Skip to content

10-year Follow-up After Tibial Tubercle Transposition

Long-term Outcomes and Development of Retropatellar Chondropathy After Tibial Tubercle Distomedialisation for Patellar Maltracking and Patella Alta Without Instability: 10 Year Follow-up of a Prospective Cohort

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05629754
Acronym
TTTfollow-up
Enrollment
32
Registered
2022-11-29
Start date
2023-11-18
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2023-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Knee Pain Syndrome

Keywords

Tibial tubercle transfer, Long-term follow-up

Brief summary

Patellofemoral pain is a common complaint especially in young adults. It can be caused by patellar maltracking. Part of this is a patella alta. When patellar maltracking is the cause of the problem and conservative therapy fails, surgery, a tibial tuberosity transposition, may be considered. Most research has been done in patients with recurrent patella luxation. However, in patients without luxation, research is scarce. It is known that patients with patella alta have an increased risk of developing patellofemoral chondropathy due to increased pressure. With this study, we aim to investigate whether and how a tibial tuberosity transposition in patients with patella alta and no instability affects the degree of patellofemoral chondropathy and patient satisfaction after 10 years. This will allow us to educate patients regarding long-term outcomes better.

Detailed description

Anterior knee pain is a common complaint, especially in younger and active adults. An obvious source for anterior knee pain is patellar maltracking, which is often associated with patella alta (a high-riding patella). Due to maltracking, the cartilage of the patella can face a greater amount of pressure, which can cause cartilage damage. When conservative treatment fails, a surgical intervention can be considered. One of the surgical options is performing a tibial tubercle transfer (TTT), where the patella is being distalized and medialized. As a result, the improvement in patellar tracking will reduce the pressure on the retropatellar cartilage. The TTT has been proven effective in patients with patellar instability but less is known about patients without instability. Specifically, whether these patients face a higher risk of developing retropatellar cartilage damage ('retropatellar chondropathy') due to this intervention is currently unknown. The primary aim of this study is to determine the incidence and the degree of retropatellar chondropathy 10 years after a TTT in patients with anterior knee pain without patellar instability. The secondary aim is to evaluate the long-term patient reported outcomes (PROMs) 10 years after a TTT in patients with anterior knee pain without patellar instability.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTMRI, radiological assessment

MRI and radiological assessment of the involved knee

Sponsors

Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre for Orthopaedic Research Alkmaar
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 80 years * Participated in an earlier cohort study * Underwent a tibial tubercle transposition between 2012 and 2015 * Preoperative MRI available

Exclusion criteria

* No preoperative MRI is available * Patellar-related surgery after the initial surgery * Female patients that are (expecting to be) pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Outerbridge Classification10-year follow-up assessmentDegree of retropatellar cartilage damage

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patellar height10-year follow-up assessmentPatellar height measured by radiological assessment lateral view
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire10-year follow-up assessmentKOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). The previous week is the time period considered when answering the questions. Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Score (AKPS) questionnaireOne measurementThe Kujala AKPS is a 13-item screening instrument designed to assess patellofemoral pain in adolescents and young adults, with a variable ordinal response format (e.g., no pain (5) to constant pain (0)). Total scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating less symptoms.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain10-year follow-up assessmentThe pain VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, scored from 0 (no pain) to 100 (highest possible pain intensity).

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026