Cervical Caries
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to clinically evaluate the performance of the bioceramic glass ionomer compared to conventional high viscosity glass ionomer for restoration of carious cervical lesions in geriatric patients over 12 months follow up.
Interventions
OTHERBioceramic glass ionomer restoration
bioactive glass ionomer with unique biocompatibility and biological regenerative properties
OTHERResin modified glass ionomer restoration
A hybrid of glass ionomer and composite resin with acid-base and polymerizable components
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Geriatric patients aged above 55 years * Patients with untreated carious lesions * Patients who have at least 20 teeth under occlusion * Patients with normal occlusion * Vital teeth with carious cervical lesion with asymptomatic vital pulp. * Teeth with no or minimum mobility. * Teeth with normal occlusion. * Teeth with surrounding healthy gingiva and supporting-structures.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who are unable to return for recall appointments * Presence of abnormal oral, medical or mental conditions. * Patients with severe medical diseases. * Patients with xerostomia * Patients with parafunctional habits. * Non vital teeth. * Teeth with signs or symptoms of pulpitis. * Teeth with non carious lesions.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Marginal adaptation score | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months | Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Color match score | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months | Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical) |
| Change in Marginal discoloration score | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months | Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical) |
| Change in Retention score | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months | Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical) |
| Change in Wear score | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months | Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical) |
| Change in Postoperative hypersensitivity score | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months | Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical) |
| Change in Secondary caries score | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months | Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical) |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed