Skip to content

Development of a Training Intervention to Improve Mental Health Treatment Effectiveness and Engagement for Youth With Documented Mental Health Disparities

Development of a Training Intervention to Improve Mental Health Treatment Effectiveness and Engagement for Youth With Documented Mental Health Disparities

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05626231
Enrollment
286
Registered
2022-11-23
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
2025-08-31
Last updated
2025-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Keywords

youth, child, adolescent, young adult, psychologist, social worker, psychiatrist, counselor, teen, provider, therapist, clinician

Brief summary

The overall goal of the larger 3-aim study is to develop and pilot test a training intervention to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients. Aim 3 (registered here) of the study is an open trial pilot study at a multi-clinic mental health agency, aimed at examining the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a future randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Detailed description

The overall goal of the larger 3-aim study is to develop and pilot test a training intervention to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients. The Boston College Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved protocol #21.247.01-15. Aim 1 involved designing the training intervention through an extensive literature review and community-engaged methods that centered on collaborations with providers, youth patients, and parents. Aim 2 (in progress) entails refining the training intervention via human centered design methods. Aim 3 (registered here) of the study is an open trial pilot study at a multi-clinic mental health agency, aimed at examining the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a future randomized controlled trial (RCT). Effectiveness and implementation data from both providers (n=49) and patients (i.e., youth and their parents; n=50 GMY and n=30 caregivers) will be collected and analyzed. Primary outcomes are measured at the provider-level and secondary outcomes are measured at the patient-level (i.e., patients and their parents).

Interventions

The training intervention is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as pilot site herein).

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Boston College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The single-arm intervention will test an online, asynchronous training intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

For provider participants: * Mental health care providers (e.g., psychologists, social workers) employed by the pilot site at the time of the pilot test and who work with clients ages 12-25 * Age 18 or older * Fluent in English For GMY participants: * Identify as a gender-minority. * Age 12-25 * Currently receiving mental health services from the pilot site * Fluent in English For parents of youth participants: * Parents of youth currently receiving mental health services at the pilot site * 18 or older * Fluent in English

