Skip to content

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) in Patients With Ataxia

Interventional Cross-over Study to Evaluate the Efficacy on Motor and Cognitive Performance of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) in Patients With Neurodegenerative Ataxia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05621200
Acronym
SCAtACS
Enrollment
26
Registered
2022-11-17
Start date
2021-01-28
Completion date
2022-12-10
Last updated
2022-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ataxia, Ataxia With Oculomotor Apraxia, CANVAS, Multiple System Atrophy, Spinocerebellar Ataxias

Keywords

transcranial direct current stimulation, transcranial alternate current stimulation, spinocerebellar ataxia, cerebellar ataxia

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effects on motor and cognitive performance of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) compared to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and placebo stimulation (sham) in patients with neurodegenerative ataxia to identify a possible rehabilitation protocol.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial stimulation over the cerebellar hemispheres

Single session of Transcranial stimulation over the cerebellar hemispheres

Sponsors

Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a cerebellar syndrome and quantifiable cerebellar atrophy

Exclusion criteria

* Severe head trauma in the past * History of seizures * History of ischemic stroke or hemorrhage * Pacemaker * Metal implants in the head/neck region * Severe comorbidity * Intake of illegal drugs * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Score From BaselineBaseline (immediately before the intervention) - Immediately after the interventionInternational Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS): semi-quantitative 100-point scale, yielding a total score of 0 (no ataxia) to 100 (most severe ataxia).
Change in the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) Score From BaselineBaseline (immediately before the intervention) - Immediately after the interventionScale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA): 8-item performance based scale, yielding a total score of 0 (no ataxia) to 40 (most severe ataxia).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Cerebellar Brain Inhibition (CBI) Measurements From BaselineBaseline (immediately before the intervention) - Immediately after the interventionCerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) is expressed as motor evoked potential amplitude (average of 10 recordings). Lower values reflect higher inhibition and thus reduced impairment.
Change in Timed Up and Go Test Duration From BaselineBaseline (immediately before the intervention) - Immediately after the interventionTime (in seconds) that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around 180 degrees, walk back to the chair, and sit down while turning 180 degrees, assessed with gait sensors.
Change in Walking Cadence From BaselineBaseline (immediately before the intervention) - Immediately after the interventionAverage Left and Right Steps/Minute during a 60 seconds walk, assessed with gait sensors.
Change in 360° Turn From BaselineBaseline (immediately before the intervention) - Immediately after the interventionVelocity (Number of Degrees/sec) in making a 360° turn, assessed with gait sensors

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026