Respiration and the Airways With Laryngeal Masks
Conditions
Brief summary
Tracheal intubation is considered the gold standard for protecting the airway. As the supraglottic airway devices (SADs) could be inserted without laryngoscopy, so that SADs with different designs and safety issues could be used to manage difficult airways in anesthesia and emergency medicine with continuous patient oxygenation &ventilation, less hemodynamic stress response and less postoperative complications. These advantages encourage the use of a proper SAD as a conduit for endotracheal intubation in stressful conditions. This study will be carried out to compare the Air-QTM Blocker and LarysealTM Pro for blind tracheal intubation during elective ophthalmic surgeries under general anesthesia. Intubation through SAD can be performed using a fiber-optic bronchoscope or blindly. Blind intubation is meaning that the tube is inserted through SAD without direct visualization of the airway. Success rate of blind intubation ranges between 15% and 97%, mostly depending on the type of used SAD, patient characteristics and operator skills. The availability of blind intubation through SAD is important in cases of difficult intubation (either anticipated or unanticipated) especially if fiber-optic is not available, so that SAD will be convenient for untrained personnel.
Detailed description
The laryseal pro could provide rapid and secure airway management and improve patient safety with gastric access reducing the risk of pulmonary aspiration, in addition to speeding up the ETT tube placement with a unique guide system, beside to integrated fenestrated flap that protects from blockage with minimal increase in flow resistance, and elevates the epiglottis for easy, trauma-free ETT tube or bronchoscope insertion. According to the manufacturer: all these features of laryseal pro allow quick easy first time insertion success. As, the laryseal pro is being of shorter breathing tube and smaller cuff in comparison to Air-Q Blocker, so the laryseal pro is expecting to be more amazing than the Air-Q Blocker especially for the new trainers regarding the total insertion time of the endotracheal tube and success rate. Jatin et al. 2021reported that Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway resulted in significantly more success rate and ease of intubation as compared to Ambu Aura Gain. Andrzej et al. 2018 stated that success rate of blind intubation through Air-Q was 75% when compared to 80% in I-gel group. In contrary, there are limited studies available in literature on blind tracheal intubation through the laryseal pro.
Interventions
DEVICEAir-QTM Blocker
The Air-QTM Blocker (Cookgas LLC, Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL, USA) is a SAD that is intended for use as a primary airway seal and an aid for tracheal intubation in situations of anticipated or unanticipated difficult airways. Its design includes a large airway tube inner diameter, a short airway tube length, and a tethered, removable standard 15mm circuit adapter. These features enable direct insertion of larger tracheal tubes up to 7.5 and 8.5mm inner diameters for Air-Q sizes 3.5 and 4.5 respectively (according to body weight; size 3.5: 50-70Kg, size 4.5:70-100Kg). In addition to the soft blocker channel (guide tube) that acts as a conduit for placing medical devices such as NG (Nasogastric) or Blocker tubes. NG tubes are used to decompress and suction the stomach. Standard NG tubes up to 18 Fr. are suitable for all Air-Q Blocker sizes
DEVICELarySealTM Pro
The LarysealTM Pro is the new generation mask for safe and effective airway management, as it could reduce the risk of aspiration by the integrated suction catheter port to allow effective removal of fluids and gastric contents. So that, it could be a promising airway device as its symmetrical cuff and tube contoured to match the oropharyngeal anatomy for quick and easy first time insertion success. It could be applied in both routine and advanced airway management for patients with a higher risk of a difficult airway, unexpected intubation difficulties, beside to airway control during anesthesia. It was presented in the clinical market in: sizes 3, 4 and 5 (according to the body weight; size 3: 30-50Kg, size 4: 50-70 Kg, and size 5:70-100Kg) that can accept larger tracheal tube up to 7.5 and 8mm inner diameter respectively with maximum suction catheter size of 16 Fr. Both devices accommodated standard conventional endotracheal tubes for intubation.
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Age: 18-55 years old. 2. ASA I&II. 3. Both sexes. 4. El-Ganzouri Airway Score \< or =2
Exclusion criteria
1. History of upper respiratory tract infections. 2. History of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or STOP Bang-Score \> 4. 3. Potentially full stomach (trauma, morbid obesity BMI\> 35 Kg/m2, pregnancy, history of gastric regurgitation and heart burn). 4. Esophageal reflux (hiatus hernia). 5. Coagulation disorders.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Total insertion time (seconds) | 200 seconds | Total insertion time (seconds): insertion time (seconds) of the SAD is the time needed for correct SAD placement &started when SAD touched teeth to the first recorded rectangular capnogram curve with satisfactory bilateral chest expansion + insertion time of the endotracheal tube through the SAD (seconds) is the time in seconds from insertion of the endotracheal tube blindly until capnographic confirmation. |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary ContactReham Ali Abdelhaleem Abdelrahman, M.D.
Outcome results
None listed