Exclusion criteria

* Provided that participants meet the aforementioned inclusion criteria, there are no explicit criteria for exclusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Provider Participant Recruitment Rates (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)At time of training interventionPercent of providers at pilot site who consented to participate in the study relative to number of employed providers at pilot site.
Change in Provider Participant Assessment Completion Rates at Post-training (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)Pre-training to post-training (up to 4 weeks after the training)Change in the percent of providers who complete pre- and post- assessments of those who consented to participate. These assessment completion rates will also be compared to the 6- and 12-month assessment completion rates.
Change in Provider Participant Assessment Completion Rates at 6-month Followup (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)Post-training (up to 4 weeks after the training) to 6-month followupChange in the percent of providers who complete post- and 6-month followup assessments of those who consented to participate. These assessment completion rates will also be compared to the pre-training and 12-month assessment completion rates.
Change in Provider Participant Assessment Completion Rates at 12-month Followup (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)6-month followup to 12-month followupChange in the percent of providers who complete 6- and 12-month followup assessments of those who consented to participate. These assessment completion rates will also be compared to the pre-training and post-training assessment completion rates.
Change in the Adoption of Practices Learned in the Training Intervention at 12-month FollowupBaseline, Post-training, 6-month to 12-month followupA self-report survey measuring whether, and the extent to which, provider participants used the practices they learned in the training intervention. The survey is currently being developed and will be adapted based on the Pachankis et al. (2022) measure Providers' Familiarity With and Use of LGBTQ-affirmative CBT Skills. The survey will be administered at the 6- and 12 month followups to see the change over time. Scores are calculated using mean scores for values 0-4 with higher numbers indicating more of the use of the practice (i.e., (0) Not at all, (4) Very much)
Electronic Monitoring of Training Intervention Completion (Adoption of Training Intervention)up to the 12-month followupElectronic monitoring of training intervention completion by providers (i.e., whether all modules were completed).
Primary Outcome: Electronic Monitoring of Training Intervention Engagement (Adoption of Training Intervention)up to the 12-month followupElectronic monitoring of training intervention engagement (e.g., days spent completing the training)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Client Behavioral Engagement by Session ParticipationWeekly from pre-intervention to 12 months after training intervention completionAvailable chart data from clients of providers who completed the intervention will be monitored for their behavioral engagement. Session participation will be measured by electronic health record monitoring of treatment measures completion (e.g., answering all questions and submitting measures related to client treatment, such as the TAQs).
Symptoms and Functionality Severity Scale (Client Symptomatology & Functioning)Monthly from pre-intervention to 12-month follow upThe Symptoms and Functionality Severity Scale which is a 13-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers to reflect on behaviors, thoughts, and feelings that the client had in the last 2 weeks. Items are rated on a 5-point scale with higher responses corresponding to more frequent experiences of negative behaviors, thoughts, and feelings (e.g., 1= Never, 2= Hardly Ever, 3= Sometimes, 4= Often, and 5= Very Often). Scores can range from 33 to 86 for youths, where a high score represents high severity and a low score indicates low severity. Total scores are calculated by adding the rating and then divide the sum by the number of items to calculate the average score.The SFSS will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers. Outcomes report pre-intervention SFSS score (i.e., first instance of participant completing SFSS prior-to intervention) and 12-month follow-up SFSS score.
Client Behavioral Engagement by Session AttendanceWeekly from pre-intervention to 12 months after training intervention completionAvailable chart data from clients of providers who completed the intervention will be monitored for their behavioral engagement. Session attendance will be measured as an aspect of behavioral engagement by noting attended and canceled sessions. Outcomes report the total number of GMY participants who attended therapy during the timeframe
Therapeutic Alliance Quality Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)Weekly from pre-intervention to 12-month follow upThe Therapeutic Alliance Quality Scale (TAQS) is a 5-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers to reflect on their last session with their therapist. Items are rated on a 5-point scale with higher responses corresponding to higher quality alliance (e.g., 1= Not at all, 2= Only a little, 3= Somewhat, 4= Quite a bit, and 5= Totally). The TAQS will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers. Outcomes report pre-intervention TAQs score (i.e., first instance of participant completing TAQs prior-to intervention) and 12-month follow-up TAQs score.
Service Satisfaction Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)Every other week from pre-intervention to 12-month follow upThe Service Satisfaction Scale (SSS) is a 5-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers to reflect on how satisfied they are with the mental health services that they receive. Items are rated on a 4-point scale with higher responses corresponding to higher service satisfaction (e.g., 1= No, definitely not, 2= No, not really, 3= Yes, generally, and 4= Yes, definitely). The SSS will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers. Outcomes report pre-intervention SSS score (i.e., first instance of participant completing SSS prior-to intervention) and 12-month follow-up SSS score.
Treatment Outcomes Expectation Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)Pre-interventionThe Treatment Outcomes Expectation Scale (TOES) is a 8-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers about their expectations from counseling. Items are rated on a 3-point scale with higher responses corresponding to more expectations (e.g., 1= I do not expect this, 2= I am not sure, and 3= I do expect this). The TOES will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers.
Treatment Process Expectations Index (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)Pre-interventionThe Treatment Process Expectations Index is a 9-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers about their expectations about counseling. Items are rated on a 3-point scale (e.g., 1= I do not expect this, 2= I am not sure, and 3= I do expect this). There is no right or wrong answer. The reported scores should be interpreted at the item level to identify clinical suggestions for providers based on the clients reported expectations at baseline. The TPEI will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers.
Ohio Functioning Scale (Client Functioning)Monthly from pre-intervention to 12-month follow upThe Ohio Functioning Scale is a 20-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers to answer questions regarding how the client's problems may get in the way of everyday activities. Items are rated on a 5-point scale with higher responses corresponding to better ability to do everyday activities (e.g., 0= Extreme troubles, 1= Quite a few troubles, 2= Some troubles, 3= Ok, and 4= Doing very well). A total functioning score ranges from 20-100 and is calculated by summing the ratings for all 20 items. Higher scores are indicative of better functioning. The Ohio Functioning Scale will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers. Outcomes report pre-intervention Ohio score (i.e., first instance of participant completing Ohio prior-to intervention) and 12-month follow-up Ohio score.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Providers were not actively recruited, but rather, all partner clinic mental health providers (e.g., psychiatrists, social workers) were invited to participate in the study. Youth patients and their parents recruitment involved sending an interest email to the partner clinic's listserv of all patients and paretnss. Otherwise, youth will be included in the study if they received treatment at the clinic during the open trial phase and were between the ages of 12-25.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Training Intervention
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous. training intervention. The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth patients, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as pilot site herein).
286
Total286

