Skip to content

Clinical Outcomes and Equality in Healthcare for Emergency General Surgery Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy

Improvement in Patient Survival and Equality in Care Provision for General Surgery Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy - Can This be Achieved Through the Implementation of Standardised Care Protocols?

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05623176
Acronym
LAPTOP
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2022-11-21
Start date
2015-01-01
Completion date
2030-12-31
Last updated
2024-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abdomen, Acute

Keywords

Emergency laparotomy, General surgery, Clinical outcomes

Brief summary

The goal of this observational cohort study is to evaluate the standard of care for general surgerical patients undergoing emergency laparotomy and assess factors affecting clinical outcomes, as well as evaluating the quality of life in the year after abdominal surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. what factors are associated with adverse post-operative events 2. are patients treated differently based on sex or age 3. how does quality of life look like and possibly change over the coarse of a year after surgery This is an evaluation of the current standard of care and the outcomes of this patient group prior to the implementation of a standardised care protocols for emergency laparotomy patients. Secondly, the study aims to, over time, compare results before and after the introduction of this standardised care protocol.

Interventions

OTHERStandardised laparotomy care

This is a cohort study and no intervention as part of the study has been introduced. We are studying two groups and comparing the two before and after the introduction of a standardised laparotomy care protocol as part of a clinical quality improvement measure.

Sponsors

Region Stockholm
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Undergoing emergency laparotomy due to general surgical indication

Exclusion criteria

* Children under 16 * Trauma laparotomy * Vascular, urological or gynaecological indication for laparotomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
In-hospital mortality30 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In-hospital serious complications30 daysSeverity measured through Clavien-Dindo classification
Long-term mortality1 year
Quality of life questionnaires1 yearAs measured through questionnaires at 1 month, 3 months and up to 1 year post-operatively.

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

Primary ContactRebecka Ahl Hulme, MD PhD
rebecka.ahl-hulme@regionstockholm.se0046812373212

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026