Skip to content

The Effectiveness and Efficacy of the Combination of the Integrated Psychological Therapy and Metacognitive Training.

The Effectiveness and Efficacy of the Combination of the Integrated Psychological Therapy and Metacognitive Training in Schizophrenia and Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia. This is a Non-randomized Trial. The Therapy Lasts 60 Sessions.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05623228
Acronym
ATHSCHIZ
Enrollment
35
Registered
2022-11-21
Start date
2022-11-01
Completion date
2024-03-26
Last updated
2025-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Keywords

Schizophrenia, treatment resistant schizophrenia, recovery

Brief summary

The combination of the Integrated Psychological Therapy and Metacognitive Training in individuals with schizophrenia and treatment resistant schizophrenia. Is it effective and efficacious?

Detailed description

Individuals with schizophrenia and treatment resistant schizophrenia will participate on a group cognitive behavioral therapy and rehabilitation, in which Integrated Psychological Therapy and Metacognitive Training are going to be implemented. The therapy will last 60 biweekly sessions. This is a non randomized trial. Speed of processing, working memory, verbal memory, visual memory, reasoning and problem solving, social cognition, symptoms, functional outcome and recovery will be evaluated before, after therapy and in a 6 months follow up. MCCB, Social Perception Scale, the Greek Test for verbal memory, PANSS, WHO DAS 2. 0 (Greek), PSYRAT and the Recovery Assessment Scale will be used ih this study.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTThe combination of the Integrated Psychological Therapy and Metacognitive Training in individuals with schizophrenia and treatment resistant schizophrenia

The combination of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in individuals with schizophrenia and treatment resistant schizophrenia.

Sponsors

Rakitzi, Stavroula
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Pharmacotherapy in combination with the Integrated Psychological Therapy and Metacognitive Training will be implemented

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of schizophrenia * No relapse and hospitalization * Ambulant psychiatric treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Other psychotic disorders * Relapse and hospitalization * Substance abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive Functions: Matrics Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), Greek Verbal TestBaseline T1 (preintervention)-follow-up T3 (after 6 months, up to 55 weeks)Greek verbal memory test: (verbal memory semantic condition (average) (minimum 0-maximum 40) (high scores better outcomes) MCCB: (Neuropsychological Assessment Battery) (NAB) (reasoning and problem solving): (minimum 0 maximum 26) (high scores better outcomes) Data is analyzed through SPS 13.
Symptoms, PANSS Greek VersionBaseline T1 (preintervention)-follow-up T3 (after 6 months, up to 55 weeks)(PANSS) Greek Version Positive symptoms (minimum 8 maximum 49) low scores better outcomes Negative symptoms: (minimum 8 maximum 49) low scores better outcomes General Psychopathology: (minimum 17 maximum 112) low scores better outcomes Total: Sum of positive, negative and general symptoms (minimum 31, maximum 210), low scores better outcomes The total score is used in the statistical analysis (PSYRAT) Auditory hallucinations (minimum 0 maximum 44) low scores better Delusion (minimum 0 maximum 24) low scores better Data is analyzed with SPSS 13
Functional OutcomeBaseline T1 (preintervention)-follow-up T3 (after 6 months, up to 55 weeks)WHO DAS 2.0 WHODAS total: (functional outcome) (minimum 0-maximum 100) low scores better outcomes Data are analyzed with SPSS 13
RecoveryBaseline T1 (preintervention)-follow-up T3 (after 6 months, up to 55 weeks)RAS-DS scale Total score (sum of the scores) (0-152) high scores are better outcomes Data is analyzed through SPSS 13

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intelligent QuotientBaseline T1 (preintervention)Intelligence, high scores are better Data is analyzed through SPSS 13.

