads to progressive neural tissue damage including demyelination, axonal loss, and irreversible CNS injury.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to the intervention allocated by randomization. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Number of Slowly Expanding Lesions1.507 number of SEL
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Number of Slowly Expanding Lesions1.534 number of SEL
Secondary

Part A: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820

Plasma samples were collected at specified timepoints to determine plasma concentrations of SAR443820.

Time frame: Day 1: 0.25-1 hour and 1-3 hours post-dose; Week 2: pre-dose, 0.5-3 hours post-dose; Weeks 6, 12, and 36: pre-dose

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population consisted of all randomized and treated participants with at least 1 post-baseline PK result with adequate documentation of dosing and sampling dates and times. Only participants who received SAR443820 with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820Day 1: 0.25-1 hours post-dose205.450 nanogram/mLStandard Deviation 134.734
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820Day 1: 1-3 hours post-dose237.232 nanogram/mLStandard Deviation 92.001
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820Week 2: pre-dose52.841 nanogram/mLStandard Deviation 54.432
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820Week 2: 0.5-3 hours post-dose289.312 nanogram/mLStandard Deviation 129.688
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820Week 6: pre-dose45.230 nanogram/mLStandard Deviation 41.458
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820Week 12: pre-dose49.039 nanogram/mLStandard Deviation 41.203
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820Week 36: pre-dose56.461 nanogram/mLStandard Deviation 60.18
Secondary

Part A: Time to Onset of 12 Weeks Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) From Baseline as Assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score

Time to onset of 12 weeks CDP was defined as time from randomization to onset of an increase in EDSS score (defined as an increase of \>=1.0 point from baseline EDSS score when baseline score was \<=5.5 or an increase of \>=0.5 points from baseline EDSS score when baseline score was \>5.5) confirmed after a 12 weeks interval. EDSS was a scale for assessing neurologic impairment in participants with MS, based on 7 functional systems (FS) in brain which was used to derive score. The standard EDSS assessments of 7 FS (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder, and cerebral functions) scoring was performed by assessment of neurologic symptoms in each FS. Ambulation scoring was done to conclude evaluation. Individual FS scores were then used in conjugation with ambulation score to obtain EDSS score which ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), with higher scores indicating greater disability. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at baseline and Week 48 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Time to Onset of 12 Weeks Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) From Baseline as Assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score12.29 weeks
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Time to Onset of 12 Weeks Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) From Baseline as Assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score24.14 weeks
Secondary

Part A: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) Confirmed Over at Least 12 Weeks

The 9-HPT was a brief, standardized, quantitative test of upper extremity function (lower bound: 10 seconds; upper bound: 300 seconds). Two consecutive trials with the dominant hand were immediately followed by 2 consecutive trials with the non-dominant hand. The mean time to test completion served as an assessment of the participant's hand dexterity. A participant was asked to place pegs into holes and remove them with the dominant and non-dominant hand for several repetitions. A higher value of overall 9-HPT was indicative of higher disability. An increase of \>=20% from the baseline score in the 9-HPT was considered meaningful worsening. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at baseline and Week 48 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) Confirmed Over at Least 12 Weeks35.86 weeks
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) Confirmed Over at Least 12 Weeks12.14 weeks
Secondary

Part A: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25-FW) Confirmed Over at Least 12 Weeks

The T25-FW test was used to assess a participant's walking ability, time in seconds to walk 25 feet (lower bound: 2.2 seconds; upper bound: 180 seconds). The participant was directed to 1 end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and was instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as safely possible with several repetitions. The mean walk time was used for assessment of the participant's walking ability. An increase of \>20% from the baseline score in the T25-FW test was considered as meaningful worsening. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at baseline and Week 48 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25-FW) Confirmed Over at Least 12 Weeks12.29 weeks
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25-FW) Confirmed Over at Least 12 Weeks18.00 weeks
Secondary

Part A: Volume of Slowly Expanding Lesions (SELs)

