Skip to content

Prognostic Value of Different Nutritional Screening Tools in Acute Pancreatitis

Comparison of the Prognostic Value of Different Nutritional Assessment Scores Regarding the Course in Acute Pancreatitis - a Prospective Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05613673
Acronym
NuRiPa
Enrollment
110
Registered
2022-11-14
Start date
2022-10-11
Completion date
2025-04-05
Last updated
2024-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Pancreatitis, Malnutrition

Keywords

Acute pancreatitis, Nutritional screening

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to compare the prognostic value of different nutritional screening tools to predict the course of acute pancreatitis. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Which nutritional screening tool performs best to predict length of hospital stay? * Which nutritional screening tool performs best to predict clinical outcome (disease severity, length of hospital stay, mortality, need for rehospitalization)? Participants will answer questions regarding their nutritional status and undergo basic anthropometric assessments (e.g. measurement of waist circumference) to evaluate their risk of malnutrition.

Detailed description

Malnutrition seems to be related to an adverse outcome of acute pancreatitis. However, it is still unclear which of the various available nutritional screening tools is suited best to predict the clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with acute pancreatitis. Therefore, in this study we compare the predictive performance of 6 different nutritional screening tools that are commonly applied in clinical practice regarding their respective associations with severity of acute pancreatitis, length of hospital stay, mortality and need for rehospitalization. To determine patients' nutritional status, subjects will be inquired about their recent food intake as well as body weight and undergo basic anthropometric assessments according to the different screening tools. Six months after the initial diagnosis patients will be contacted via mail to report on need for rehospitalization due to acute pancreatitis during this time period.