Countries

Greece

Participant flow

Recruitment details

November 2022-Januar 2023 Patients were recruited from our private practice Dr. Stavroula Rakitzi Dr. Polyxeni Georgila

Pre-assignment details

35 patients with schizophrenia started

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Therapy Group All Participants (Groups A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H)
Pharmacotherapy in combination with the Integrated Psychological Therapy and Metacognitive Training will be implemented. 35 individuals with schizophrenia The combination of the Integrated Psychological Therapy and Metacognitive Training in individuals with schizophrenia and treatment resistant schizophrenia: The combination of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in individuals with schizophrenia and treatment resistant schizophrenia. The Groups A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H have been added to one group. They receive the same intervention.
35
Total35

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
T1-T2 (11-2022-6 2023, 1 2023- 8 2023)Anxiety10000000
T1-T3 (11-2022-1-2024; 1 2023-3 2024)Anxiety10110000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTherapy Group All Participants (Groups A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H)
Age, Customized31.02 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.04
Race/Ethnicity, Customized35 Greek patients
Region of Enrollment
Greece
35 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants
WAIS, IQ86.17 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.92

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50 / 20 / 80 / 80 / 30 / 30 / 30 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 50 / 20 / 80 / 80 / 30 / 30 / 30 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 20 / 80 / 80 / 30 / 30 / 30 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Cognitive Functions: Matrics Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), Greek Verbal Test

Greek verbal memory test: (verbal memory semantic condition (average) (minimum 0-maximum 40) (high scores better outcomes) MCCB: (Neuropsychological Assessment Battery) (NAB) (reasoning and problem solving): (minimum 0 maximum 26) (high scores better outcomes) Data is analyzed through SPS 13.

Time frame: Baseline T1 (preintervention)-follow-up T3 (after 6 months, up to 55 weeks)

Population: All participants in T1, T3. All participants participate in the same therapy

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Therapy Group All ParticipantsCognitive Functions: Matrics Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), Greek Verbal TestVerbal memory T112.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
Therapy Group All ParticipantsCognitive Functions: Matrics Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), Greek Verbal TestVerbal memory T319.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Therapy Group All ParticipantsCognitive Functions: Matrics Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), Greek Verbal TestProblem-solving (NAB) T17.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Therapy Group All ParticipantsCognitive Functions: Matrics Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), Greek Verbal TestProblem-solving (NAB) T314.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
p-value: 0ANOVA
p-value: 0ANOVA
Primary

Functional Outcome

WHO DAS 2.0 WHODAS total: (functional outcome) (minimum 0-maximum 100) low scores better outcomes Data are analyzed with SPSS 13

Time frame: Baseline T1 (preintervention)-follow-up T3 (after 6 months, up to 55 weeks)

Population: All participants in T1, T3. All participants participate in the same therapy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Therapy Group All ParticipantsFunctional OutcomeWHODAStotal T133.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.55
Therapy Group All ParticipantsFunctional OutcomeWHODAStotal T330.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.78
p-value: 0ANOVA
Primary

Recovery

RAS-DS scale Total score (sum of the scores) (0-152) high scores are better outcomes Data is analyzed through SPSS 13

Time frame: Baseline T1 (preintervention)-follow-up T3 (after 6 months, up to 55 weeks)

Population: All participants in T1, T3. All participants participate in the same therapy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Therapy Group All ParticipantsRecoveryRECOVERY total T190.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.49
Therapy Group All ParticipantsRecoveryRCOVERY total T3125.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.12
p-value: 0.04ANOVA
Primary

Symptoms, PANSS Greek Version

(PANSS) Greek Version Positive symptoms (minimum 8 maximum 49) low scores better outcomes Negative symptoms: (minimum 8 maximum 49) low scores better outcomes General Psychopathology: (minimum 17 maximum 112) low scores better outcomes Total: Sum of positive, negative and general symptoms (minimum 31, maximum 210), low scores better outcomes The total score is used in the statistical analysis (PSYRAT) Auditory hallucinations (minimum 0 maximum 44) low scores better Delusion (minimum 0 maximum 24) low scores better Data is analyzed with SPSS 13

Time frame: Baseline T1 (preintervention)-follow-up T3 (after 6 months, up to 55 weeks)

Population: Evaluation of T1, T3. All participants participate in the same therapy

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Therapy Group All ParticipantsSymptoms, PANSS Greek VersionPANSStotal T1113.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.49
Therapy Group All ParticipantsSymptoms, PANSS Greek VersionPANSStotal T370.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.67
p-value: 0.04ANOVA
Secondary

Intelligent Quotient

Intelligence, high scores are better Data is analyzed through SPSS 13.

Time frame: Baseline T1 (preintervention)

Population: Pre-intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Therapy Group All ParticipantsIntelligent Quotient86.17 score on a scale IQStandard Deviation 3.92
p-value: 0t-test, 1 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026