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Provider EnrollmentNon-clinical employee1
Provider EnrollmentOn leave (e.g., parental leave)3
Provider EnrollmentOther5
Provider EnrollmentProvider does not see clients3
Provider EnrollmentWorked part-time4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTraining Intervention
Age, Continuous
Parents of Youth Patients
NA years
Age, Continuous
Providers
37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Age, Continuous
Youth Patients
16 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
Age, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
>18
0 Participants
Age, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
18-65
0 Participants
Age, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
65<
0 Participants
Age, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
Not reported
68 Participants
Age, Customized
Providers
>18
0 Participants
Age, Customized
Providers
18-65
81 Participants
Age, Customized
Providers
65<
2 Participants
Age, Customized
Providers
Not reported
10 Participants
Age, Customized
Youth Patients
>18
51 Participants
Age, Customized
Youth Patients
18-65
74 Participants
Age, Customized
Youth Patients
65<
0 Participants
Age, Customized
Youth Patients
Not reported
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parents of Youth Patients
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parents of Youth Patients
Not Hispanic or Latino
59 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parents of Youth Patients
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Providers
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Providers
Not Hispanic or Latino
78 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Providers
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Youth Patients
Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Youth Patients
Not Hispanic or Latino
66 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Youth Patients
Unknown or Not Reported
48 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
American Indian or Alaska Native:
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
Asian:
7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
Black or African American:
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
More than one race:
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander:
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
Other:
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
Unknown:
6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
White:
52 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers
American Indian or Alaska Native:
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers
Asian:
6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers
Black or African American:
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers
More than one race:
4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander:
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers
Other:
5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers
Unknown:
11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers
White:
65 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients
American Indian or Alaska Native:
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients
Asian:
6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients
Black or African American:
5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients
More than one race:
15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander:
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients
Other:
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients
Unknown:
47 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients
White:
50 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
286 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
Cisgender Men
18 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
Cisgender Women
45 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
Nonbinary/genderqueer
0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
Not Reported
5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
Transgender Men
0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients
Transgender Women
0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Providers
Cisgender Men
13 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Providers
Cisgender Women
66 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Providers
Nonbinary/genderqueer
4 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Providers
Not Reported
10 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Providers
Transgender Men
0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Providers
Transgender Women
0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Youth Patients
Cisgender Men
0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Youth Patients
Cisgender Women
0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Youth Patients
Nonbinary/genderqueer
58 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Youth Patients
Not Reported
43 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Youth Patients
Transgender Men
14 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Youth Patients
Transgender Women
10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1090 / 1250 / 68
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1090 / 1250 / 68
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1090 / 1250 / 68

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Provider Participant Assessment Completion Rates at 12-month Followup (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)

Change in the percent of providers who complete 6- and 12-month followup assessments of those who consented to participate. These assessment completion rates will also be compared to the pre-training and post-training assessment completion rates.

Time frame: 6-month followup to 12-month followup

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Training InterventionChange in Provider Participant Assessment Completion Rates at 12-month Followup (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)46 Participants
Primary

Change in Provider Participant Assessment Completion Rates at 6-month Followup (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)

Change in the percent of providers who complete post- and 6-month followup assessments of those who consented to participate. These assessment completion rates will also be compared to the pre-training and 12-month assessment completion rates.

Time frame: Post-training (up to 4 weeks after the training) to 6-month followup

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Training InterventionChange in Provider Participant Assessment Completion Rates at 6-month Followup (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)47 Participants
Primary

Change in Provider Participant Assessment Completion Rates at Post-training (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)

Change in the percent of providers who complete pre- and post- assessments of those who consented to participate. These assessment completion rates will also be compared to the 6- and 12-month assessment completion rates.

Time frame: Pre-training to post-training (up to 4 weeks after the training)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Training InterventionChange in Provider Participant Assessment Completion Rates at Post-training (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)79 Participants
Primary

Change in the Adoption of Practices Learned in the Training Intervention at 12-month Followup

A self-report survey measuring whether, and the extent to which, provider participants used the practices they learned in the training intervention. The survey is currently being developed and will be adapted based on the Pachankis et al. (2022) measure Providers' Familiarity With and Use of LGBTQ-affirmative CBT Skills. The survey will be administered at the 6- and 12 month followups to see the change over time. Scores are calculated using mean scores for values 0-4 with higher numbers indicating more of the use of the practice (i.e., (0) Not at all, (4) Very much)

Time frame: Baseline, Post-training, 6-month to 12-month followup

Population: Some provider participants did not complete adoption measures at certain time-points

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Training InterventionChange in the Adoption of Practices Learned in the Training Intervention at 12-month FollowupBaseline2.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Training InterventionChange in the Adoption of Practices Learned in the Training Intervention at 12-month FollowupPost-training3.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Training InterventionChange in the Adoption of Practices Learned in the Training Intervention at 12-month Followup6-month follow-up2.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Training InterventionChange in the Adoption of Practices Learned in the Training Intervention at 12-month Followup12-month follow-up3.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
Primary

Electronic Monitoring of Training Intervention Completion (Adoption of Training Intervention)

Electronic monitoring of training intervention completion by providers (i.e., whether all modules were completed).