Interventions

No intervention - observational study only

Sponsors

University Medicine Greifswald
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* verified diagnosis of acute pancreatitis * provision of informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy * inability to provide consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relation of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 to length of hospital stayBaselineAssociation between Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) result and length of hospital stay. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relation of Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form to length of hospital stayBaselineAssociation between Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form (MNA-SF) result and length of hospital stay. MNA-SF score ranges from 0 to 14, with lower values indicating greater nutritional risk.
Relation of Subjective Global Assessment to length of hospital stayBaselineAssociation between Subjective Global Assessment result and length of hospital stay. SGA scores of A, B, and C indicate no malnutrition, moderate malnutrition or severe malnutrition, respectively.
Relation of Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool to length of hospital stayBaselineAssociation between Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) result and length of hospital stay. MUST score ranges from 0 to 6, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.
Relation of Short Nutritional Assessment Questionaire to length of hospital stayBaselineAssociation between Short Nutritional Assessment Questionaire (SNAQ) result and length of hospital stay. SNAQ score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.
Relation of fat-free mass to length of hospital stayBaselineAssociation between fat-free mass determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis and length of hospital stay.
Relation of fat mass to length of hospital stayBaselineAssociation between fat mass determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis and length of hospital stay.
Relation of skeletal muscle mass to length of hospital stayBaselineAssociation between skeletal muscle mass determined by computed tomography and length of hospital stay.
Relation of waist circumference to length of hospital stayBaselineAssociation between waist circumference and length of hospital stay.
Relation of albumin to length of hospital stayBaselineAssociation between plasma albumin concentration at admission and length of hospital stay.
Relation of C-reactive protein to length of hospital stayBaselineAssociation between plasma C-reactive protein concentration at admission and length of hospital stay.
Relation of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 to disease severityBaselineAssociation between Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) result and severity of acute pancreatitis based on the Revised Atlanta Classification. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk. Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification acute pancreatitis can be graded as mild, moderate, or severe.
Relation of Nutritional Risk Index to disease severityBaselineAssociation between Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) result and severity of acute pancreatitis based on the Revised Atlanta Classification. NRI is a continuous measure, with lower values indicating greater nutritional risk. Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification acute pancreatitis can be graded as mild, moderate, or severe.
Relation of Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form to disease severityBaselineAssociation between Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form (MNA-SF) result and severity of acute pancreatitis based on the Revised Atlanta Classification. MNA-SF score ranges from 0 to 14, with lower values indicating greater nutritional risk. Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification acute pancreatitis can be graded as mild, moderate, or severe.
Relation of Subjective Global Assessment to disease severityBaselineAssociation between Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) result and severity of acute pancreatitis based on the Revised Atlanta Classification. SGA scores of A, B, and C indicate no malnutrition, moderate malnutrition or severe malnutrition, respectively. Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification acute pancreatitis can be graded as mild, moderate, or severe.
Relation of Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool to disease severityBaselineAssociation between Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) result and severity of acute pancreatitis based on the Revised Atlanta Classification. MUST score ranges from 0 to 6, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk. Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification acute pancreatitis can be graded as mild, moderate, or severe.
Relation of Short Nutritional Assessment Questionaire to disease severityBaselineAssociation between Short Nutritional Assessment Questionaire (SNAQ) result and severity of acute pancreatitis based on the Revised Atlanta Classification. SNAQ score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk. Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification acute pancreatitis can be graded as mild, moderate, or severe.
Relation of fat-free mass to disease severityBaselineAssociation between fat-free mass determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis and severity of acute pancreatitis based on the Revised Atlanta Classification. Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification acute pancreatitis can be graded as mild, moderate, or severe.
Relation of fat mass to disease severityBaselineAssociation between fat mass determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis and severity of acute pancreatitis based on the Revised Atlanta Classification. Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification acute pancreatitis can be graded as mild, moderate, or severe.
Relation of skeletal muscle mass to disease severityBaselineAssociation between skeletal muscle mass determined by computed tomography and severity of acute pancreatitis based on the Revised Atlanta Classification. Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification acute pancreatitis can be graded as mild, moderate, or severe.
Relation of waist circumference to disease severityBaselineAssociation between waist circumference and severity of acute pancreatitis based on the Revised Atlanta Classification. Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification acute pancreatitis can be graded as mild, moderate, or severe.
Relation of albumin to disease severityBaselineAssociation between plasma albumin concentration at admission and severity of acute pancreatitis based on the Revised Atlanta Classification. Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification acute pancreatitis can be graded as mild, moderate, or severe.
Relation of C-reactive protein to disease severityBaselineAssociation between plasma C-reactive protein concentration at admission and severity of acute pancreatitis based on the Revised Atlanta Classification. Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification acute pancreatitis can be graded as mild, moderate, or severe.
Relation of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 to mortalityBaselineAssociation between Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) result and in-hospital mortality. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.
Relation of Nutritional Risk Index to mortalityBaselineAssociation between Nutritional Risk Index (Index) result and in-hospital mortality. NRI is a continuous measure, with lower values indicating greater nutritional risk.
Relation of Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form to mortalityBaselineAssociation between Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form (MNA-SF) result and in-hospital mortality. MNA-SF score ranges from 0 to 14, with lower values indicating greater nutritional risk.
Relation of Subjective Global Assessment to mortalityBaselineAssociation between Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) result and in-hospital mortality. SGA scores of A, B, and C indicate no malnutrition, moderate malnutrition or severe malnutrition, respectively.
Relation of Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool to mortalityBaselineAssociation between Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) result and in-hospital mortality. MUST score ranges from 0 to 6, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.
Relation of Short Nutritional Assessment Questionaire to mortalityBaselineAssociation between Short Nutritional Assessment Questionaire (SNAQ) result and in-hospital mortality. SNAQ score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.
Relation of fat-free mass to mortalityBaselineAssociation between fat-free mass determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis and in-hospital mortality.
Relation of fat mass to mortalityBaselineAssociation between fat mass determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis and in-hospital mortality.
Relation of skeletal muscle mass to mortalityBaselineAssociation between skeletal muscle mass determined by computed tomography and in-hospital mortality.
Relation of waist circumference to mortalityBaselineAssociation between waist circumference and in-hospital mortality.
Relation of albumin to mortalityBaselineAssociation between plasma albumin concentration at admission and in-hospital mortality.
Relation of C-reactive protein to mortalityBaselineAssociation between plasma C-reactive protein concentration at admission and in-hospital mortality.
Relation of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 to rehospitalization6 months after initial hospital admissionAssociation between Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) result and number of rehospitalizations due to acute pancreatitis within 6 months after initial admission to hospital. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.
Relation of Nutritional Risk Index to rehospitalization6 months after initial hospital admissionAssociation between Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) result and number of rehospitalizations due to acute pancreatitis within 6 months after initial admission to hospital. NRI is a continuous measure, with lower values indicating greater nutritional risk.
Relation of Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form to rehospitalization6 months after initial hospital admissionAssociation between Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form (MNA-SF) result and number of rehospitalizations due to acute pancreatitis within 6 months after initial admission to hospital. MNA-SF score ranges from 0 to 14, with lower values indicating greater nutritional risk.
Relation of Subjective Global Assessment to rehospitalization6 months after initial hospital admissionAssociation between Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) result and number of rehospitalizations due to acute pancreatitis within 6 months after initial admission to hospital. SGA scores of A, B, and C indicate no malnutrition, moderate malnutrition or severe malnutrition, respectively.
Relation of Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool to rehospitalization6 months after initial hospital admissionAssociation between Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) result and number of rehospitalizations due to acute pancreatitis within 6 months after initial admission to hospital. MUST score ranges from 0 to 6, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.
Relation of Short Nutritional Assessment Questionaire to rehospitalization6 months after initial hospital admissionAssociation between Short Nutritional Assessment Questionaire (SNAQ) result and number of rehospitalizations due to acute pancreatitis within 6 months after initial admission to hospital. SNAQ score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.
Relation of Nutritional Risk Index to length of hospital stayBaselineAssociation between Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) result and length of hospital stay. NRI is a continuous measure, with lower values indicating greater nutritional risk.
Relation of fat mass to rehospitalization6 months after initial hospital admissionAssociation between fat mass determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis and number of rehospitalizations due to acute pancreatitis within 6 months after initial admission to hospital.
Relation of skeletal muscle mass to rehospitalization6 months after initial hospital admissionAssociation between skeletal muscle mass determined by computed tomography and number of rehospitalizations due to acute pancreatitis within 6 months after initial admission to hospital.
Relation of waist circumference to rehospitalization6 months after initial hospital admissionAssociation between waist circumference and number of rehospitalizations due to acute pancreatitis within 6 months after initial admission to hospital.
Relation of albumin to rehospitalization6 months after initial hospital admissionAssociation between plasma albumin concentration at admission and number of rehospitalizations due to acute pancreatitis within 6 months after initial admission to hospital.
Relation of C-reactive protein to rehospitalization6 months after initial hospital admissionAssociation between plasma C-reactive protein concentration at admission and number of rehospitalizations due to acute pancreatitis within 6 months after initial admission to hospital.
Relation of fat-free mass to rehospitalization6 months after initial hospital admissionAssociation between fat-free mass determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis and number of rehospitalizations due to acute pancreatitis within 6 months after initial admission to hospital.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026