Skip to content

Cross-sectional Study to Assess Prevalence and Burden of CKD-associated Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients

RELIEF CENSUS-US: Cross-sectional Study to Assess Prevalence and Burden of CKD-associated Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05625542
Acronym
CKD
Enrollment
0
Registered
2022-11-23
Start date
2023-06-10
Completion date
2023-06-30
Last updated
2023-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease-associated Pruritus

Keywords

CKD, CKD-AP, CKD associated pruritus

Brief summary

Vifor International Ltd. is seeking real-world evidence (RWE) to better understand the epidemiology, patient characteristics, and management of CKD-aP in the real-world clinical setting.

Detailed description

CKD-aP is a global clinical problem, and finding effective treatment remains a therapeutic challenge because of its complex pathophysiology (Sommer 2007, Weisshaar 2019, Yosipovitch 2013). The association between CKD-aP and clinical features and laboratory data remains unclear (Davison 2021, Manenti 2021). CKD-aP is thought to be associated with several conditions, including vitamin D deficiency, metabolic abnormalities (e.g., abnormal serum calcium or phosphate levels), toxin build-up, peripheral neuropathy, immune system dysregulation, or opioid receptor dysregulation (Jung 2015, Xie 2021, Kremer 2019, Verduzco 2020, Swarna 2019, Manenti 2021). At present, there is no systematic assessment of CKD-aP in routine clinical practice, and the prevalence of CKD-aP is generally under-reported by patients and therefore underestimated by as much as 69% of healthcare professionals (HCPs) (Rayner 2017). Alleviating the burden of CKD-aP requires proactive identification of patients who suffer from it (Sukul 2020, Davison 2015, Phan 2012).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Vifor (International) Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female adult patients with CKD (≥18 years) receiving HD for at least 3 months prior to signing informed consent * Signed informed consent * Able and willing to fill in questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

* Patients receiving HD at home or both home and site

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence (%) of CKD-aP patients undergoing HD based on the WI-NRS score (past 24 hours).Day 1Ratio between the overall number of patients with WI-NRS scores ranging from 1-10 and the overall number of patients with WI-NRS scores ranging from 0-10, from patients randomly selected to participate in the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence (%) of patients undergoing HD with various CKD-aP severities based on the WI-NRS score (past 24 hours).Day 1none (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10) scores
Current socio-demographic, clinical, and dialysis characteristics as well as current therapeutic landscapeDay 1in the management of CKD-aP
Impact of pruritus severity (WI-NRS)on HRQoL,Day 1as reported by patients
Patient-reported communication with physician and other healthcare provider with respect to pruritus, as well as self-reported anti-itch treatments.Day 1Pruritus and anti-itch
Clinical and healthcare resource outcomes in the last 12 months.Day 1Missed or additional dialysis sessions, Hospitalizations, etc.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026