Bone Loss, Dental Implant
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of this study will be to compare the amount of marginal bone height changes between immediate and delayed loading for immediately inserted implants used as abutments of mandibular overdenture.
Interventions
OTHERImmediate loading of the implants
Patients of this group will be rehabilitated by implant-retained mandibular overdenture with immediate loading of the implants as opposed to conventional maxillary complete dentures.
OTHERDelayed loading of the implant
Patients of this group will be rehabilitated by implant retained mandibular overdenture with delayed loading of the implants (after 3 months) opposed by conventional maxillary complete dentures
Sponsors
Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patient having two standing mandibular canines with compromised prognosis (which indicted for extraction, without any preapical lesions nor acute infection) and have an adequate labial bone thickness. * Patient having opposing completely edenteolous maxilla. * Patients having normal maxilla-mandibular relationship and sufficient inter arch distance was insured by through tentative jaw relation record. * Patients with good oral hygiene. * Enough bone volume for implants in the interforaminal region (adequate bone quality and quantity)
Exclusion criteria
* Mental disorder patients who are not capable of making a decision or narcotic drug addicts. * Patients with Tempro-Mandibular Joint disorders * Patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy * Patients with systemic diseases affecting bone metabolism * Uncooperative patients who have no understanding of the need of a regular follow-up. * Patient with pathological defects in the areas of implant insertion. * Vulnerable group as prisoners, mentally retarded patients.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in bone loss | at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months | Every 3 months all patients were recalled for assessment of marginal bone loss. The assessment was done using digital periapical radiograph Ezsensor (Vatech intraoral radiographic sensor, Vatech, South Korea) and the technique of radiograph was paralleling technique using sensor holder (TROLLBYTE PLUS, TROLLDENTAL, UK) to ensure same position of cone through subsequent follow-up exposures |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed