Skip to content

Meru Health Program to Treat Depression in Primary Care

Hybrid Type-1 Effectiveness-implementation Trial for Primary Care Depression Screening and Referral to a Remote Digital Mental Health Clinic

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05615662
Enrollment
0
Registered
2022-11-14
Start date
2022-12-01
Completion date
2023-05-18
Last updated
2023-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety, Depression

Keywords

Mental Health, Digital Mental Health, Depression, Anxiety, Meru Health

Brief summary

Meru Health Inc. seeks to further validate the Meru Health Program (MHP) as a single solution to screening, referral, and treatment in primary care as compared to treatment as usual using a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) study design. The goal of this study is to determine the feasibility, effectiveness, and implementability of this digital mental health (DMH) solution. If proven effective and implementable, more widely integrating the MHP into primary care has the potential to improve the systems of screening, referral, and treatment for depression nationwide. This, in turn, will serve as a solution to improve access to effective care for the millions of Americans currently suffering from depression, ultimately reducing its public health burden.

Detailed description

The goal of this study is to test the MHP as a 'package solution' of screening and treatment in a primary care setting through a 2-step clinical trial process: (1) A smaller proof-of-concept (POC) trial to provide guidance and establish the settings and assessments for (2) A larger confirmatory type 1 hybrid effectiveness Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) followed by the collection of potential facilitators and barriers to the treatment's wide scale implementation. The POC study is aimed to develop all of the study materials for the RCT, and test the screening, referral, and study enrollment procedures. 30 participants will be recruited from 1 primary care clinic. The first 15 eligible participants will be referred to TAU, while the second 15 eligible participants will be referred to the MHP. Study assessments will be performed at the baseline (prior to treatment), 6-week, and 12- week (EOT) time points. In addition, at the end of the 12- week study period, we will interview the participants and providers about their experiences with the study to inform the eventual trial. Feedback will be incorporated into improved study methods. The 300 participant RCT will be used to demonstrate long lasting and significant improvements of the MHP on participants, measured by a set of assessments completed 6 times for each enrolled participant. Study assessments will be performed at the baseline (prior to treatment), 6-, and 12 weeks (EOT) after baseline, as well as 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up time points. Using a stepped-wedge randomization study design, 150 participants will be assigned to MHP and 150 to TAU. Participants with a screening PHQ-9 of 10+ will be randomly assigned to MHP or TAU. For TAU participants, primary care providers will not be directed on how to manage the case, while participants in the MHP group will be scheduled into groups of 10-15 individuals who will work through the program together. Participants will receive the Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRV-B) device and be directed to download and follow the MHP app which prompts daily practices and chat communication. Study assessments for both groups will be administered online with response as the primary outcome. Lastly will be a multistakeholder process evaluation of the delivery of the MHP intervention. Data collected from the 300 RCT participants, as well as administrators and providers from the 8 primary care clinics, will be evaluated for completion rates, engagement metrics, and satisfaction using multiple factors. We will then evaluate the program through surveys and interviews and examine patterns of mental health treatment utilization during the 12-week period, intervention fidelity and competence, attitudes, competencies, and barriers and facilitators of implementation of the MHP.

Interventions

The Meru Health Program is a 12-week, evidence-based, smartphone-delivered, therapist-supported digital mental health intervention with as-needed psychiatrist oversight. Enrolled participants work through the program with a cohort of peers similarly affected by depression, with whom they can engage in confidential, anonymous, voluntary group chats overseen by a licensed clinical therapist. The MHP incorporates a continuous care model including daily interaction with a dedicated clinician, several evidence-based treatment components such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), behavioral activation therapy, and mindfulness meditation (MM), as well as promising newer types of depression treatments such as HRVB, nutritional psychiatry, and sleep training. Practices are introduced to weekly topics via video lessons that are reinforced via CBT practices, meditations, and biofeedback sessions and therapist messaging.

BEHAVIORALTreatment as Usual

Treatment as Usual in this study will include all of the regular standards of care for mental health needs. These standards of care may include, but are not limited to psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, or complementary therapy.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Curebase Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Meru Health, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* PHQ-9 score of 10 or more at the time of screening * Willing to commit to the Meru Health Program if selected * Proficient in the English language * At least 18 years of age at the time of enrollment * Has a valid mailing address * Owns an Apple or Android smartphone with 1 of the 3 most recent versions of the operating system software.

Exclusion criteria

* Active suicide intent with plan to act * Substance use disorder in the past 3 months * Ever been diagnosed with bipolar disorder * Ever been diagnosed with a psychotic disorder * Currently pregnant * Less than 3 months postpartum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scoresBaseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-upThis 9-item Questionnaire is to measure levels of depression and is scored from 0-27. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in EUROHIS- Quality of Life-8 scoresBaseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-upThis 8-item Quality of Life measurement tool is scored from 5-40. Higher scores indicate a higher satisfaction with life.
Change in PROMIS: Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions and Emotions scoresBaseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-upThis 4-item Questionnaire is used to measure management of stress and emotions. It is scored from 0-20 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Change in PROMIS: Sleep Disturbance scoresBaseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-upThis 4-item Questionnaire is used to address sleep quality. It is scored from 0-20 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Change in PROMIS: Sleep-Related Impairment scoresBaseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-upThis 4-item Questionnaire is used to address how sleepy a person is during the day and how it affects productivity. It is scored from 0-20 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scoresBaseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-upThis 7-item Questionnaire is to measure levels of anxiety and is scored from 0-21. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Change in Worker Productivity and Activity Impairment responsesBaseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-upThis qualitative questionnaire is used to assess presenteeism, absenteeism, overall worker productivity, and activity impairment. Responses will be analyzed over time to study the employment status, time missed or spent at work, and the impact of health-related issues.
Change in Single Item Burnout responsesBaseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-upThis 1-item Questionnaire is used to measure levels of work-related burnout. The responses to this single item will be analyzed over time to study changes in the severity of worker burnout.
System Usability ScaleWeek 12This 10-item scale that has been validated as a measure of acceptability and satisfaction with digital interventions. It is scored from 0-100, with higher scores indicating higher user satisfaction.
Change in Brief Resilience Scale scoresBaseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-upThis 6-item Questionnaire is used to measure resilience. It is scored from 1-5 with higher scores indicating greater levels of resilience.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026