Skip to content

Loneliness Group Intervention

Loneliness Group Intervention for Geriatric Psychiatry Inpatients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05619718
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-11-17
Start date
2024-02-23
Completion date
2027-09-30
Last updated
2025-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Loneliness

Keywords

loneliness, geriatric, functional analytic psychotherapy

Brief summary

The goal of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a group loneliness intervention in geriatric psychiatry inpatients. This type of group loneliness intervention is based on functional analytic psychotherapy and is called Awareness, Courage, and Love Groups.

Detailed description

The objective of our clinical trial is to adapt, implement, and evaluate a type of loneliness group intervention called Awareness, Courage, and Love Groups for older adults in a psychiatric unit. The following research questions will be answered: (a) Are ACL groups with geriatric psychiatry inpatients feasible and acceptable? (b) Do such ACL groups demonstrate preliminary efficacy?

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAwareness, Courage, and Love Groups

Groups based on the Awareness, Courage, and Love framework from functional analytic psychotherapy

OTHERMutual Help Meetings

Groups based on treatment as usual where patients gather to discuss how they can help others on the ward, and make requests for how others can help them.

Sponsors

Western University, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Admission to geriatric psychiatry inpatient unit

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals who are disoriented to person, delirious, unable to tolerate or participate meaningfully in the group, or otherwise unable to provide consent to research and psychotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale (IOS)Up to 2 monthsBrief single-item pictorial measure of social closeness. The minimum value is 1, the maximum value is 7, and higher scores indicate a better outcome.
UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-6)Up to 2 monthsBrief measure of loneliness. The minimum value is 6, the maximum value is 24, and higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Relational Health Indices (RHI)Up to 2 monthsBrief measure of group relational health. The minimum value is 8, the maximum value is 40, and higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Quantitative Program SatisfactionUp to 2 monthsBrief measure of program satisfaction. The minimum value is 0, the maximum value is 16, and higher scores indicate a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving ScaleUp to 2 months1 item pictorial scale of subjective wellbeing from 0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Sacred Moment Qualities (SMQ)Up to 2 monthsBrief measure of perceived sacred qualities, adapted from Pargament et al. (2014). The minimum value is 11, the maximum value is 55, and higher scores indicate a better outcome.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfaction QuestionnaireUp to 2 monthsBrief open-ended questions about program satisfaction. Responses are qualitative.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026