Skip to content

Human Versus Analogue Insulin for Youth With Type 1 Diabetes in Low-Resource Settings

Human Versus Analogue Insulin for Youth With Type 1 Diabetes in Low-Resource Settings: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05614089
Acronym
HumAn-1
Enrollment
400
Registered
2022-11-14
Start date
2023-03-15
Completion date
2025-03-19
Last updated
2025-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Type 1 Diabetes

Keywords

Type 1 Diabetes, Insulin Glargine, Human Insulin, Insulin Analogue, Bangladesh, Tanzania

Brief summary

The primary objective of this trial is to determine whether insulin glargine reduces the risk of serious hypoglycemia or improves Time in Range at 6 months when compared against standard of care human insulin (e.g. NPH or premixed 70/30) among youth living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in low resource settings.

Detailed description

Long-acting insulin analogues have become a de-facto standard of care for patients with T1D living in high-income countries. Unfortunately, insulin analogues remain unavailable or unaffordable for much of the global population. In both 2017 and 2019, applications to add long-acting insulin analogues to the WHO's Model List of Essential Medicines (EML) were rejected due to insufficient evidence of superiority and an unfavorable cost-effectiveness profile when compared against older, less expensive, human insulins (e.g., NPH insulin and premixed 70/30 insulin). In 2021, long-acting insulin analogues were added to the EML but the decision remains controversial since the WHO concluded that magnitude of clinical benefit of long-acting insulin analogues over human insulin for most clinical outcomes was small. Moreover, studies that compare long-acting insulin analogues versus human insulins conducted in high-income settings may not generalize to children and young adults living with T1D in very low-resource settings. To address this unmet need, Pitt has partnered with Brigham and Women's Hospital, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, the Clinton Health Access Initiative and Life For a Child to conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing insulin glargine, a long-acting analogue insulin, against intermediate human insulin among 400 children and young adults living with T1D in a lower resource setting. Note: In preparation for results submission, we made minor changes to the outcomes sections to reflect what is listed in the protocol. For Primary Outcomes #1 and #2, and Secondary Outcomes #3,#4, #5, #7, #8: we added 12 months measurements (in addition to the 6 months measurement). We updated Secondary Outcome #9 to specify the PedsQL Diabetes Symptoms Score. We added Secondary Outcome #10 to include the PedsQL Diabetes Management Score. We added Secondary Outcome #11 for ITSQ scores.

Interventions

DRUGInsulin Glargine

Formulation: Available as a clear liquid in a glass cartridge (1 cartridge =3ml=300 units). Route: Reusable pen Amount of each dose: varies depending on baseline basal insulin needs Dose escalation scheme: Participants randomly assigned to glargine will start with a dose that is generally equal to 80% of their total basal human insulin dose prior to the switch (per ISPAD guidelines and the switching guide developed by Life for a Child with the guidance of Dr. Ragnar Hanas and two other ISPAD members familiar with less-resourced settings). Frequency of dose: once per day (usually administered before bedtime) Duration of therapy: 12 months

DRUGNPH or premixed 70/30 (human insulin)

Formulation: Available as a liquid in a glass cartridge (3ml=300IU) or as liquid in a prefilled, disposable pen (3ml=300IU). Route: Bangladesh = reusable pens; Tanzania = disposable pens Amount of each dose: varies depending on baseline basal insulin needs (per usual care or treating clinician) Frequency of dose: once or twice per day (per usual care or treating clinician) Duration of therapy: 12 months

Sponsors

The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Jing Luo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Children and young adults (age 7-25) 2. Have a clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (T1D)

