Skip to content

Effect of Interceptive Strategies on the Clinical Outcome of Maxillary Impacted Canines

Effect of Interceptive Strategies on the Clinical Outcome of Maxillary Impacted Canines

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05629312
Enrollment
84
Registered
2022-11-29
Start date
2016-09-12
Completion date
2023-10-30
Last updated
2025-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth, Impacted

Keywords

Interceptive orthodontics, maxillary canines, maxillary expansion, Tooth extraction, deciduous tooth

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate the effect of 3 randomly applied interceptive measures (slow maxillary expansion, extraction of deciduous canines and no intervention) on maxillary canine impaction in patients with early mixed dentition and lack of space in the dental arch. Additionally, these groups are compared with a control group with adequate space. Patients with at least one impacted maxillary canine, presence of deciduous canines and absence of crossbite were included. The canine position is assessed by measuring five variables (sector of the canine cusp, canine to midline angle, canine to first premolar angle, canine cusp to midline distance, and canine cusp to maxillary plane distance) on 2 panoramic radiographs at 0 (T1) and 18 months (T2).

Detailed description

The detailed information regarding methodology has been entered in following sections

Interventions

PROCEDUREMaxillary expansion

The upper jaw is expanded with a removable expansion plate

PROCEDUREExtraction of deciduous upper canines

Both deciduous upper canines are extracted in this group

Sponsors

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 11 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All patients presenting at the intake consultation of the Department of Orthodontics of University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium from September 2016, with at least one maxillary permanent canine impaction are invited to participate. Canine impaction is diagnosed based on a panoramic radiograph, taken for standard evaluation of dental development and associated pathology. A maxillary canine is considered to be impacted when the canine to midline angle was ≥15° (Alqerban et al. 2014; Warford et al. 2003). Only impacted maxillary canines with incomplete root formation and with persisting deciduous canines are included.

Exclusion criteria

* presence of uni- or bilateral posterior dental crossbite, * upper permanent canines showing root malformation, ankylosis or fully erupted, * evidence of root resorption of adjacent teeth, previous orthodontic treatment, * craniofacial syndromes, * systemic disease that would impede orthodontic treatment/surgery and recent exposure to radiotherapy. * large eruption follicles seen on the permanent canines

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Definitive Upper Canines That Erupt Spontaneously up to 18 Months of Follow up18 monthsNumber of definitive upper canines that erupt spontaneously up to 18 months of follow up.
Number of Definitive Upper Canines That Erupt Spontaneously After 18 Months of Follow upAfter the first 18 months of follow upNumber of definitive upper canines that erupt spontaneously after 18 months of follow up..

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angulation of the Canine Towards the First Premolar18 monthsChange in the Angulation of the canine towards the first premolar
Distance Between the Canine Cusp and the Midline18 monthsChange in the Distance between the canine cusp and the midline
Sector Where the Canine is Located18 monthsThe sector is the position where the canine overlaps with adjacent teeth in a panoramic radiograph. The distance between the dental midline and the premolars is divided in 5 equally large spaces (units or categories 0 to 4) defined as follows: 0 = normal position (the cusp of the definitive canine is at the primary canine), 1 = distal to the long axis of the lateral incisor, 2 = mesial to the long axis of the lateral incisor, 3 = distal to the long axis of the central incisor, or 4 = mesial to the long axis of the central incisor This outcome measurement refers to the change in the Sector category where the canine is located, measured on a panoramic RX
Need for Further Minor and/or Major Orthodontic Intervention18 months after baselineNeed for further minor and/or major orthodontic interventions
Distance Between the Canine Cusp and the Occlusal Plane18 monthsChenge in the Distance between the canine cusp and the occlusal plane, measured on a
Angulation of the Canine Towards the Dental Midline18 monthsChange in the Angulation of the canine towards the dental midline, measured on a panoramic RX

Countries

Belgium

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Maxillary Expansion
All included patients (in all arms) present (at least one) maxillary canine impaction. Patients in this arm present also lack of space in the upper jaw and are treated with maxillary expansion Maxillary expansion: The upper jaw is expanded with a removable expansion plate
19
Extraction of Deciduous Canines
All included patients (in all arms) present (at least one) maxillary canine impaction. Patients in this arm present also lack of space in the upper jaw and are treated with extraction of deciduous canines Extraction of deciduous upper canines: Both deciduous upper canines are extracted in this group
17
No Intervention
All included patients (in all arms) present (at least one) maxillary canine impaction. Patients in this arm present also lack of space in the upper jaw and no intervention is performed
14
Control
All included patients (in all arms) present (at least one) maxillary canine impaction. Patients in this arm do not present lack of space in the upper jaw and no intervention is performed
26
Total76

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalMaxillary ExpansionExtraction of Deciduous CaninesNo InterventionControl
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
76 Participants19 Participants17 Participants14 Participants26 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous9.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.32
8.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.16
9.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.46
9.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.23
9.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.44
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
76 Participants19 Participants17 Participants14 Participants26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
76 Participants19 Participants17 Participants14 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants11 Participants8 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants8 Participants9 Participants8 Participants21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 170 / 140 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 170 / 140 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 170 / 140 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Definitive Upper Canines That Erupt Spontaneously After 18 Months of Follow up

Number of definitive upper canines that erupt spontaneously after 18 months of follow up..

