Skip to content

Clinical Outcomes of Indocyanine Green Tracer Using in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy With Lymph Node Dissection for Remnant Gastric Cancer

Clinical Outcomes of Indocyanine Green Tracer Using in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy With Lymph Node Dissection for Remnant Gastric Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05618821
Enrollment
68
Registered
2022-11-16
Start date
2022-06-03
Completion date
2028-04-01
Last updated
2022-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric Cancer

Keywords

Indocyanine Green Tracer, Laparoscopic Gastrectomy, Remnant Gastric Cancer

Brief summary

Patients with resectable remnant gastric cancer were selected as study subjects to investigate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of ICG near-infrared imaging tracing in guiding laparoscopic lymph node dissection for remnant gastric cancer by comparing injection ICG group and non-injection ICG group.

Detailed description

Indocyanine Green Tracer is often applied in surgery for gastric cancer. Its application in laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for remnant gastric cancer is at the stage of cases accumulation, method studying and clinical research. There is no prospective studies to identify the clinical outcomes of Indocyanine Green Tracer using in laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for remnant gastric cancer. On the basis of more than 300 cases of laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for remnant gastric cancer, we want to apply the Indocyanine Green Tracer, a cheap, easy to operate and no radiation pollution way, to predict the positive lymph nodes in remnant gastric cancer, to guid the scope of laparoscopic lymph node dissection for remnant gastric cancer.

Interventions

Laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for remnant gastric cancer using Indocyanine Green Tracer

Sponsors

Fujian Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age from 18 to 75 years 2. Remnant gastric cancer (cT1-4a, N-/+, M0 at preoperative evaluation according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual Seventh Edition) (4) No distant metastasis, no direct invasion of pancreas, spleen or other organs nearby in the preoperative examinations (5) Performance status of 0 or 1 on the ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale (6) ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) class I to III (7) Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Women during pregnancy or breast-feeding 2. Severe mental disorder 3. History of previous upper abdominal surgery (except for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gastrectomy) 4. History of previous gastric surgery (including ESD/EMR for gastric cancer) 5. Rejection of laparoscopic resection 6. History of allergy to iodine agents 7. Enlarged or bulky regional lymph node diameter over 3cm by preoperative imaging 8. History of other malignant disease within past five years 9. History of previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy 10. History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past six months 11. History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within past six months 12. History of continuous systematic administration of corticosteroids within one month 13. Requirement of simultaneous surgery for another disease 14. Emergency surgery due to complications (bleeding, obstruction or perforation) caused by gastric cancer 15. FEV1\<50% of the predicted values 16. Linitis plastica, Widespread

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes30 daysTotal Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in the ICG group and total number of lymph nodes in the ICG group30 daysRelationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in the ICG group and total number of lymph nodes in the ICG group
Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in the ICG group and positive lymph nodes in the ICG group (positive rate)30 daysRelationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in the ICG group and positive lymph nodes in the ICG group (positive rate)
Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in the ICG group and negative lymph nodes in the ICG group (false positive rate)30 daysRelationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in the ICG group and negative lymph nodes in the ICG group (false positive rate)
Relationship between non-fluorescent lymph nodes in the ICG group and negative lymph nodes in the ICG group (negative rate)30 daysRelationship between non-fluorescent lymph nodes in the ICG group and negative lymph nodes in the ICG group (negative rate)
Number of Metastasis Lymph Nodes30 daysNumber of Metastasis Lymph Nodes
Metastasis rate of lymph node30 daysMetastasis rate of lymph node
Lymph node noncompliance rate30 daysLymph node noncompliance rate
Postoperative mortality rate30 daysPostoperative mortality rate
3-year overall survival rate3 years3-year overall survival rate
3-year disease-free survival rate3 years3-year disease-free survival rate
3-year recurrence pattern3 years3-year recurrence pattern
Postoperative recovery course30 daysTime to first ambulation, flatus, liquid diet and soft diet, and postoperative hospital stay
Intraoperative situation30 daysOperation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative morbidity rate
Postoperative morbidity rate30 daysPostoperative morbidity rate

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactHualong Zheng
291167038@qq.com+8618359190587

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026