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior use of any insulin analogue 2. Patients (or parents for children \<18 years old) who refuse to or cannot provide informed consent 3. Who are currently pregnant or plan to become pregnant over the next year 4. Who have previously used a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) for glucose monitoring 5. Who were first diagnosed with T1D less than 12 months ago 6. Who is diagnosed with severe malnutrition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time-in-serious Hypoglycemia6 and 12 months after randomization% time spent less than 54 mg/dl averaged across all daily measures. For 6-month outcome, these data were averaged across two CGM sensors (placed at 6 and 6.5 months). For 12-month outcome, these data were from one CGM sensor placed at 11.5 months.
Time-in-range (TIR)6 and 12 months after randomization% time spent between 70 and 180mg/dl inclusive averaged across all daily measures. For 6-month outcome, these data were averaged across two CGM sensors (placed at 6 and 6.5 months). For 12-month outcome, these data were from one CGM sensor placed at 11.5 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events6 and 12 months after randomizationNumber of events defined as ≥15 minutes in duration \<70 mg/dL between midnight and 6:00 am; specifically, at least 2 sensor values \<70 mg/dL that are ≥15 minutes apart plus no intervening values ≥70 mg/dL For 6-month outcome, these data were averaged across two CGM sensors (placed at 6 and 6.5 months). For 12-month outcome, these data were from one CGM sensor placed at 11.5 months.
Glycemic Control (HbA1c)baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomizationMean HbA1c lab result reported as percent, which is typically how it is reported.
Rate of Severe Hypoglycemic Events6 and 12 months after randomizationSevere hypoglycemic events (requiring assistance of another person to correct) reported by participant per 1000 person-years
Time-in-hypoglycemia6 and 12 months after randomization% time spent less than 70mg/dl averaged across all daily measures. For 6-month outcome, these data were averaged across two CGM sensors (placed at 6 and 6.5 months). For 12-month outcome, these data were from one CGM sensor placed at 11.5 months.
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Symptoms ScoreBaseline and at 6 and 12 months after randomizationMean PedsQL 3.2 DM Diabetes Symptoms score. PedsQL 3.2 DM Diabetes Symptoms scale is composed of 15 items. All items use the same 5-point Likert response scale, with responses ranging from never (0) to almost always (4). Items are reverse scored and transformed on a scale ranging from 0 to 100. The score is the sum of all the items over the number of items answered. Higher scores indicate fewer diabetes symptoms and therefore improved diabetes-specific health-related quality of life (D-HRQoL).
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Management ScoreBaseline and at 6 and 12 months after randomizationMean PedsQL 3.2 DM Diabetes Management score. PedsQL 3.2 DM Diabetes Management scale is composed of 18 items. All items use the same 5-point Likert response scale, with responses ranging from never (0) to almost always (4). Items are reverse scored and transformed on a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate fewer diabetes management problems and therefore improved D-HRQoL.
Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ) ScoresBaseline and at 6 and 12 months after randomizationThe ITSQ is composed of 22 items. A total 22-item score is reported, and the items are also divided into five subscales: Regimen Inconvenience (5 items), Lifestyle Flexibility (3 items), Glycemic Control (3 items), Hypoglycemic Control (5 items), and Insulin Delivery Device Satisfaction (6 items). Items use 7-point Likert scale responses, ranging from 1 (positive, e.g. No bother at all) to 7 (negative, e.g. A tremendous bother), though the specific response labels vary by question. Items were reverse scored and transformed to range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher treatment satisfaction.
Rate of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)6 and 12 months after randomizationHospitalization or Emergency Room Visit (serious adverse event) with primary diagnosis of Diabetic Ketoacidosis. This was measured by self-report and confirmed through review of hospital records
Time-above-range6 and 12 months after randomization% time spent greater than 180mg/dl averaged across all daily measures. For 6-month outcome, these data were averaged across two CGM sensors (placed at 6 and 6.5 months). For 12-month outcome, these data were from one CGM sensor placed at 11.5 months.

Countries

Bangladesh, Tanzania

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

17 participants consented and had baseline demographics collected in-person and/or baseline/run-in CGM placed, but withdrew from study before randomization to arm due to the following reasons: No longer interested in participating, Became ineligible

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Glargine
Insulin glargine (long-acting insulin analogue) Insulin Glargine: Formulation: Available as a clear liquid in a glass cartridge (1 cartridge =3ml=300 units). Route: Reusable pen Amount of each dose: varies depending on baseline basal insulin needs Dose escalation scheme: Participants randomly assigned to glargine will start with a dose that is generally equal to 80% of their total basal human insulin dose prior to the switch (per ISPAD guidelines and the switching guide developed by Life for a Child with the guidance of Dr. Ragnar Hanas and two other ISPAD members familiar with less-resourced settings). Frequency of dose: once per day (usually administered before bedtime) Duration of therapy: 12 months
199
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)
NPH or premixed 70/30 (human insulin) NPH or premixed 70/30 (human insulin): Formulation: Available as a liquid in a glass vial or glass cartridge (10ml=1000IU). Route: Bangladesh = syringes or reusable pens; Tanzania = disposable pens Subcutaneous injection using insulin syringe and needle Amount of each dose: varies depending on baseline basal insulin needs (per usual care or treating clinician) Frequency of dose: once or twice per day (per usual care or treating clinician) Duration of therapy: 12 months
201
Total400

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up51
Overall StudyPregnancy52

