Skip to content

Efficacy of C-PRF vs i-PRF in Thin Gingival Biotype Subjects

Efficacy of C-PRF Versus i-PRF on Gingival Thickness & Keratinized Tissue Width in Subjects With Thin Gingival Biotype: ( Split Mouth Controlled Clinical Trials)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05615155
Enrollment
10
Registered
2022-11-14
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2022-11-01
Last updated
2023-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thin Gingival Biotype

Brief summary

Randomized split mouth clinical trials study focused on comparing the efficacy of i-prf versus c-prf injections on gingival thickness and keratinized tissue width in subjects with thin gingival biotype.

Detailed description

Randomized split mouth clinical trials study focused on comparing the efficacy of i-prf versus c-prf injections on gingival thickness and keratinized tissue width in subjects with thin gingival biotype. Gingival biotype is an important clinical parameter that plays an important role in determining the gingival health in the future and the possibility of developing gingival recession or other gingival unhealthy condition that is related to thin gingival biotype. Gingival biotype is consist of gingival thickness and keratinized tissue width, and its either thin or thick, and the later is more favourable to withstand the developing of gingival diseases and unhealthy condition, with this study we compare the effect of i-PRF injection which is approved in many previous clinical trials that it affects the gingival biotype and increases gingival thickness and the keratinized tissue width, and compare it to newly developed PRF generation (C-PRF) which is Concentrated Platelet Rich Fibrin.

Interventions

OTHERPlatelets Rich Fibrin (i-PRF / C-PRF)

one site of the mouth will be injected with i-PRF and the other site will be injected with C-PRF

Sponsors

Sajjad Ahmed Shakir
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥18 years and no systemic disease or pregnancy. 2. Non-smoker. 3. Subjects with clinically healthy intact periodontium; bleeding on probing (BOP)\<10%, probing pocket depth (PPD)≤3mm, intact periodontium (no probing attachment loss). (Chapple et al., 2018). 4. Four non-adjacent sites of anterior region with thin gingival biotype (GT ≤ 1mm). (Patrick H. et al., 2018). 5. No malocclusion, crowding, filling, missing or supernumerary mandibular anterior teeth. 6. No blood-borne conditions. 7. Any symptoms of recent acute illness e.g., COVID-19.

Exclusion criteria

1. Active orthodontic treatment. 2. Previous periodontal surgery. 3. Use of blood thinners. 4. Use of any drugs that might lead to gingival enlargement. 5. Attrition. 6. Gingival Recession. 7. Thick gingival biotype.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
measure the mean differences gain of GT&KTWbaseline and 3 monthsthe increase in gingival thickness and keratinized tissue width after the injection of prf concentrates.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
measure the mean difference gain of GT&KTWbaseline and 1 monththe increase in gingival thickness and keratinized tissue width after the injection of prf concentrates.

Countries

Iraq

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026