Skip to content

Delphi Study to Identify Crucial Steps and Errors in the Placement of Chest Tubes

Delphi Study to Identif Crucial Steps and Errors in the Placement of Chest Tubes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05623631
Enrollment
29
Registered
2022-11-21
Start date
2021-03-30
Completion date
2021-09-28
Last updated
2022-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thoracic Injury

Keywords

Assessment, Chest Tube Insertion, Rating Scale

Brief summary

The goal of this Delphi study is to identify the crucial steps and the errors in Chest Tube Insertion (CTI). These steps and errors will be used for the development of a new assessment tool based on international consensus.

Interventions

OTHERSurvey

Surveys were distributed using REDCap, and participants were asked to complete these within 5 weeks of receiving the invitation.

Sponsors

University Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Must be experts in their respective fields. * Must hold a degree of Master in Medicine * Must have finished the residency training specific to their field (be an attending physician) * Must have 5 years post-residency experience * Must have performed at least 50 CTIs independently in their career * Must have an interest in educating and guiding junior residents in their training.

Exclusion criteria

* Insufficient experience in CTI * Insufficient experience as an attending physician

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Steps and errors presented in round 1one yearThe number of experts who propose a certain step or error
Number of steps and errors passing round 2one yearThe number of experts who agree on the inclusion of each step or error in the assessment tool on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree - Disagree - Neutral - Agree - Strongly Agree).
Inclusion of steps with their descriptive anchorsone yearThe number of experts who agree on the inclusion of each step with their descriptive anchors in the assessment tool on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree - Disagree - Neutral - Agree - Strongly Agree).

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026