The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate volume of SELs. SELs represent chronic active lesions in MS where there is ongoing, smoldering inflammation primarily driven by activated microglia and macrophages at the lesion edges. This localized, radial expansion causes gradual enlargement of pre-existing T2 MRI lesions over time and leads to progressive neural tissue damage including demyelination, axonal loss, and irreversible central nervous system (CNS) injury.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Volume of Slowly Expanding Lesions (SELs)5.436 microliter (µL)
Part A: SAR443820Part A: Volume of Slowly Expanding Lesions (SELs)5.672 microliter (µL)
Secondary

Part B: Annualized Relapse Rate of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Population

Relapse was defined as the occurrence of acute, new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous neurological symptoms with an objective change on neurological examination attributable to MS. Symptoms were as follows: attributed to MS, last for \>=24 hours, present at normal body temperature, and preceded by \>=30 days of clinical stability (no previous MS relapse). The unadjusted ARR was the total number of relapses that occurred during the observation period divided by the total participant years in the study.

Time frame: Approximately up to Week 72

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with RMS (RRMS plus relapsing SPMS) are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Annualized Relapse Rate of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Population0.052 relapses per participant-year
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Annualized Relapse Rate of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Population0.172 relapses per participant-year
Secondary

Part B: Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 Version 2 (MSIS-29v2) Physical and Psychological Domains Scores

The MSIS-29v2 evaluates the specific physical and psychological impact of MS from a participant's perspective. This participant reported outcome instrument has 2 subscales: a physical impact score (20 items) and a psychological impact score (9 items). The physical and psychological impact subscales of the MSIS-29v2 range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater physical or psychological impact. Each of the 2 scales are scored by summing the responses across items, then converting to score range 0-100 where 100 indicates greater impact of disease on daily function (worse health). Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 Version 2 (MSIS-29v2) Physical and Psychological Domains ScoresPhysical domains score11.667 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.447
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 Version 2 (MSIS-29v2) Physical and Psychological Domains ScoresPsychological domains score13.889 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 52.498
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 Version 2 (MSIS-29v2) Physical and Psychological Domains ScoresPhysical domains score2.222 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.925
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 Version 2 (MSIS-29v2) Physical and Psychological Domains ScoresPsychological domains score4.938 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.658
Secondary

Part B: Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale 12 Items (MSWS-12) Scores

The MSWS-12 measured the impact of walking impairment in participants with MS. This participant reported outcome instrument has 12 items with a global score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better quality of life. The MSWS-12 score was calculated by summing the 12 components and transforming into a scale with a range of 0 to 100, with higher score indicating better quality of life. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale 12 Items (MSWS-12) Scores4.861 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.472
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale 12 Items (MSWS-12) Scores-1.389 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.365
Secondary

Part B: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions Conducted at 3 Tesla Capable Sites

The basic MRI scan sequences were performed at all sites and used to evaluate number of PRL. Phase rim lesions were a subtype of MS lesion identified by a paramagnetic edge indicative chronic smoldering inflammation linked to chronic active lesions. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions Conducted at 3 Tesla Capable Sites2.33 phase rim lesionsStandard Deviation 4.93
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions Conducted at 3 Tesla Capable Sites-0.25 phase rim lesionsStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Part B: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding Lesions

The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate normalized T1 intensity of SELs. It was used to quantify tissue damage within SELs of MS, reflecting neuro-axonal loss and demyelination and correlating with clinical progression.

Time frame: Week 48 and Week 72

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsWeek 48-0.342 ratioStandard Deviation 0.118
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsWeek 72-0.507 ratioStandard Deviation 0.236
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsWeek 48-0.083 ratioStandard Deviation 0.241
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding LesionsWeek 72-0.183 ratioStandard Deviation 0.201
Secondary

Part B: Number of New, Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by MRI

Cumulative number of new, enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions detected by MRI, defined as the sum of the individual number of new, enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions at all scheduled visits at all scheduled visits calculated for each arm/group as a whole.

Time frame: From Week 48 to approximately up to Week 72

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with \>=1 new and/or enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Number of New, Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by MRI42 new and enlarging T2 lesions
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Number of New, Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by MRI57 new and enlarging T2 lesions
Secondary

Part B: Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by MRI

Cumulative number of new Gd-enhancing T1 hyperintense lesions detected by MRI, defined as the sum of the individual number of new Gd-enhancing T1 hyperintense lesions at all scheduled visits calculated for each arm/group as a whole.

Time frame: From Week 48 to approximately up to Week 72

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with \>=1 new enlarging T1-hyperintense lesions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by MRI14 new Gd-enhancing T1 lesions
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by MRI13 new Gd-enhancing T1 lesions
Secondary

Part B: Number of Slowly Expanding Lesions

The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate number of SELs. SELs represent chronic active lesions in MS where there is ongoing, smoldering inflammation primarily driven by activated microglia and macrophages at the lesion edges. This localized, radial expansion causes gradual enlargement of pre-existing T2 MRI lesions over time and leads to progressive neural tissue damage including demyelination, axonal loss, and irreversible CNS injury.

Time frame: Approximately up to Week 72

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Number of Slowly Expanding Lesions6.60 number of SELStandard Deviation 9.84
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Number of Slowly Expanding Lesions6.25 number of SELStandard Deviation 5.32
Secondary

Part B: Time to Onset of 24 Weeks Confirmed Disability Progression From Baseline as Assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale Score

Time to onset of 24 weeks CDP was defined as time from randomization to onset of an increase in EDSS score (defined as an increase of \>=1.0 point from baseline EDSS score when baseline score was \<=5.5 or an increase of \>=0.5 points from baseline EDSS score when baseline score was \>5.5) confirmed after a 12 weeks interval. EDSS was a scale for assessing neurologic impairment in participants with MS, based on 7 FS in brain which was used to derive score. The standard EDSS assessments of 7 FS (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder, and cerebral functions) scoring was performed by assessment of neurologic symptoms in each FS. Ambulation scoring was done to conclude evaluation. Individual FS scores were then used in conjugation with ambulation score to obtain EDSS score which ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), with higher scores indicating greater disability. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Time to Onset of 24 Weeks Confirmed Disability Progression From Baseline as Assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale Score12.43 weeks
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Time to Onset of 24 Weeks Confirmed Disability Progression From Baseline as Assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale Score24.14 weeks
Secondary

Part B: Time to Onset of Composite Confirmed Disability Progression Confirmed Over at Least 24 Weeks

Time to onset of 24-week CCDP, was assessed by composite endpoint EDSS-Plus (EDSS score, or T25-FW test, or 9-HPT), was confirmed over at least 24 week. The EDSS-plus event was defined as disability progression on at least 1 of 3 components, EDSS score, or T25-FW test, or 9-HPT. Disability criteria for the individual components are defined as follows: Disability progression on the EDSS was defined as an increase of \>=1.0 point from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was \<=5.5 or an increase of \>=0.5 points from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was \>5.5. Disability progression on the T25-FW test was defined as an increase (worsening) of \>=20% from the baseline score. Disability progression on the 9-HPT was defined as an increase (worsening) of \>=20% from the baseline score. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Time to Onset of Composite Confirmed Disability Progression Confirmed Over at Least 24 Weeks12.29 weeks
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Time to Onset of Composite Confirmed Disability Progression Confirmed Over at Least 24 Weeks24.00 weeks
Secondary

Part B: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in 9-Hole Peg Test Confirmed Over at Least 24 Weeks

The 9-HPT was a brief, standardized, quantitative test of upper extremity function (lower bound: 10 seconds; upper bound: 300 seconds). Two consecutive trials with the dominant hand were immediately followed by 2 consecutive trials with the non-dominant hand. The mean time to test completion served as an assessment of the participant's hand dexterity. A participant was asked to place pegs into holes and remove them with the dominant and non-dominant hand for several repetitions. A higher value of overall 9-HPT was indicative of higher disability. An increase of \>20% from the baseline score in the 9-HPT was considered meaningful worsening. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in 9-Hole Peg Test Confirmed Over at Least 24 Weeks36.1 weeks
Secondary

Part B: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in Timed 25-Foot Walk Test Confirmed Over at Least 24 Weeks