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGlargineNPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Total
Age, Continuous17.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
16.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
16.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
Age, Customized
Age, categorical
10 -<18 years
84 Participants88 Participants172 Participants
Age, Customized
Age, categorical
18 - <26 years
89 Participants89 Participants178 Participants
Age, Customized
Age, categorical
7 -<10 years
26 Participants24 Participants50 Participants
Amputation0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
BMI20.3 (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
19.8 (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
20.0 (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
c-peptide0.25 ng/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31
0.25 ng/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.34
0.25 ng/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.32
Diabetic Foot Disease2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Duration of Type 1 Diabetes5.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
5.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
5.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
Education of Parent
College/Diploma
26 Participants36 Participants62 Participants
Education of Parent
Don't know
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Education of Parent
No Education
10 Participants14 Participants24 Participants
Education of Parent
Primary School/Education
47 Participants46 Participants93 Participants
Education of Parent
Secondary School/Education
93 Participants77 Participants170 Participants
Education of Parent
University
23 Participants26 Participants49 Participants
Education of Participant
College/Diploma
44 Participants54 Participants98 Participants
Education of Participant
No Education
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Education of Participant
Primary School/Education
64 Participants66 Participants130 Participants
Education of Participant
Secondary School/Education
76 Participants67 Participants143 Participants
Education of Participant
University
14 Participants11 Participants25 Participants
HbA1c9.7 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
9.9 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
9.8 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
History of DKA (diabetic ketoacidosis)
Don't know
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
History of DKA (diabetic ketoacidosis)
No
146 Participants139 Participants285 Participants
History of DKA (diabetic ketoacidosis)
Yes
53 Participants61 Participants114 Participants
ITSQ Total75.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
75.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
75.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
Nephropathy2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Neuropathy3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events3.6 number of events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
3.4 number of events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
3.5 number of events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
Number of Asymptomatic Hypoglycemic Events1.0 number of events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
1.1 number of events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
1.0 number of events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events0.9 number of events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
0.8 number of events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
0.9 number of events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
Number of Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Events1.9 number of events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
2.0 number of events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
1.9 number of events
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
# of Adults Living with3.1 number of people
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
2.8 number of people
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
2.9 number of people
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Management Score80.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
81.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
80.7 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Symptoms Score68.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
69.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
68.7 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
Percent Time Above Range50.2 percentage of time
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.7
54.3 percentage of time
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.6
52.3 percentage of time
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.7
Percent Time in Hypoglycemia10.9 percentage of time
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
10.7 percentage of time
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
10.8 percentage of time
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Percent Time in Range38.9 percentage of time
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.9
35.0 percentage of time
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.3
36.9 percentage of time
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.1
Percent Time in Serious Hypoglycemia3.7 percentage of time
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
3.7 percentage of time
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
3.7 percentage of time
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity/Tribe
Bengali
124 Participants126 Participants250 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity/Tribe
Haya
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity/Tribe
Kurya
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity/Tribe
Other
28 Participants20 Participants48 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity/Tribe
Sukuma
41 Participants47 Participants88 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Bangladesh
124 participants126 participants250 participants
Region of Enrollment
Tanzania
75 participants75 participants150 participants
Retinopathy8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
107 Participants115 Participants222 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
92 Participants86 Participants178 Participants
Socioeconomic Status
Lower middle
33 Participants29 Participants62 Participants
Socioeconomic Status
Middle
60 Participants63 Participants123 Participants
Socioeconomic Status
Poor
97 Participants96 Participants193 Participants
Socioeconomic Status
Rice farmer
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Socioeconomic Status
Upper middle
6 Participants12 Participants18 Participants
Socioeconomic Status
Well off/Rich
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Total Number of Units of Insulin per Day/Weight1.0 insulin units/kg per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
1.1 insulin units/kg per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
1.0 insulin units/kg per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
Type of Insulin Regimen
NPH + Regular with meals
196 Participants196 Participants392 Participants
Type of Insulin Regimen
Premixed 70/30 alone
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Type of Insulin Regimen
Premixed 70/30 + Regular with meals
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1991 / 201
other
Total, other adverse events
33 / 19933 / 201
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 19913 / 201

Outcome results

Primary

Time-in-range (TIR)

% time spent between 70 and 180mg/dl inclusive averaged across all daily measures. For 6-month outcome, these data were averaged across two CGM sensors (placed at 6 and 6.5 months). For 12-month outcome, these data were from one CGM sensor placed at 11.5 months.

Time frame: 6 and 12 months after randomization

Population: Randomized participants still on study with available CGM data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GlargineTime-in-range (TIR)6-month40.5 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 18.4
GlargineTime-in-range (TIR)12-month38.5 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 20.1
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Time-in-range (TIR)6-month38.1 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 18.1
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Time-in-range (TIR)12-month37.7 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 19.7
Comparison: 6-month (primary)p-value: 0.71Regression, Linear
Comparison: 12-monthp-value: 0.64Regression, Linear
Primary

Time-in-serious Hypoglycemia

% time spent less than 54 mg/dl averaged across all daily measures. For 6-month outcome, these data were averaged across two CGM sensors (placed at 6 and 6.5 months). For 12-month outcome, these data were from one CGM sensor placed at 11.5 months.

