Skip to content

Laser Versus Cryotherapy for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Warts

Laser Versus Cryotherapy for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Warts: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05616078
Enrollment
110
Registered
2022-11-15
Start date
2022-11-30
Completion date
2025-11-30
Last updated
2022-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Warts

Brief summary

To evaluate whether laser was superior to cryotherapy for recalcitrant warts

Detailed description

Patients with recalcitrant warts were randomized equally to receive laser or cryotherapy every 3 to 4 weeks, for a maximum of 4 sessions.The primary outcomes were the cure rate at 16 weeks; secondary outcomes included time to clearance of warts, patient satisfaction with the treatment and treatment-related adverse effects.

Interventions

OTHERlaser treatment

a maximum of 4 sessions, with an interval of 3 to 4 weeks

OTHERcryotherapy

a maximum of 4 sessions, with an interval of 3 to 4 weeks

Sponsors

The 306 Hospital of People's Liberation Army
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with HPV2/27/57-induced recalcitrant warts, including periungualor mosaic warts, common or plantar warts with a duration of longer than 1 year, and common or plantar warts previously received no more than two sessions of cryotherapy * Total number of warts is ≤10 . * Aged 18 years or older.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients are currently participating in another trial for the treatment of cutaneous warts. * Patients have taken immunosuppressant drugs (such as oral corticosteroids) during the past three months. * Patients have impaired healing eg due to diabetes, vitamin A deficiency, hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. * Patients have autoimmune diseases (such as systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, scleroderma or other diseases). * Patients are pregnant or ready for pregnancies or breast-feeding. * Patients have cold intolerance (such as cold urticaria, cryoglobulinaemia, cold agglutinin syndrome or Raynaud's syndrome). * Patients have local pain intolerance. * Patients have local hypoesthesia. * Patients are unable to tolerate laser or cryotherapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cure rate at 16 weeks16 weeks since the initial treatmentA patient was considered to be cured if all warts were no longer visible and could not be palpated anymore.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time to clearance of warts16 weeks since the initial treatmentThe time from treatment initiation until clearance of all warts
patient satisfaction with the treatment16 weeks since the initial treatmentPatient satisfaction was rated on a 5-point scale (from very happy to very unhappy)
treatment-related adverse events16 weeks since the initial treatmentSome adverse effects, including pain, swelling, blisters, hemorrhagic bullae, bruising, and skin breakdown, were recorded by the patients, whereas others, including secondary bacterial infection, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, and scarring were evaluated by a dermatologist

Contacts

Primary ContactShichao Lu, MD
lvshichao@sina.com8610-010-66356984

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026