Skip to content

Emergency Preparedness for Caregivers of Persons With Dementia: Disaster PrepWise

Emergency Preparedness and Support for Caregivers of Persons With Dementia: Disaster PrepWise

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05619263
Acronym
DPW-Caregiver
Enrollment
250
Registered
2022-11-16
Start date
2023-07-12
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2026-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caregiver Resilience and Stress

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease, Dementia, Caregiver, Disaster preparedness

Brief summary

Individuals with dementia and their families are especially vulnerable during a disaster as it limits caregivers' ability to continue with care due to disaster related stress and reduced access to resources and support. The COVID-19 pandemic showed the extreme vulnerability of persons with dementia (PWD) and their caregivers as they struggled to access support and resources due to the threat of COVID-19 infection; such impact was exacerbated in rural areas where caregivers are geographically isolated and disaster management resources are scarce. With the number of federally declared disasters increasing dramatically over the past 50 years, active public health efforts are needed to support caregivers in developing emergency caregiving plans usable in disasters such as pandemics and extreme weather emergencies. The long-term goal of this project is to enhance emergency preparedness and support networks of caregivers of PWD to increase their resilience and minimize distress by implementing an intervention program, Disaster PrepWise (DPW). In the DPW program, a trained Medical Reserve Corp (MRC) volunteer will provide step-by-step guidance to caregivers to jointly develop emergency preparedness plans and personal support networks. The objectives of this proposed study are to 1) test the impact of DPW on caregiver outcomes (i.e., resilience, stress) and perceptions that may mediate the association between DPW and outcomes (caregiver self-efficacy, preparedness, social support); and 2) evaluate implementation strategies in a real-world setting to optimize future dissemination. We will conduct a randomized control trial of 250 caregivers of persons with dementia involving two arms: DPW intervention group and an information-only control group (print information on disaster preparedness). Assessments will occur before randomization (baseline), and 3 and 6 months after the baseline. This study is innovative in its use of a highly personalized disaster preparedness program with built-in assistance to support caregivers; the support will be provided through an existing national-level public health infrastructure (MRC) that has a great potential to reach older adults and caregivers in rural areas. The knowledge and data obtained through this study will lay the foundation for a future larger-scale multi-state pragmatic trial to assess dissemination potentials.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDisaster PrepWise-Caregiver

The Disaster PrepWise (DPW) intervention consists of five interactive modules and two supplemental sections (special topics and resources on various types of disasters). The five modules are: (1) Complete a Personal \& Household Assessment, (2) Develop a Personal Emergency Network, (3) Develop Emergency Information \& Gather Important Documents, (4) Keep a 3-5 Day Supply of Medications \& Medical Supplies, and (5) Build an Emergency Supply Kit. Through an initial visit (IV1) and a follow-up phone conversation 4 weeks later (IV2), the interventionist will develop a personalized disaster management plan and provide it to the participant for sharing with family and friends. Eight weeks after the initial session, the interventionist will make a final follow-up call (IV3) to provide any additional assistance caregivers may need.

Sponsors

Sato Ashida
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* English speaking adults (18 years and older) * Family members (e.g., biological and non-biological relatives, friends) of individuals diagnosed with ADRD regardless of whether they live with the individual or not. Individuals will not be excluded based on race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation.

Exclusion criteria

* Families of those diagnosed as predementia or mild cognitive impairment are excluded from the parent study due to differing care needs. * DPW addresses the needs of community-dwelling individuals, thus, caregivers of those living in nursing homes facilities will be excluded. * Caregivers with physical or cognitive conditions that prevent them from consenting or providing responses to questions will be excluded following evaluation ("Evaluation to Sign an Informed Consent Document for Research," UI IRB).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ResilienceChange between baseline and 6-month follow-upConnor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC: 25 items). The range is 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher resilience.
Caregiver stressChange between baseline and 6-month follow-upCohen Perceived Stress Scale (PSS: 14 items). The range is 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate higher perceived stress.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-EfficacyChange between baseline and 6-month follow-upCaregiver Self-Efficacy (SE to manage care, 5 items; SE to use services, 4 items). The range is 0-10. A higher score indicates a higher amount of self-efficacy.
Caregiver PreparednessChange between baseline and 6-month follow-upCaregiver Preparedness scale (8 items). The range is 0 to 40. A higher score indicates that the caregiver feels more prepared for caregiving.
Social NetworksChange between baseline and 6-month follow-upCaREnet: Caregiver Social Network Assessment tool. It is not a scale score. Counts of network members engaging in supportive interactions.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSato Ashida, PhD

University of Iowa

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 22, 2026