Time frame: 6 and 12 months after randomization

Population: Randomized participants still on study with available CGM data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GlargineTime-in-serious Hypoglycemia6-month3.6 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 5.6
GlargineTime-in-serious Hypoglycemia12-month2.4 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 3.5
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Time-in-serious Hypoglycemia6-month3.4 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 4.3
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Time-in-serious Hypoglycemia12-month3.8 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 5.5
Comparison: 6-month (primary)p-value: 0.43Regression, Linear
Comparison: 12-monthp-value: 0.008Regression, Linear
Secondary

Glycemic Control (HbA1c)

Mean HbA1c lab result reported as percent, which is typically how it is reported.

Time frame: baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomization

Population: Randomized participants still on study with available HbA1c data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GlargineGlycemic Control (HbA1c)12-month9.4 percentStandard Deviation 2.3
GlargineGlycemic Control (HbA1c)3-month9.3 percentStandard Deviation 2.5
GlargineGlycemic Control (HbA1c)Baseline9.7 percentStandard Deviation 2.8
GlargineGlycemic Control (HbA1c)6-month9.4 percentStandard Deviation 2.3
GlargineGlycemic Control (HbA1c)9-month9.5 percentStandard Deviation 2.1
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Glycemic Control (HbA1c)6-month9.5 percentStandard Deviation 2.4
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Glycemic Control (HbA1c)9-month9.4 percentStandard Deviation 2.2
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Glycemic Control (HbA1c)12-month9.4 percentStandard Deviation 2.5
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Glycemic Control (HbA1c)Baseline9.9 percentStandard Deviation 2.8
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Glycemic Control (HbA1c)3-month9.4 percentStandard Deviation 2.5
Comparison: 6-monthp-value: 0.81Regression, Linear
Comparison: 12-monthp-value: 0.29Regression, Linear
Secondary

Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ) Scores

The ITSQ is composed of 22 items. A total 22-item score is reported, and the items are also divided into five subscales: Regimen Inconvenience (5 items), Lifestyle Flexibility (3 items), Glycemic Control (3 items), Hypoglycemic Control (5 items), and Insulin Delivery Device Satisfaction (6 items). Items use 7-point Likert scale responses, ranging from 1 (positive, e.g. No bother at all) to 7 (negative, e.g. A tremendous bother), though the specific response labels vary by question. Items were reverse scored and transformed to range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher treatment satisfaction.

Time frame: Baseline and at 6 and 12 months after randomization

Population: Randomized participants still on study with available ITSQ data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GlargineInsulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ) ScoresBaseline75.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
GlargineInsulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ) Scores6-month84.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
GlargineInsulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ) Scores12-month87.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ) ScoresBaseline75.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ) Scores6-month82.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ) Scores12-month85.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Comparison: 6-monthp-value: 0.04Regression, Linear
Comparison: 12-monthp-value: 0.1Regression, Linear
Secondary

Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events

Number of events defined as ≥15 minutes in duration \<70 mg/dL between midnight and 6:00 am; specifically, at least 2 sensor values \<70 mg/dL that are ≥15 minutes apart plus no intervening values ≥70 mg/dL For 6-month outcome, these data were averaged across two CGM sensors (placed at 6 and 6.5 months). For 12-month outcome, these data were from one CGM sensor placed at 11.5 months.

Time frame: 6 and 12 months after randomization

Population: Randomized participants still on study with available CGM data during nocturnal hours at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GlargineNocturnal Hypoglycemic Events6-month3.5 number of eventsStandard Deviation 2.6
GlargineNocturnal Hypoglycemic Events12-month3.2 number of eventsStandard Deviation 2.7
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events6-month3.6 number of eventsStandard Deviation 2.7
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events12-month4.2 number of eventsStandard Deviation 3.5
Comparison: 6-monthp-value: 0.7Regression, Linear
Comparison: 12-monthp-value: 0.02Regression, Linear
Secondary

Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Management Score

Mean PedsQL 3.2 DM Diabetes Management score. PedsQL 3.2 DM Diabetes Management scale is composed of 18 items. All items use the same 5-point Likert response scale, with responses ranging from never (0) to almost always (4). Items are reverse scored and transformed on a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate fewer diabetes management problems and therefore improved D-HRQoL.

