Skip to content

Comparative Effectiveness of Online 8-session CBT vs. 1-Session Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain - The PROGRESS Study

Comparative Effectiveness of Online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs. An Online Single-Session Pain Relief Skills Class for Chronic Pain - The PROGRESS Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05612750
Acronym
PROGRESS
Enrollment
1650
Registered
2022-11-10
Start date
2023-01-01
Completion date
2029-05-01
Last updated
2026-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lupus, Pain, Chronic, Pelvic Pain

Keywords

Young adult, Lupus, Pelvic Pain, Behavioral Health

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to conduct a pragmatic clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of: (1) 8-week cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain (pain-CBT; sixteen hours total treatment time); and (2) a 1-session pain relief skills intervention for chronic pain (Empowered Relief; two hours total treatment time).

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to conduct a pragmatic clinical trial comparing the effectiveness: (1) 8-session cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain (pain-CBT); and (2) a 1-session pain relief skills intervention for chronic pain (Empowered Relief). The investigators aim to understand for patients which treatment works best. Online evidence-based behavioral treatment for pain will greatly expand access to patients across the U.S. living with diverse chronic pain conditions. Results from this study will fill several critical gaps in evidence that are preventing patients and physicians from making informed decisions about their pain care. This study will provide a low-cost, relatively low-risk, widely available and feasible protocol that directly addresses the needs of millions of community-based outpatients and their physicians.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

A trained psychologist delivers 8 sessions of low-literacy CBT (the LAMP protocol) to groups of patients who were randomized to this treatment arm.

A certified instructor delivers 1 session of pain relief skills intervention (Empowered Relief) to groups of patients who were randomized to this treatment arm.

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants and research staff will know arm assignment. Co-investigators, project statisticians, and the protocol director at each study site will remain blinded until final assessment.

Intervention model description

A pragmatic clinical trial randomizing to one of two (standard of care) online group behavioral treatments: (1) 8-session cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain (pain-CBT); and (2) single-session pain relief skills intervention for chronic pain (Empowered Relief).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. At least 18 years of age or older of either sex (and all genders). 2. Chronic pain (pain that occurs on at least half of the days of 3 months or more). 3. Past-month average pain intensity score of at least 3/10. 4. Ability to adhere to and complete study protocols.

Exclusion criteria

1. Inability to provide informed consent. 2. Cognitive impairment, non-English speaking, or psychological factors that would preclude comprehension of material and/or full participation in the study including group treatment. 3. Active suicidality documented in medical records. 4. Study staff may exclude individuals with a known history of disruptive behavior to minimize contamination of the learning environment for an entire treatment cohort. 5. Receipt of either study treatment in the past 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensity1 monthsCompare study treatments for primary outcomes post-treatment with the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10)
Pain Interference1 monthCompare study treatments for primary outcomes post-treatment with the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sleep Disturbance1 monthCompare treatment groups on the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 6-item
Pain Bothersomeness1 monthCompare treatment groups for Pain Bothersomeness on a Numeric Rating Scale (0-10)
Pain Catastrophizing1 monthsPain Catastrophizing Scale is a 13-item measure with a total score ranging from 0-52 with higher scores indicative of more catastrophizing.
Anxiety1 monthCompare treatment groups for anxiety using the PROMIS Anxiety 6-item
Satisfaction with Social Roles/Responsibilities1 monthCompare treatment groups for PROMIS 6 item Satisfaction with Social Roles/Responsibilities
Patient Global Impression of Change1monthsCompare treatment groups for PROMISE 1 item Global Impression of Change scale
Depression1 monthCompare study treatments for primary outcomes post-treatment with the PROMIS 6 item Depression scale.
Fatigue1 monthCompare study treatments for primary outcomes post-treatment with the PROMIS 6 item Fatigue scale.
Anger1 monthCompare study treatments for primary outcomes post-treatment with the PROMIS 5 item Anger scale.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTEmma A Adair, BS
eadair@stanford.edu6097448937
CONTACTCorinne Jung, PhD
Cejung@stanford.edu(650) 724-0522

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 27, 2026