Skip to content

Attention Training Technique in Treatment of Anxiety and Depression in Coronary Heart Disease Patients

Attention Training Technique in Treatment of Anxiety and Depression in Coronary Heart Disease Patients -a Randomized Controlled Trial With 6 Months Follow-up

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05621408
Enrollment
64
Registered
2022-11-18
Start date
2022-11-30
Completion date
2024-12-20
Last updated
2024-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Depression, Anxiety

Brief summary

Anxiety and depression are associated with work disability, lower participation rate in cardiac rehabilitation and unfavourable life style changes following a coronary heart disease (CHD) event. The prevalence of clinically significant symptoms of depression and anxiety in CHD patients has been estimated to 30-50%. Furthermore, depression and anxiety are associated with a significant increased risk of subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in CHD patients. Psychological interventions for anxiety and depression in CHD patients have demonstrated small and uncertain effects of symptoms, and no effect on cardiovascular outcomes. Therefore, testing the effectiveness of specific psychological interventions that may affect central mechanisms for cardiovascular outcomes, has been requested. The Attention training (ATT) Study is a randomized controlled trial comparing group-attention training to wait-list control in 64 patients who experience significant anxiety and depression after a CHD event. It will also be explored whether reduction in psychological symptoms is correlated with changes in biological markers with a potential link to cardiovascular outcomes.

Interventions

Attention Training Technique is a six weeks psychological intervention provided by trained professionals

Sponsors

Oslo University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Oslo
CollaboratorOTHER
The Hospital of Vestfold
CollaboratorOTHER
Vestre Viken Hospital Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Established coronary heart disease as main somatic disease * \>=8 on either HADS-anxiety or depression subscale * Age 18 - 65 years * The ability to understand and speak Norwegian language, * Willingness and ability to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Current or past neurological illness * Traumatic brain injury * Current alcohol and/or substance dependency disorders * Psychotic disorders * Bipolar disorders * Developmental disorders * Mental retardation * Cognitive impairment which precludes informed consent/ability to participate * Acute suicidality * Life-expectancy less than 12 months * Concurrent psychological intervention for emotional distress * Antidepressant or anxiolytic medication initiated during previous 8 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Hospital Anxiety and Depression -anxiety subscale score and Hospital Anxiety and Depression -depression subscale scoreUp to six weeks and six months after randomizationChanges in Hospital Anxiety and Depression -anxiety subscale score and Hospital Anxiety and Depression -depression subscale scores within and between the two treatment arms. Scores range 0-21, higher scores indicate more symptoms
Differences in proportion with Hospital Anxiety and Depression -anxiety and Hospital Anxiety and Depression-depression subscale scores <8Up to six weeks and six months after randomizationDifferences in proportion with Hospital Anxiety and Depression -anxiety subscale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression -depression subscale scores \<8 within and between the two treatment arms. Scores \>=8 indicate signicant symptoms

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Positive Beliefs about Rumination Scale scoresUp to six weeks and six months after randomizationChanges in Positive Beliefs about Rumination scores assessed by the Positive Beliefs about Rumination Questionnaire within and between the two treatment arms. Scores range 9-36, higher scores indicate stronger beliefs
Changes in Negative Beliefs about Rumination Scale scoresUp to six weeks and six months after randomizationChanges in Negative Beliefs about Rumination scores assessed by the Negative Beliefs about Rumination Questionnaire within and between the two treatment arms. Scores range 13-52, higher scores indicate stronger beliefs
Changes in Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 scoresUp to six weeks and six months after randomizationChanges in Metacognitions assessed by the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 within and between the two treatment arms. Scores range 0-21, higher scores indicate more symptoms . Scores range 30-120, higher scores indicate stronger beliefs
Changes in rumination scoresUp to six weeks and six months after randomizationChanges in rumination scores assessed by the Ruminative Response scale within and between the two treatment arms. Scores range from 22-88, higher scores indicate more symptoms
Changes in quality of lifeUp to six weeks and six months after randomizationChanges in quality of life assessed by the Short Form (SF) 12 within and between the two treatment arms. Scores range 1-100, lower scores indicate lower quality of life
Changes in Bergen Insomnia Scale scoresUp to six weeks and six months after randomizationChanges in Bergen Insomnia Scale scores assessed by the Bergen Insomnia Scale within and between the two treatment arms. Scores range 0-42, higher scores indicate more symptoms
Changes in C-reactive Protein (CRP)Up to six weeks and six months after randomizationChanges in C-reactive Protein (CRP) measured in blood within and between the two treatment arms. Values range 0 to \>20, higher values indicate more subclinical inflammation
Changes in type d personality and its traits negative affectivity and social inhibitionUp to six weeks and six months after randomizationChanges in type d personality and its traits negative affectivity and social inhibition assessed by the Distressed Scale (DS)-14 within and between the two treatment arms. Scores range 0-28, higher scores indicate more symptoms
Changes in worry scoresUp to six weeks and six months after randomizationChanges in worry scores assessed by the Penn State Worry Questionnaire within and between the two treatment arms. Scores range 16-80, higher scores indicate more symptoms

Countries

Norway

Contacts

Primary ContactJohn Munkhaugen, MD,PhD
johmun@vestreviken.no+4797524194
Backup ContactToril Dammen, MD,PhD
toril.dammen@medisin.uio.no+4790163433

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026