Time frame: Baseline and at 6 and 12 months after randomization

Population: Randomized participants still on study with available PedsQL data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GlarginePediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Management ScoreBaseline80.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
GlarginePediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Management Score6-month85.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.7
GlarginePediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Management Score12-month88.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Management ScoreBaseline81.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.8
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Management Score6-month85.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Management Score12-month88.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Comparison: 6-monthp-value: 0.81Regression, Linear
Comparison: 12-monthp-value: 0.44Regression, Linear
Secondary

Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Symptoms Score

Mean PedsQL 3.2 DM Diabetes Symptoms score. PedsQL 3.2 DM Diabetes Symptoms scale is composed of 15 items. All items use the same 5-point Likert response scale, with responses ranging from never (0) to almost always (4). Items are reverse scored and transformed on a scale ranging from 0 to 100. The score is the sum of all the items over the number of items answered. Higher scores indicate fewer diabetes symptoms and therefore improved diabetes-specific health-related quality of life (D-HRQoL).

Time frame: Baseline and at 6 and 12 months after randomization

Population: Randomized participants still on study with available PedsQL data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GlarginePediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Symptoms ScoreBaseline68.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.7
GlarginePediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Symptoms Score6-month74.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
GlarginePediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Symptoms Score12-month75.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Symptoms ScoreBaseline69.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Symptoms Score6-month75.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.2 Diabetes Module (PedsQL 3.2 DM) Diabetes Symptoms Score12-month76.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
Comparison: 6-monthp-value: 0.95Regression, Linear
Comparison: 12-monthp-value: 0.73Regression, Linear
Secondary

Rate of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)

Hospitalization or Emergency Room Visit (serious adverse event) with primary diagnosis of Diabetic Ketoacidosis. This was measured by self-report and confirmed through review of hospital records

Time frame: 6 and 12 months after randomization

Population: Randomized participants who knew whether or not they had an event at least one of the time points post-baseline/run-in phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GlargineRate of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)6-month0 events per 1000 person years
GlargineRate of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)12-month0 events per 1000 person years
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Rate of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)6-month0 events per 1000 person years
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Rate of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)12-month0 events per 1000 person years
Comparison: Through 6-monthp-value: 0.83Negative Binomial Regression
Comparison: Through 12-monthp-value: 0.09Negative Binomial Regression
Secondary

Rate of Severe Hypoglycemic Events

Severe hypoglycemic events (requiring assistance of another person to correct) reported by participant per 1000 person-years

Time frame: 6 and 12 months after randomization

Population: Randomized participants who knew whether or not they had an event at least one of the time points post-baseline/run-in phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GlargineRate of Severe Hypoglycemic Events6-month0 events per 1000 person years
GlargineRate of Severe Hypoglycemic Events12-month1.33 events per 1000 person years
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Rate of Severe Hypoglycemic Events6-month3.11 events per 1000 person years
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Rate of Severe Hypoglycemic Events12-month1.41 events per 1000 person years
Comparison: Through 6-monthp-value: 0.98Negative Binomial Regression
Comparison: Through 12-monthp-value: 0.61Negative Binomial Regression
Secondary

Time-above-range

% time spent greater than 180mg/dl averaged across all daily measures. For 6-month outcome, these data were averaged across two CGM sensors (placed at 6 and 6.5 months). For 12-month outcome, these data were from one CGM sensor placed at 11.5 months.

Time frame: 6 and 12 months after randomization

Population: Randomized participants still on study with available CGM data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GlargineTime-above-range6-month48.7 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 22.7
GlargineTime-above-range12-month52.1 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 24.9
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Time-above-range6-month51.8 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 23.4
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Time-above-range12-month51.1 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 26
Comparison: 6-monthp-value: 0.58Regression, Linear
Comparison: 12-monthp-value: 0.21Regression, Linear
Secondary

Time-in-hypoglycemia

% time spent less than 70mg/dl averaged across all daily measures. For 6-month outcome, these data were averaged across two CGM sensors (placed at 6 and 6.5 months). For 12-month outcome, these data were from one CGM sensor placed at 11.5 months.

Time frame: 6 and 12 months after randomization

Population: Randomized participants still on study with available CGM data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GlargineTime-in-hypoglycemia12-month9.4 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 10.4
GlargineTime-in-hypoglycemia6-month10.8 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 9.5
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Time-in-hypoglycemia6-month10.2 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 8.5
NPH or Premixed 70/30 (Human Insulin)Time-in-hypoglycemia12-month11.2 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 10.8
Comparison: 6-monthp-value: 0.54Regression, Linear
Comparison: 12-monthp-value: 0.07Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 8, 2026