Time frame: up to the 12-month followup

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Training InterventionElectronic Monitoring of Training Intervention Completion (Adoption of Training Intervention)78 Participants
Primary

Primary Outcome: Electronic Monitoring of Training Intervention Engagement (Adoption of Training Intervention)

Electronic monitoring of training intervention engagement (e.g., days spent completing the training)

Time frame: up to the 12-month followup

Population: Of the 93 participants who started the training, 78 completed the training. Thus, those 78 providers were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Training InterventionPrimary Outcome: Electronic Monitoring of Training Intervention Engagement (Adoption of Training Intervention)18.88 DaysStandard Deviation 31.2
Primary

Provider Participant Recruitment Rates (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)

Percent of providers at pilot site who consented to participate in the study relative to number of employed providers at pilot site.

Time frame: At time of training intervention

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Training InterventionProvider Participant Recruitment Rates (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)93 Participants
Secondary

Client Behavioral Engagement by Session Attendance

Available chart data from clients of providers who completed the intervention will be monitored for their behavioral engagement. Session attendance will be measured as an aspect of behavioral engagement by noting attended and canceled sessions. Outcomes report the total number of GMY participants who attended therapy during the timeframe

Time frame: Weekly from pre-intervention to 12 months after training intervention completion

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Training InterventionClient Behavioral Engagement by Session Attendance125 Participants
Secondary

Client Behavioral Engagement by Session Participation

Available chart data from clients of providers who completed the intervention will be monitored for their behavioral engagement. Session participation will be measured by electronic health record monitoring of treatment measures completion (e.g., answering all questions and submitting measures related to client treatment, such as the TAQs).

Time frame: Weekly from pre-intervention to 12 months after training intervention completion

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Training InterventionClient Behavioral Engagement by Session ParticipationYouth Patients125 Participants
Training InterventionClient Behavioral Engagement by Session ParticipationParents of Youth Patients68 Participants
Secondary

Ohio Functioning Scale (Client Functioning)

The Ohio Functioning Scale is a 20-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers to answer questions regarding how the client's problems may get in the way of everyday activities. Items are rated on a 5-point scale with higher responses corresponding to better ability to do everyday activities (e.g., 0= Extreme troubles, 1= Quite a few troubles, 2= Some troubles, 3= Ok, and 4= Doing very well). A total functioning score ranges from 20-100 and is calculated by summing the ratings for all 20 items. Higher scores are indicative of better functioning. The Ohio Functioning Scale will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers. Outcomes report pre-intervention Ohio score (i.e., first instance of participant completing Ohio prior-to intervention) and 12-month follow-up Ohio score.

Time frame: Monthly from pre-intervention to 12-month follow up

Population: 56 participants total completed the OHIO measure. 2 youth participants and 1 caregiver participant completed the measure at both the pre- and 12-month follow-up timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Training InterventionOhio Functioning Scale (Client Functioning)Youth Patients, Pre-intervention37.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.63
Training InterventionOhio Functioning Scale (Client Functioning)Youth Patients, 12-month follow-Up59.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.57
Training InterventionOhio Functioning Scale (Client Functioning)Parent of Youth Patients, Pre-intervention33.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.87
Training InterventionOhio Functioning Scale (Client Functioning)Parent of Youth Patients, 12-month follow-up62.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.59
Secondary

Service Satisfaction Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)

The Service Satisfaction Scale (SSS) is a 5-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers to reflect on how satisfied they are with the mental health services that they receive. Items are rated on a 4-point scale with higher responses corresponding to higher service satisfaction (e.g., 1= No, definitely not, 2= No, not really, 3= Yes, generally, and 4= Yes, definitely). The SSS will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers. Outcomes report pre-intervention SSS score (i.e., first instance of participant completing SSS prior-to intervention) and 12-month follow-up SSS score.