Time frame: After the first 18 months of follow up

Population: This outcome measure (number 2) analyzes the amount of maxillary canines that have erupted per studied group after 18 months of the start of trial. Each included participant has two upper canines, all of them were analyzed. The Outcome Measure Data Table describes how many erupted after 18 months from all analyzed canines.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Maxillary ExpansionNumber of Definitive Upper Canines That Erupt Spontaneously After 18 Months of Follow up4 number of canines
Extraction of Deciduous CaninesNumber of Definitive Upper Canines That Erupt Spontaneously After 18 Months of Follow up4 number of canines
No InterventionNumber of Definitive Upper Canines That Erupt Spontaneously After 18 Months of Follow up6 number of canines
ControlNumber of Definitive Upper Canines That Erupt Spontaneously After 18 Months of Follow up15 number of canines
Primary

Number of Definitive Upper Canines That Erupt Spontaneously up to 18 Months of Follow up

Number of definitive upper canines that erupt spontaneously up to 18 months of follow up.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: This outcome measure (number 1) analyzes the amount of maxillary canines that have erupted per studied group within 18 months of the start of trial. Each included participant has two upper canines, all of them were analyzed. The Outcome Measure Data Table describes how many erupted after 18 months from all analyzed canines.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Maxillary ExpansionNumber of Definitive Upper Canines That Erupt Spontaneously up to 18 Months of Follow up3 number of canines
Extraction of Deciduous CaninesNumber of Definitive Upper Canines That Erupt Spontaneously up to 18 Months of Follow up2 number of canines
No InterventionNumber of Definitive Upper Canines That Erupt Spontaneously up to 18 Months of Follow up1 number of canines
ControlNumber of Definitive Upper Canines That Erupt Spontaneously up to 18 Months of Follow up4 number of canines
Secondary

Angulation of the Canine Towards the Dental Midline

Change in the Angulation of the canine towards the dental midline, measured on a panoramic RX

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Maxillary ExpansionAngulation of the Canine Towards the Dental Midline-11.85 Degrees
Extraction of Deciduous CaninesAngulation of the Canine Towards the Dental Midline-8.16 Degrees
No InterventionAngulation of the Canine Towards the Dental Midline-7.68 Degrees
ControlAngulation of the Canine Towards the Dental Midline-11.29 Degrees
Secondary

Angulation of the Canine Towards the First Premolar

Change in the Angulation of the canine towards the first premolar

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Maxillary ExpansionAngulation of the Canine Towards the First Premolar-2.27 Degrees
Extraction of Deciduous CaninesAngulation of the Canine Towards the First Premolar-3.13 Degrees
No InterventionAngulation of the Canine Towards the First Premolar0.08 Degrees
ControlAngulation of the Canine Towards the First Premolar-2.57 Degrees
Secondary

Distance Between the Canine Cusp and the Midline

Change in the Distance between the canine cusp and the midline

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Maxillary ExpansionDistance Between the Canine Cusp and the Midline0.83 millimeters
Extraction of Deciduous CaninesDistance Between the Canine Cusp and the Midline0.57 millimeters
No InterventionDistance Between the Canine Cusp and the Midline-0.51 millimeters
ControlDistance Between the Canine Cusp and the Midline1.77 millimeters
Secondary

Distance Between the Canine Cusp and the Occlusal Plane

Chenge in the Distance between the canine cusp and the occlusal plane, measured on a

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Maxillary ExpansionDistance Between the Canine Cusp and the Occlusal Plane-6.31 millimeters
Extraction of Deciduous CaninesDistance Between the Canine Cusp and the Occlusal Plane-4.79 millimeters
No InterventionDistance Between the Canine Cusp and the Occlusal Plane-7.10 millimeters
ControlDistance Between the Canine Cusp and the Occlusal Plane-9.14 millimeters
Secondary

Need for Further Minor and/or Major Orthodontic Intervention

Need for further minor and/or major orthodontic interventions

Time frame: 18 months after baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Maxillary ExpansionNeed for Further Minor and/or Major Orthodontic InterventionMAjor intervention4 Participants
Maxillary ExpansionNeed for Further Minor and/or Major Orthodontic InterventionMinor intervention8 Participants
Extraction of Deciduous CaninesNeed for Further Minor and/or Major Orthodontic InterventionMAjor intervention9 Participants
Extraction of Deciduous CaninesNeed for Further Minor and/or Major Orthodontic InterventionMinor intervention2 Participants
No InterventionNeed for Further Minor and/or Major Orthodontic InterventionMinor intervention0 Participants
No InterventionNeed for Further Minor and/or Major Orthodontic InterventionMAjor intervention7 Participants
ControlNeed for Further Minor and/or Major Orthodontic InterventionMAjor intervention2 Participants
ControlNeed for Further Minor and/or Major Orthodontic InterventionMinor intervention5 Participants
Secondary

Sector Where the Canine is Located

The sector is the position where the canine overlaps with adjacent teeth in a panoramic radiograph. The distance between the dental midline and the premolars is divided in 5 equally large spaces (units or categories 0 to 4) defined as follows: 0 = normal position (the cusp of the definitive canine is at the primary canine), 1 = distal to the long axis of the lateral incisor, 2 = mesial to the long axis of the lateral incisor, 3 = distal to the long axis of the central incisor, or 4 = mesial to the long axis of the central incisor This outcome measurement refers to the change in the Sector category where the canine is located, measured on a panoramic RX

Time frame: 18 months

Population: Mean change in sector unit (where the canine is located) during the study period (18 months) per group

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Maxillary ExpansionSector Where the Canine is Located-0.22 Change in sector unit
Extraction of Deciduous CaninesSector Where the Canine is Located-0.15 Change in sector unit
No InterventionSector Where the Canine is Located0.11 Change in sector unit
ControlSector Where the Canine is Located-0.10 Change in sector unit

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026