Skip to content

Prostate Reirradiation Toxicity Outcomes Feasibility Study

Reirradiation Options for Previously Irradiated Prostate Cancer (RO-PIP): Feasibility Randomised Clinical Trial Investigating Toxicity Outcomes Following Reirradiation With Ultra-hypofractionated External Beam Radiotherapy vs. High Dose Rate Brachytherapy

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05614700
Acronym
RO-PIP
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-11-14
Start date
2022-11-15
Completion date
2026-11-15
Last updated
2022-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer, Radiotherapy Side Effect

Brief summary

The RO-PIP trial aims to determine the feasibility of recruitment to a trial randomising patients to salvage ultra-hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy or high dose rate brachytherapy and provide prospective data on patient recorded toxicity outcomes that will inform a future phase III trial.

Detailed description

Radiotherapy is the most common curative treatment for non-metastatic prostate cancer, however up to 13% of patients will develop local recurrence within 10 years. Patients can undergo further and potentially curative treatment including salvage surgery, brachytherapy (BT), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), high intensity focused ultrasound and cryotherapy. Systematic review shows that high dose rate (HDR) BT and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have the best outcomes in terms of biochemical control and lowest side effects. The RO-PIP trial aims to determine the feasibility of recruitment to a trial randomising patients to salvage HDR-BT or SBRT and provide prospective data on patient recorded toxicity outcomes that will inform a future phase III trial. The primary endpoint of the RO-PIP feasibility study is to evaluate the patient recruitment potential over 2 years to a trial randomising to either SBRT or HDR-BT for patients who develop local recurrence of prostate cancer following previous radiation therapy. The aim is to recruit 60 patients across 3 sites over 2 years and randomise 1:1 to SBRT or HDR-BT. Secondary objectives include recording clinician and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate treatment-related toxicity. In addition, the study aims to identify potential imaging, genomic and proteomic biomarkers that are predictive of toxicity and outcome based on hypoxia status, a prognostic marker of prostate cancer.

Interventions

RADIATIONBrachytherapy

High Dose-Rate Brachytherapy

Hypofractionated External Beam Radiotherapy

Sponsors

University of Leeds
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomised Feasibility Study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male individuals aged over 18 years * Histologically confirmed locally recurrent prostate cancer (following previous radiotherapy no less than 2 years ago) * No metastatic disease * Able and willing to provide an informed consent to participate * World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status 0-2 * Reasonable urinary function (IPSS \< 20 and Qmax \> 10 ml/second on flow tests) * Greater than 10 year life expectancy

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are unfit for a general anaesthetic due to other comorbidities * Clinical or radiological evidence of metastatic prostate disease * Any patient with a medical or psychiatric condition that impairs their ability to give informed consent * Contraindication or intolerance of magnetic resonance scanning * Prior prostatectomy * History of inflammatory bowel disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment Feasibility24 monthsRecruitment rates for the whole 24-month recruitment period will be reported overall and per recruiting site. The average recruitment rate per month and in total over the formal monitoring period will be reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Reported Toxicity0-3 months and >3 monthsIncidence of patient reported acute (0-3 months) and long-term toxicity (\>3 months) and impact on QoL determined by EPIC-26 (prostate cancer related QoL and functional outcomes), EORTC QLQ-C30 (general QoL score) and international prostate symptom score (IPSS) (urinary and sexual functional outcomes) measurements (Key secondary endpoint).
Clinician Reported Toxicity0-3 months and >3 monthsIncidence of clinician-reported treatment toxicity as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Imaging biomarkers1 month and 12 monthsMRI biomarkers at 1 month and 1 year post-treatment predictive of toxicity based on PROMs.
Proteomic BiomarkersBaseline, 1, 3 and 6 monthsChanges in the levels of inflammatory cytokine signatures from urine and blood obtained at baseline and after reirradiation in relation to PROMs.
Imaging ReproducibilityBaseline, 1 and 12 monthsMultiple measures of image quality and reproducibility of prostate functional imaging (e.g. diffusion coefficient values from IVIM sequences) for measuring tumour biology will be summarised.
Hypoxia Gene SignatureBaselineHypoxia levels based on a hypoxia associated gene signature obtained from the pre-salvage RT biopsy correlated with MRI biomarkers.

Contacts

Primary ContactAnn Henry
a.henry@leeds.ac.uk0113 2067630
Backup ContactJim Zhong
j.zhong@leeds.ac.uk0113 2067630

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026