Skip to content

Comparative Evaluation of 3 Dimensional Changes of Dentition in Post Orthodontic Patients With Immediate vs Delayed (Post 7 Days) Retainer Delivery

Comparative Evaluation of 3 Dimensional Changes of Dentition in Post Orthodontic Patients With Immediate vs Delayed (Post 7 Days) Retainer Delivery-A Randomized Control Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05612932
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-11-10
Start date
2022-05-25
Completion date
2024-04-25
Last updated
2023-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Relapse

Keywords

orthodontic retention

Brief summary

After orthodontic treatment, relapse is inevitable and is defined as a movement towards the initial state which is undesirable. To prevent relapse, a phase of retention is required. Retention has been defined as the holding of teeth following orthodontic treatment in the treated position for the period of time necessary for the maintenance of the result. Controversies regarding retention regime exist due to lack of high quality evidence regarding duration, type and timing of different type retainer. There is an unusual delay after debonding in retainer delivery as the retainer is fabricated at the laboratory. Such the present study will help us to find out within which time period the retainer should be delivered.

Detailed description

The proposed study will be a prospective, non-pharmacological, single blind, randomized clinical trial to evaluate if there is a difference in transverse (X-axis), A-P(Y-axis) and Vertical plane(Z-axis) of dentition in two group of post orthodontic treatment patients with immediate retainer delivery in one group and post 7 days retainer delivery in other group of patients. The present study will be conducted in the Department of Orthodontic and Dentofacial Orthopedics, P.G.I.D.S, Pt. B.D Sharma University of health sciences, Rohtak. The study will be carried out after the institutional approval obtained from ethical committee. A sample size of 18 patients was calculated keeping confidence interval 95% with power 80%. Accounting for a 10% drop out rate, 20 patients will be enrolled in each group. Patient will be randomly allocated to the study group by a person not involved in the trial using computer generated randomization list. Changes in the tooth movement in transverse(X-axis), A-P(Y-axis), Vertical plane(Z-axis) will be compared in terms of intercanine width, intermolar width, overjet, overbite and contact point displacement between the two groups at following time intervals. These parameters will be charted at T0, T1, T2,T3 and T4 for each patient.Changes in the tooth movement in transverse(X-axis), A-P(Y-axis), Vertical plane(Z-axis) will be compared in terms of intercanine width, intermolar width, overjet, overbite and contact point displacement between the two groups at following time intervals. These parameters will be charted at T0, T1, T2,T3 and T4 for each patient. T0 - Baseline records, at the time of debonding. T1 - Records obtained at the time of retainer delivery. T2 - Records obtained after 1 month of retainer delivery. T3 - Records obtained after 3 months of retainer delivery. T4 - Records obtained after 6 months of retainer delivery

Interventions

post orthodontic treatment patients will be given orthodontic retainer immediately after debonding

post orthodontic treatment patients will be given orthodontic retainer after 7 days of debonding

Sponsors

Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult orthodontic patients treated with 022\*028 MBT appliance with following sequence of wires- 014, 016, 16\*22, 17\*25, 19\*25 NiTi followed by 19\*25 SS. * Treatment duration of 24-36 months with Optimal functional occlusion at end of treatment (PAR score \>70%). * Class I bimax and Class II div I with pre-treatment Little's irregularity index \<6mm in both upper and lower arch. * Nonsurgical and non-orthopedic patients. * Non syndromic patients and no impaction of teeth except third molars. * No previous orthodontic treatment. * Optimal periodontal condition and Good oral hygiene. * Good compliance regarding retainer wear (Cases who never missed more than 2 consecutive appointment and who reported with less no of breakages).

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with incomplete orthodontic treatment. * TMJ disorder patients. * Any systemic disease affecting bone and general growth. * Patients with incomplete records. * Patient who fail to follow up or undergo complete treatment. * Patient with learning difficulties

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
OverjetT0 - baseline on the day of debondingsagittal distance between upper and lower incisors
contact point displacementT0 - baseline on the day of debondingdisplacement of contact points in anterior teeth
overbiteT0 - baseline on the day of debondingvertical overlap of upper and lower incisors
intermolar widthT0 - baseline on the day of debondingtransverse distance between the first molars
intercanine widthT0 - baseline on the day of debondingtransverse distance between the canine

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactDr. Devender kumar, MDS
Davenderkumar0195@gmail.com8950447738

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026