The T25-FW test was used to assess a participant's walking ability, time in seconds to walk 25 feet (lower bound: 2.2 seconds; upper bound: 180 seconds). The participant was directed to one end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and was instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as safely possible with several repetitions. The mean walk time was used for assessment of the participant's walking ability. An increase of \>20% from the baseline score in the T25-FW test was considered as meaningful worsening. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in Timed 25-Foot Walk Test Confirmed Over at Least 24 Weeks12.14 weeks
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in Timed 25-Foot Walk Test Confirmed Over at Least 24 Weeks18.00 weeks
Secondary

Part B: Volume of Slowly Expanding Lesions

The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate volume of SELs. SELs represent chronic active lesions in MS where there is ongoing, smoldering inflammation primarily driven by activated microglia and macrophages at the lesion edges. This localized, radial expansion causes gradual enlargement of pre-existing T2 MRI lesions over time and leads to progressive neural tissue damage including demyelination, axonal loss, and irreversible CNS injury.

Time frame: Approximately up to Week 72

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboPart B: Volume of Slowly Expanding Lesions1485.00 µLStandard Deviation 2657.22
Part A: SAR443820Part B: Volume of Slowly Expanding Lesions1152.00 µLStandard Deviation 998.67
Secondary

Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale Score

EDSS was a scale for assessing neurologic impairment in participants with MS, based on 7 FS in the brain which was used to derive the EDSS (score). The standard EDSS assessments of 7 FS (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder, and cerebral functions) scoring was performed by assessment of neurologic symptoms in each FS. Ambulation scoring was done to conclude the evaluation. Individual FS scores were then used in conjugation with ambulation score to obtain EDSS score which ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), with higher scores indicating greater disability. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48 (Part A) and approximately up to Week 72 (Part B)

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboParts A and B: Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale Score-0.013 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.611
Part A: SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale Score-0.023 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.676
Part B: Placebo/SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale Score-0.167 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.722
Part B: SAR443820/SAR443820Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale Score-1.000 score on a scale
Secondary

Parts A and B: Percent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume Loss (BVL) as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate BVL. Imaging measure to detect degree of atrophy or decrease in whole brain, cortical and/or thalamic volume, which was diagnostic evidence of disease progression and played a key role in long-term disability. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48 (Part A) and approximately up to Week 72 (Part B)

Population: Randomized and treated population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A: PlaceboParts A and B: Percent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume Loss (BVL) as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging-0.177 percent changeStandard Deviation 0.426
Part A: SAR443820Parts A and B: Percent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume Loss (BVL) as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging-0.397 percent changeStandard Deviation 0.462
Part B: Placebo/SAR443820Parts A and B: Percent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume Loss (BVL) as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging-0.502 percent changeStandard Deviation 0.526
Part B: SAR443820/SAR443820Parts A and B: Percent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume Loss (BVL) as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging-0.462 percent changeStandard Deviation 0.869
Secondary

Parts B and A+B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) After SAR443820 Initiation

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. TEAEs were defined as the AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period (defined as time from first administration of study treatment (Day 1) to last administration of study treatment + 14 days). SAE: Any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. All TEAE occurring after SAR443820 initiation are provided for both randomized treatment arms in this endpoint.

Time frame: From first dose of SAR443820 (Day 1, post-dose) up to 14 days after last dose of SAR443820 administration in Part B, approximately 93 weeks for Parts A+B combined arm (SAR443820/SAR443820), approximately 45 weeks Part B Arm (Placebo/SAR443820)

Population: Safety population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of SAR443820. All participants from safety population and treated with SAR443820 are included in Part B arm and participants from safety population are included in Parts A+B arm. The combined safety analysis for TEAE provided the accurate summary of all TEAE in both treatment groups after the initiation of SAR443820.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A: PlaceboParts B and A+B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) After SAR443820 InitiationTEAEs39 Participants
Part A: PlaceboParts B and A+B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) After SAR443820 InitiationTESAEs5 Participants
Part A: SAR443820Parts B and A+B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) After SAR443820 InitiationTEAEs108 Participants
Part A: SAR443820Parts B and A+B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) After SAR443820 InitiationTESAEs7 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026