Time frame: Every other week from pre-intervention to 12-month follow up

Population: 60 participants total completed the SSS measure. 3 youth participants and 1 caregiver participants completed the measure at both the pre- and 12-month follow-up timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Training InterventionService Satisfaction Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)Youth Patients, Pre-intervention3.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Training InterventionService Satisfaction Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)Youth Patients, 12-month follow-up3.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Training InterventionService Satisfaction Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)Parents of Youth Patients, pre-intervention3.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Training InterventionService Satisfaction Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)Parents of Youth Patients, 12-month follow-up3.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
Secondary

Symptoms and Functionality Severity Scale (Client Symptomatology & Functioning)

The Symptoms and Functionality Severity Scale which is a 13-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers to reflect on behaviors, thoughts, and feelings that the client had in the last 2 weeks. Items are rated on a 5-point scale with higher responses corresponding to more frequent experiences of negative behaviors, thoughts, and feelings (e.g., 1= Never, 2= Hardly Ever, 3= Sometimes, 4= Often, and 5= Very Often). Scores can range from 33 to 86 for youths, where a high score represents high severity and a low score indicates low severity. Total scores are calculated by adding the rating and then divide the sum by the number of items to calculate the average score.The SFSS will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers. Outcomes report pre-intervention SFSS score (i.e., first instance of participant completing SFSS prior-to intervention) and 12-month follow-up SFSS score.

Time frame: Monthly from pre-intervention to 12-month follow up

Population: 67 participants total completed the SFSS measure. 2 youth participants and 3 caregiver participants completed the measure at both the pre- and 12-month follow-up timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Training InterventionSymptoms and Functionality Severity Scale (Client Symptomatology & Functioning)Youth Patients, Pre-intervention52.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.47
Training InterventionSymptoms and Functionality Severity Scale (Client Symptomatology & Functioning)Youth Patients, 12-month follow-up46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.14
Training InterventionSymptoms and Functionality Severity Scale (Client Symptomatology & Functioning)Parents of Youth Patients, Pre-intervention44.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.89
Training InterventionSymptoms and Functionality Severity Scale (Client Symptomatology & Functioning)Parents of Youth Patients, 12-month follow-up38.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Secondary

Therapeutic Alliance Quality Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)

The Therapeutic Alliance Quality Scale (TAQS) is a 5-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers to reflect on their last session with their therapist. Items are rated on a 5-point scale with higher responses corresponding to higher quality alliance (e.g., 1= Not at all, 2= Only a little, 3= Somewhat, 4= Quite a bit, and 5= Totally). The TAQS will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers. Outcomes report pre-intervention TAQs score (i.e., first instance of participant completing TAQs prior-to intervention) and 12-month follow-up TAQs score.

Time frame: Weekly from pre-intervention to 12-month follow up

Population: 52 total participants completed the TAQS measure. 3 youth participants completed the measure both at the pre- and 12-month follow-up timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Training InterventionTherapeutic Alliance Quality Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)Youth Patients, Pre-intervention3.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Training InterventionTherapeutic Alliance Quality Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)Youth Patients, 12-month Follow-up3.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Training InterventionTherapeutic Alliance Quality Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)Parents of Youth Patients, Pre-Intervention2.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
Secondary

Treatment Outcomes Expectation Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)

The Treatment Outcomes Expectation Scale (TOES) is a 8-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers about their expectations from counseling. Items are rated on a 3-point scale with higher responses corresponding to more expectations (e.g., 1= I do not expect this, 2= I am not sure, and 3= I do expect this). The TOES will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers.

Time frame: Pre-intervention

Population: 47 participants total completed the TOES measure. 23 youth participants and 24 caregiver participants completed the measure at pre-intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Training InterventionTreatment Outcomes Expectation Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)Youth Patients, Pre-intervention2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Training InterventionTreatment Outcomes Expectation Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)Parents of Youth Patients, Pre-intervention2.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Secondary

Treatment Process Expectations Index (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)

The Treatment Process Expectations Index is a 9-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers about their expectations about counseling. Items are rated on a 3-point scale (e.g., 1= I do not expect this, 2= I am not sure, and 3= I do expect this). There is no right or wrong answer. The reported scores should be interpreted at the item level to identify clinical suggestions for providers based on the clients reported expectations at baseline. The TPEI will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers.

Time frame: Pre-intervention

Population: TPEI items are interpreted at the item level and are not scored together; therefore, outcomes report the number of participants who completed the measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Training InterventionTreatment Process Expectations Index (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)Youth Patients, Pre-intervention23 Participants
Training InterventionTreatment Process Expectations Index (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)Parents of Youth Patients, Pre-intervention24 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026