Skip to content

Gene Expression Study Between Two Dermal Injectables Hydroxylapatite Semi-permanent Filler

A Randomized, Single-center, Prospective Biopsy Study Comparing a Poly L-lactic Acid Biostimulator and a Calcium Hydroxylapatite Semi-permanent Filler

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05620043
Acronym
Sculptra
Enrollment
21
Registered
2022-11-17
Start date
2022-09-28
Completion date
2023-11-06
Last updated
2024-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gene Expression

Brief summary

To compare gene expression stimulated by a semi-permanent filler and a biostimulator via punch biopsy

Detailed description

This is a randomized, single-center, comparative study to evaluate gene expression after treatment with a semi-permanent filler or a biostimulator. This study is designed to enroll and randomize approximately 20 subjects in a 1:1 ratio of treatment to PLLA or CaHA. All randomized subjects are to have contour deficiency at the nasolabial folds. Eligible subjects randomized to receive punch biopsy followed by treatment injection by the Treating Investigator at baseline. The method of injection was at the discretion of the Treating Investigator. A sufficient amount of product is injected to achieve optimal correction of the nasolabial folds, in the opinion of the Treating Investigator. PLLA group receives a second treatment at week 4 while CaHA group receives an optional touch-up if needed. All subjects have final follow-up visit for a second punch biopsy on the other side of the nasolabial fold.

Interventions

DEVICESculptra

Biostimulator

DEVICERadiesse Plus

Semi-permanent filler

Sponsors

Galderma R&D
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Randomized, single-center, comparative study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subject with a minimum of shallow nasolabial fold (NLF) contour deficiencies as assessed via the wrinkle assessment scale * Subject with identical WAS scores on both NLFs * Ability of giving consent for participation in the study * Agreement to have skin biopsies on NLFs

Exclusion criteria

* Significant NLF asymmetry, or different WAS score on each NLF * Pregnant, planning pregnancy during the course of the study or breastfeeding * History of allergy or hypersensitivity to any ingredient of the treatment products * History of allergy or hypersensitivity to anesthetics or lidocaine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analyze gene expression via punch biopsy12 weeks after baselineSummary of fold change using by relative quantification method at week 12. Gene expression analysis is performed via qPCR processing using a panel of biomarkers related to scar tissue formation, collagen, elastin, extracellular matrix integrity, epidermal barrier, anti-aging, antioxidant, cell renewal/regeneration, inflammation, growth factor, and hydration among others.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate volume change in the treated area using 3D imaging4 and 12 weeks after baselineSummary of total volume change in the nasolabial fold area measured by 3D photography at each visit. Total volume change corresponds to net volume change from baseline in the nasolabial fold.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026